What Has the World Come To? Disney Bans Children

Disney bans children. Now that's a sentence I never thought I'd see in print. Granted it's only one restaurant, in one upscale resort. But a precedent has been set.

According to the Associated Press, the restaurant in question is Victoria & Albert's, Disney World's only five diamond restaurant. Victoria
 & Albert is located in the Grand Floridian Resort & Spa.

Meals at this high-dollar restaurant start at $125 a plate. Now, the truth be told, I will probably never take my children - at least as long as they are children - to a $125 a plate restaurant.

But that doesn't mean I'm not upset by the ban. Here's why:

Firstly, the name Disney, particularly Disney World or Disney Land, is synonymous with children. After all, it has made its money off children. So the thought that Disney would ban children from any part of Disney World or Disney Land (even if it is at the resort) just sounds out of place.

But Disney today is not the Disney of my youth. Their market has changed. Now Disney is targeting singles, young couples and other adults trying to relive their childhood. This strategy is evident in the number of adult-type entertainment being offered at the resorts.

Secondly, Disney World is a vacation spot. How many people go on vacation where they go out to dinner without their children? Sure, we have taken my mother on vacation with us so that my husband and I go out for a drink and a little alone time while on vacation, but dinners are still for the family. Besides how many parents can bring their own babysitter. Children 10 and under cannot be left alone.

I'm sure the resort probably offers some type of babysitting. I don't know about other parents, but I'm hesitant to leave my children with someone I don't know. And is the babysitting available during evening hours too?

Furthermore, I think it's elitist to say the parents with young children don't deserve to enjoy a night of fine dining. Rather than ban the three families a month that frequent this restaurant, why not offer a family dining section.

We've encountered these "family sections" at several restaurants we've eaten at during our vacations.

Related information
 
Comments 1 - 4 of 4  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Finally someone realizes that childless people deserve to enjoy a nice restaurant without the possibility of it being spoiled by people who can't or won't control their children. Bravo Disney!!!!

Posted on 03/27/2008 at 6:03:14 PM

Im sorry, mrs writer, but I agree with Disney, there are at least 150+ other restaurants in the Disney complex that are family restaurants, and Im very pleased to say that Victoria & Albert needed to be child-less!!! definitely you havent been in V&A! All the dining experience of this restaurant is so refined that what Disney achieved is a superb level of perfection, that only select palates will enjoym with all respect, not children population will enjoy these platters. Definitely being so abrupt and blind about the matter shows the limited capacity of understanding of the public. Yes, Disney does mean children, but also means the perfection and the highest standard that exists in the world. There is no company in the world (customer service oriented) that doesn't remark this company (Disney) as the top level in the market. If Disney have decided about this option definitely is thinking in pros and cons of that decision, thinking that this kind of matter beneficiates all the par

Posted on 01/25/2008 at 6:01:10 PM

Kat, me too. It seems that Disney World is no longer focused on being a "family destination."

Posted on 01/18/2008 at 7:01:42 AM

Wow, that's horrible. I automatically equate the word "Disney" with children.

Posted on 01/17/2008 at 7:01:57 PM

Comments 1 - 4 of 4