Ron Paul, Libertarian Dreams and Corporatist Realities

A Social Libertarian Perspective

By Dan Mage, published Jan 21, 2008
Published Content: 23  Total Views: 3,846  Favorited By: 17 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
I'm still undecided about Ron Paul. One thing can be said, however; whether you like him or not, he has brought the concept of libertarianism into the consciousness of mainstream America. Unfortunately, libertarianism is viewed as an antisocial philosophy by many (sometimes with justification), and in the case of Ron Paul, it has attracted many unsavory and antisocial people, including white supremacists and other denizens of the far-right lunatic fringe. Before continuing, I can say that as a Jew, the neo-Nazis are particularly offensive to me, but I still realize that their right to express their views is the same as mine. So does the ACLU, which is why they call themselves civil libertarians. But the Nazis and nutcases certainly are a political liability to Ron Paul and the cause of libertarianism in general. This can only help to further public misconceptions about libertarian ideology.

To get a balanced view of libertarianism, it becomes necessary to include all of its advocates and thinkers and view it within a historical context. A basic overview of libertarianism would include the following:

1. Libertarianism is, in fact, an American political tradition that was best expressed represented by Thomas Jefferson.

2. There is also a left wing of the libertarian movement. Some assert that the terms "Libertarian Socialism" and "Anarchism" are synonymous.

3. Libertarians of the left and right usually agree on one thing; that all violence, by both individuals, corporations, and the state, when used for anything other than defense against a direct physical attack, is a violation of the rights of both individuals and nations. Ron Paul's foreign policy objectives seem to be based on this principal.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
Dan, your writing is very insightful and you could be right on the point of corporations wanting government to take an active role in the economy If I were running a large company that went public I wouldn't want a strong Securities and Exchange Commission for example always on my back making sure I don't manipulate stock prices. Obviously consumers can self regulate by not buying a product if they sense some unethical behavior is taking place, but often times these movements that are talked about never get off the ground. Mass boycotts tend to take away freedom of choice, even though they sound great in some cases I guess I'm a little naive to still believe in things like the FDA and OSHA, I just really don't know who would be held accountable in a society where a right-ward leaning libertarian Dr. Paul were elected. We've had that brand of government in the early 1900's and it had some success, but I'm not sure I would want to revisit that brand of government if that makes se

Posted on 06/29/2008 at 4:06:27 PM

 
IN RE from Tyler"Your last paragraph on page five summed it up for me. I think Dr. Paul who claimed to be opposed to the corporate lobbyists and what not is truly going to give them what they want anyway and that's deregulation. The corporations could truly care less about the subsidies they get, they just want left alone and Paul would give them that in my view. " Well, some would definitely have a hard time without all the money that's being poured down the "defense" toilet. I kind of go along with Chomsky's view that big business has always favored a large powerful interventionist state, contrary to the standard conservative rhetoric. Expecting that the government can or will help workers at this point in history is a bad mistake. Corporations can be regulated, by massive refusals to spend, and refusals to work (strike and boycotts). Because they believe in "the market," speak to them in the language of the market.

Posted on 06/29/2008 at 12:06:21 AM

 
Your last paragraph on page five summed it up for me. I think Dr. Paul who claimed to be opposed to the corporate lobbyists and what not is truly going to give them what they want anyway and that's deregulation. The corporations could truly care less about the subsidies they get, they just want left alone and Paul would give them that in my view.

Posted on 06/28/2008 at 10:06:04 PM

 
Another Great piece.

Posted on 05/22/2008 at 11:05:33 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On