The Madness of Ron Paul

Why Ron Paul's Politics Are Ludicrous

By Mark L., published Jan 11, 2008
Published Content: 47  Total Views: 23,299  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
Before the presidential campaign began, I had never heard of Ron Paul. But Ron Paul has burst onto the scene and gained a great deal of popularity. He's far from the front runner, but he has carved out a niche for himself amongst Americans who support small government. Hardly a day goes by when I don't see a "Vote Ron Paul" button or a sign that reads, "Google Ron Paul."

Ron Paul has high ideals. He believes in obedience to the Constitution, allowing the government to only take actions that the Constitution explicitly allows. It's a wonderful but blind ideal. So often, political debate in America turns to the question of what the founding fathers believed. My answer always is, who cares? They're dead, and they never lived in the 21st century, a time with a substantially different political environment then the 18th century. But Ron Paul wishes to throw us back into the past, ignoring the fact that times have changed.

The Constitution is an excellent document that establishes the processes of the government and protects civil rights. But it should be kept as a guideline. Rigid obedience to a document - especially one that is centuries old - is foolish. Ron Paul wants to throw pragmatism to the wolves. America has moved a great distance from its founding principles. Why? Because the people have forgotten where they come from? No, because times change, and the government has to change with them. Ron Paul puts philosophy over reality, and that's a dangerous thing to do.

Ron Paul also has the absurd idea of abolishing income tax. Nobody likes paying their taxes, but it's a necessary reality of the world. How would President Ron Paul run the government without money? Even with a small government, there are still government employees, officials, etc that have salaries. How does Ron Paul want to pay them?

Ron Paul has some rational ideas, such as state's rights. I can't argue with him on that. But on the whole, his politics are mostly absurd. If you're planning on voting for Ron Paul, I urge you to reconsider.

Comments
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
The responses here astound me. People assume that because I don't believe in blind adherence to the Constitution, I support all the corrupt and immoral practices of politicians. No, I do not support the war in Iraq, torture of prisoners, etc. One does not have to be a strict Constitutionalist to hold those views.

Posted on 01/18/2008 at 10:01:22 AM

 
Ron Paul- Goldfinger? http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/547375/ron_paul_goldfinger.html

Posted on 01/18/2008 at 10:01:27 AM

 
"If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed." - George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

Posted on 01/18/2008 at 7:01:18 AM

 
mostly absurd? aren't all politicians ideas MOSTLY absurd? "The Constitution is an excellent document that establishes the processes of the government and protects civil rights. But it should be kept as a guideline." Mark Leff. A guideline for what? Dumbass executive orders which ignore and defile the treatment of POW's? the constitution was a guideline for THAT? Or...take away civil liberties like PRIVACY? What part of the constitution was used as a guideline for that? Or LYING to americans on the premise for IRAQ? Is there a basic guideline in the constitution for that? Mark Leff, you are incredibly ignorant and you too are misleading Americans. If you vote for anyone other than Ron Paul, you may as well just commit suicide.

Posted on 01/17/2008 at 5:01:50 PM

 
Cynthia, I'm perfectly happy sticking to Constitutional values when those values are good for us in the modern world. The founding fathers had some beliefs that we in 2008 would find morally abhorrent. I don't see why we should be slaves to those ideals just because they were the ideals of our founders. As for income tax, I understand those who object to seeing their tax dollars lining the pockets of politicians instead of improving our country, but there are better solutions than abolishing income tax altogether. Ron Paul could propose to make the IRS more transparent, for example. Choosing to abolish it is another example of putting philosophy over pragmatism.

Posted on 01/17/2008 at 11:01:29 AM

 
I think that Ron Paul makes his stance loud and clear and I applaude him for his wanting to stick to our constitional values. I agree that he does fail to see some of the realities of what he wants to try to do. However, I think he is saying wake up Americans and get your heads out of the sand. Too many of us stand by and allow Government to keep taking and taking and taking. You tell me how is that right? The whole IRS and Federal Reserve was set up for a lot of Rich SElfish Government Pigs who didn't give a crap about any of the small Peons at the lower end of the scale. I am not saying that I totally support Ron Paul, however he does make some valid waves with me!!!

Posted on 01/17/2008 at 7:01:09 AM

 
Good article. Paul, like Perot, is an idealist. Laudable to be sure, but not possible given the world in which we live.

Posted on 01/13/2008 at 9:01:55 AM

 
You must be one of those guys that take orders well, falls in line with everyone else, and doesn't have the capability to think outside the box. What about the rest of America that can. What is so out of touch with Paul and the Constitution. Look at every Empire that tried to control the world...where did it get them? We have to get back to the principles of our founding fathers before we destroy ourselves.

Posted on 01/12/2008 at 9:01:44 AM

 
Thank you Mark, I wrote a similar article and could not agree with you more on this subject.

Posted on 01/11/2008 at 9:01:11 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Advertisment