Is Freedom of Movement a Human Right?

By Matthew Ryan, published Jan 11, 2008
Published Content: 65  Total Views: 5,478  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
I first became aware of this issue several months ago during a debate on the O'Reilly Factor between Kirsten Powers and Michelle Malken. Hot Air (one of my favorite blogs) has all the details here.

Anyway, in contrast to many of the commentators at Hot Air, I thought Kirsten Powers raised an interesting issue when she said that Freedom of Movement is a human right. At the very least, I think the concept of Freedom of Movement is one that I would like to explore.

Takeaways
  • Freedom of Movement versus an "overriding moral concern."
  • Freedom of Movement versus the global war on terror.
  • Intranational movement versus international movement.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
It amazes me that a country that once had no borders has found it's self in a position where border security is a debatable conversation. Of course a lot changes in 200 years. If a terrorist wanted into this country badly enough they would find a way. We haven't been able to stop thousands of illegal immigrants, what makes anyone think we could stop one terrorist? Freedom of Movement is an interesting topic. There always the question of what happened to "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door." Emma Lazarus is turning over in her grave.

Posted on 01/22/2008 at 5:01:52 AM

 
I have often wondered who gave humans the right to own land and govern. I am a whole earth flag waver. I accept that reality is we do have borders and countries and have no choice except to obey the laws as they now are. "Blind patriotism is worse than no patriotism at all" and it is those borders that cause most of the problems in the world. I think if there were no laws regarding which side of the street we could drive on, the majority of people would find it made sense if everyone traveling in the same direction stuck to the same side of the road. I see many drivers allow alternate feed when accidents make merging lanes necessary and many drivers who will wave a car on to make a turn into or out of a parking lot during rush hour traffic. Those things are common courtesy, not mandated by law.

Posted on 01/12/2008 at 10:01:32 AM

 
Interesting! I never gave such a thing a thought. However, is Nationalism, Sovereignty, and National Uniqueness such a bad thing? Free travel across boarders sounds like a precursor to the North American Union!

Posted on 01/12/2008 at 10:01:59 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On