War on Terror Just Getting Started

By Greg Reeson, published Jan 14, 2008
Published Content: 203  Total Views: 52,124  Favorited By: 15 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
In the introduction to Strategic Forecasting's 2008 forecast, Dr. George Friedman writes that "...the U.S.-jihadist war is entering its final phase," and that "...the destruction of al Qaeda's strategic capabilities now allows the United States to shift its posture...and enables Washington to begin drawing down its Middle Eastern forces." He could not be more wrong.

To begin, we are not fighting a "jihadist" war. We are fighting a global war on terrorism that involves the use of all the elements of national power: diplomatic, informational, military, and economic. Our fight is not just with the "jihadists" in the Middle East, but with those individuals worldwide that resort to terrorist tactics in pursuit of their political objectives. They could be Basque separatists in Spain, Taliban elements in Pakistan, or the Irish Republican Army in the United Kingdom. They could be Chechens operating from Georgian territory, Islamic fighters in the Philippines, or Kurdish rebels attacking Turkey from safe havens in northern Iraq. The notion that the U.S. effort against perpetrators of terrorism is entering its final phase is misguided, as is the belief that American forces will begin significantly drawing down troop levels in the Middle East.

The United States has already begun to redeploy some forces from Iraq, with one brigade that is not being replaced already at home and four more scheduled to come home without replacement by the summer. But the reality is that we will maintain far in excess of 100,000 troops there for the foreseeable future. The security gains achieved with additional troops and changed tactics could easily be lost if too many American forces are withdrawn before Iraqi forces are capable of stepping in for them. Political accommodation has begun at the local level in Iraq, but an outside arbiter of peace will be required for years to ensure that the country does not slide back toward civil war.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
While "war without end" is the desired status that the military/industrial complex seeks, those of us who can see past the thin veil can imagine taking real steps to end it. Of course, there are groups that need to be challenged, and sometimes engaged militarily. But the correct approach is to do that last, not first....and we also need a "war on the causes of terror" like unsatiable oil thirst and corporate greed. What we don't need are fear-mongering tactics like Thomas employs with his declaration that "we will be under the yoke of Islamic terrorists and their Sharia." Alyce sees the balance in approach that will lead to and end of "terror." Sure, Greg....there will always be people that resort to violence...but once we address the main issues, their numbers will shrink to become stricly law enforcement issues.

Posted on 01/16/2008 at 11:01:34 AM

 
If the US wants to end the war on terror they can pull our troops out of Iraq, make restitution to the country with $$$ and figure out how to end our country's dependency upon oil. Perhaps our past elected officials should not have been training terrorist here in the US and sending them back to their own countries afterwards thinking they had, I guess that was what they were thinking I do not know, they had helped the other countries. Radical Christian terrorists we are to the average citizen in those countries.

Posted on 01/15/2008 at 12:01:36 AM

 
Good writing. I still believe that terrorists are and will continue to infiltrate our country and try to break it apart from within. If we do not take this threat seriously, they will succeed and we will be under the yoke of Islamic terrorists and their Sharia.

Posted on 01/14/2008 at 5:01:14 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On