How Fat Are You?

Obesity is a Polite Word - Fat is Not

By Tessa4ever, published Aug 21, 2006
Published Content: 45  Total Views: 24,322  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 2.0 of 5


Fat is a politically incorrect word. It has stigma and aggression attached to it. Outside of the unhappiness it causes to some, there are more serious concerns. Increasing evidence indicates that obesity is a major course of premature death. So, how fat are you, and how did you get that way? 

In order to find out how you should weigh, take the first five feet of your height (if you're a female) use 100 lbs as a base figure. If you’re a man, the base figure for the first five feet in height is 110 lbs. Then, for every additional inch of height, you add 5 lbs. So, if you’re a woman, and your height is 5’4”, then you should weight 120 lbs. If you have a small bone structure, subtract 5 lbs making it 115 lbs, and you have a heavy bone structure, add 5 lbs, making it 125 lbs. If you’re a male, and your height is 5’ 11”, then your perfect weight would be 165 lbs. Then, add or subtract 5 lbs, depending on bone structure. 

In addition to this, you’re permitted an extra 10% to this figure, so a woman of 5’4” weighing 120 lbs could add another 11 lbs making it 131 lbs. Above that, she’s going to develop health problems.. And if 33% of her weight is fat (around 160 lbs), then she’s medically obese. A man of 5’11’ would be slightly overweight if he weighed 175 lbs and medically obese if he weighed 230 lbs. 

In addition to this, recent research has shown that those that carry most of their weight on their stomachs are in danger of heart disease and are likely to die early. Life, when one is overweight, can have many problems. 

So how do we all get this way? Basically, there are two reasons. The first is that we eat too much. The second is that we eat unhealthy foods. 

Currently, the food pyramid tells us that we should make grains the center of our diet. Yet all grains contain an overload of starch. Starch, like sugar, triggers insulin. When grains are refined, they can be put into the same category as any candy bar. When they are unrefined, while they may contain some fiber, but better fiber can be found in virtually all vegetables and fruit. 

Did You Know?
"America is now the fattest country in the world and getting fatter every day." Executive of H.J. Heinz Co. Heinz has the franchise for Weight Watchers foods, with over 1 1/2 billion dollars in sales each year.
Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
 
Your information is wrong. It's fat hysterical propaganda designed as fear-mongering. If you read The Obesity Myth by Paul Campos or go to junkfoodscience.blogspot.com, you'll see that you can actually be fit and fat. It's physical fitness but the fascism that's already starting to take over the media and America refuses to acknowledge any balance of opinion. That you didn't dig deeper and actually try to research the crap displayed here is a sad commentary on the dumbing down of our society. Educate yourself and then relate!

Posted on 05/28/2008 at 6:05:43 PM

 
haha ur all fatasses

Posted on 01/16/2008 at 12:01:24 PM

 
Most overweight or fat women like the word big. The word "BBW" really represent the big/overweight/fat women. "BBW" also stands for "Big Black women", "Big breast women" and so on at largeplace.com.

Posted on 12/27/2007 at 2:12:20 AM

 
Pint Police. The figures are accurate. As a society, we have become so accustomed to looking at overweight people, we can no longer measure by eye what is overweight. The figures come from medical research. At 6', your son should weigh 170 lbs (and men of 6' generally weighed that 50 years ago. At 225 lbs, he will develop health problems, if he has not done so already. Check with a doctor who knows about these things.

Posted on 06/17/2007 at 7:06:00 PM

 
I also doubt some of the figures in your article where you are drawing the line at being medically obese. My son is 6', 225 pounds and looks very well built and athletic, not at all overweight, so compared to the example you gave of a man 5'11", 230 being medically obese, it just doesn't sound possible. What about BMI?

Posted on 06/17/2007 at 10:06:00 AM

 
oh heck! why bother?

Posted on 09/23/2006 at 8:09:00 AM

 
Thea, most doctors today know absolutely nothing about weight. They don't learn it at university. I learnt those figures at school last fall in a course, so I don't think they are wrong. The most you should weigh at 5'5" is 130. However, there are also electronic gadgets that will take your bone mass and your fat mass and tell you exactly how much fat your body is carrying.

Posted on 09/14/2006 at 11:09:00 PM

 
Interesting article, and well written, however I think your numbers may be a bit skewed -- I'm 5'5" - 5'6" (it depends on the day) and my midwife told me that at 126 pounds I was underweight. Now, at 155, I sit directly on the high end of ideal body weight according to my doctor.

Posted on 09/14/2006 at 9:09:00 PM

 
This article is about taking personal responsibility, not about condemning the obese.

Posted on 09/10/2006 at 10:09:00 PM

 
Cortney- I actually have an article titled "Fat Prejudice." Youa rticulated it perfectly. Tessa- If people feel comfortable with their size then why not just let it be? I know you say that "fat" people can't be happy with their weight, but my very thin, athletic friend would be considered obese with your weight calculations. There are so many ways to measure our health and this is simply one way and this way seems a little extreme.

Posted on 09/10/2006 at 10:09:00 PM

 
Dear S Thompson. In South Africa, I weighed 140 lbs. I am 5'4". The medical doctor who used an electronic instrument to measure my body fat told me I was obese and that I needed to lose weight. I don't think he was an idiot, but it's possible. My professor at school also recently told me that at 125 lbs with 28.8% body fat, I needed to lose weight - a good 8 lbs. So, while I realize it's difficult to believe that obesity is actually 'quite thin' in medical terms, doctors measure it differently to people who just look for vanity's sake. You might like to read these links: http://www.obesityfocused.com/about/definition-of-obesity.php http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/defining.htm http://news.yahoohttp://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060907/hl_afp/healthobesityaustraliaconference_060907101219.com/s/nm/20060818/hl_nm/obesity_dc The article, incidentally, is not prejudiced, by the way. Incidentally, I deleted the comments in order not to cause offense. Heather asked me

Posted on 09/10/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

 
"Fat" prejudice seems to be the last acceptable prejudice in the U.S. It's not ok to make racist jokes or gay jokes anymore (thank god), but for some reason it's still ok to deny someone a job for being overweight. This article is just another example of how overweight folks are pointed at and blamed for eating too mich every day. Not only are there medical reasons for obesity, but food is an addiction (illness) for some people like alcohol or cocaine are for others.

Posted on 09/10/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

 
I wondered if that was what happened, Heather. I don't understand why writers feel the need to delete comments that are critical of the author's viewpoints. In any case, I feel that this article is a poor representation of the facts. - Steve

Posted on 09/05/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

 
I agree with you S. Thompson and asked these questions myself, however the author chose to delete my comments and her replies as well.

Posted on 09/05/2006 at 10:09:00 AM

 
I really don't understand the evidence for this article. First of all, to call a woman who is 5'4'' and weighs 150 lbs obese is just ridiculous. You're telling me that 20 lbs is the difference between ideal weight and obesity? And secondly, to imply that someone who is "fat" can be neither happy nor attractive is extremely short-sighted. I'm curious to know what gives you authority on this subject. What about the people whose medical conditions cause them to gain weight? Or people whose necessary medications force them to lose weight? I get that weight can be an issue, but perhaps you could approach it from a more well-rounded and tactful perspective.

Posted on 09/04/2006 at 5:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
Most Commented On