The History of Pants and Women Wearing Them



In the past pants have been referred to as breeches, trousers, and trews. Today women can choose from full leg, straight leg, capris, gauchos, jeans, and tailored suits. However, women were far behind men in taking to the tradition of the fashion staple we call pants. 

There is record of 4th Century Persian women wearing pants but that trend did not really catch on or travel to the Western World at that time. The first big rumblings of women wearing pants occurred at the end of the Victorian period. Ladies were getting a bit tired of heavy full skirts,
 whalebone corsets, cumbersome padding, bustles, and those multi-layered petticoats. Realistically and figuratively the garments were trapping women, keeping them down. Bloomers were soon introduced. Named after feminist advocate Amelia Jenks Bloomer, the outfit consisted of a knee length full skirt worn with full cut trousers underneath. Bloomers did not really become popular. 

The next attempt at bringing pants into the women’s fashion world was with the 1880’s and 1890’s bicycle outfit. Knee length knickerbockers were worn with a split wide skirt and stockings. Knickerbockers, or knickers, are full length breeches with a band just below the knee. The world of fashion tagged this outfit as un-ladylike and it did not become popular, either. 

Then came World War I. Women had to go into the factories to work the jobs of the absent men. They pulled back their hair and pulled off their skirts. Loose pants and pants similar to riding pants became part of the work attire. Lounge pj’s were often worn in the evening. Hollywood put their stamp of approval on pants when Marlene Dietrich donned a pair in the movie Morocco. When World War II began, Rosie the Riveter was seen on posters all over the country wearing overalls. 

Related information
  • There is record of women wearing pants in the 4th Century
  • Bloomers were the first attempt at pants
  • Marlene Dietrich helped make pants popular
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 52 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

OBASI & JOHN, may God help those that want to civilize the word of God. That is why the Scripture say in the Book of HOSEA 4:6, My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge....... I love u all

Posted on 06/21/2009 at 6:06:15 AM

Thank you for the verse in Ex. I have been looking for more answers to the question of pants in the bible.

Posted on 04/14/2009 at 8:04:32 AM

I was wondering, can anyone find me a good place online where I can find out about women wearing pants during the Womens Suffrage Era. Thtat would help me alot. Thanks.

Posted on 03/11/2009 at 11:03:04 AM

hi

Posted on 01/16/2009 at 1:01:57 PM

I haven't worn pants in many years, but I think if you really look in the Dueteronomy verse for its true meaning, I think you would find that it isn't talking about what you really think it is. You study it, I have many times. Find another verse to use, and make sure you know what it really means.

Posted on 01/09/2009 at 12:01:56 PM

Went a woman wear pants, it not a matter of what Deut 25;5 says or if it is the law of God or not, IS A MATTER OF GIVING TESTIMONY THAT YOUR BODY IS A TEMPLE OF GOD WHERE THE HOLLY SPIRIT DWELL IN YOU. AND AS THE BIBLE SAY, YOU ARE A OPEN LETTER .people should be able to read God in you. the matter is that went a woman wear pants some of them even in the house of the lord will wear them lose, But the young generation including older woman will wear them tie, making them self a instrument of the enemy making weak men sing, according to rom 1;24, dishonoring there body. 1% read the bible,99% read you

Posted on 11/27/2008 at 11:11:21 AM

If you're going to be literal about the Old Testament You'll have to join the Seventh-day Adventists who do not recognize that the Catholic Church did realize that though Jewish Christians did still go to the synagogue on the Seventh day; Gentile Christians "broke bread" on the first day of the week. WHen I was an Adventist we weren't allowed to wear pants but even they do now.

Posted on 11/09/2008 at 2:11:38 PM

In Deutoronomy 22:5 GOD ALMIGHTY said that a woman should not wear men's clothing, and vice versa. GOD made this command and HE did not even tell them what type of cloths the sexes is to wear. Common sense tells us that each sex is to wear clothes that is suitable to covering the respective parts of their bodies that needs covering, however, in Exodus 28:42 GOD instructed that linen breeches be made for Aaron and his sons. That in my understanding makes the issue of breeches-trousers-pants, a man's clothing, so while you say that society dictates what we wear, the fact is society means individuals like you and me, and so when someone has an idea for a style, we must ask the question, who or what influenced that thought and if for one moment you think that things just happen, that an idea just comes out of thin air, then think again, get the facts. Women wearing pants in America came about because of people like Kathleen Hepburn who excited women that viewed her in a certain movie weari

Posted on 10/26/2008 at 12:10:18 PM

It is true that we are not under the law but under the grace,mind you that Christ has redeemed us from yhe curse of the law but not on the commandments of the law.The laws remains the foundation of the Lord that standeth sure,Know that the Lord knows them that are His,depart from iniquity/aborminations if you have the Lord's name upon you.Women wearing pants is an abomination Deut 22:5,and no aborminable will inherity God's kingdom Rev 22:8,The aborminable must enter hell fire if they repent not.Grace is an ability,strenght through Christ to keep all the commands of the Lord,It is never a lincvence to dress and behave any how.Men has standards and even dress codes,Is it the awsome being of heaven that will tolorate anyhow dressing.Please ammend your ways for a siiner is not a christain neither a chrisrtain a sinner.1John3-9. Thanks

Posted on 10/23/2008 at 6:10:04 AM

I WAS INTRODUCED TO THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH AT A YOUNG AGE. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THE KIND OF PERSON TO DIG DEEP AND FIND MEANING, TO NOT JUST DO WHAT SOMEONE SAYS, TO NOT JUST BE ANOTHER FOLLOWER. I WEAR PANTS SOMETIMES SIMPLY BECAUSE I WISH TO BE COMFORTABLE THAT DAY. WHAT YOU PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND IS THAT THERE WERE PEOPLE HERE BEFORE YOU WHO SET RULES FOR WHATEVER REASONS AND NO GOD DOES NOT CHANGE BUT PEOPLE DO. MAYBE IN THE PAST WOMEN WERE EXPECTED TO WEAR SKIRTS SIMPLY BECAUSE THATS WHAT SOMEONE SAID, WE DO NOT KNOW. ALL I KNOW IS THAT WE DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO CALL SOMEONE A HEATHEN BECAUSE THEY WEAR PANTS. REMEMBER THE SCRIPTURE ALSO SAYS " JUDGE NOT THAT YE BE NOT JUDGED" IT ALSO SAYS " WHERE THERE IS NO LAW THERE IS NO SIN" MEANING IF YOU DON'T FORCE SOMETHING ON SOMEONE YOU JUST MIGHT NOT HAVE CONFRONTATION OF DISAGREEMENT! NOW LETS BE HONEST DOES THE SCRIPTURES SAY THAT " PANTS IS A MAN'S GARMENT... NO , SOCIETY SAYS THIS. IT IS SOCIETY THAT GIVES MAKES IT THE NORM . IN I

Posted on 10/02/2008 at 10:10:42 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 52 Next >>