Why I Am Pro-Euthanasia

By Tara Cellars, published Jan 23, 2008
Published Content: 89  Total Views: 80,842  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.3 of 5
Euthanasia is a very touchy topic for most people. Everyone has an opinion of the topic, which is their right. I have a differing opinion than most because I am in fact pro-euthanasia. Before anyone comments saying, "What are you thinking please read on." Euthanasia is defined as the "intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit" (Euthanasia.com, n.d.). Just from the definition, it is my honest opinion that when they mention omission, I think of a DNR on patients. A DNR is a legal document that a person has signed stating that they do not want to be resuscitated. When someone stops breathing and their heart stops everyone is resuscitated and their life is at least attempted to be saved unless they have a DNR. In a sense, a DNR is assisted suicide. This is the whole reason why I am pro-euthanasia.

If you are terminally ill, why would you want to be brought back to live in pain? For instance, when CPR is done, and done right the majority of the time ribs are bruised and broken. So not only with the terminal patient be in pain from whatever disease they have, they will have this pain on top of that. Why is it right for anyone to say that it is not ok for someone to die? Who honestly has that right? God and only God. My father has signed a DNR, my mother has signed one, and my husband and I are going to. Does that make people think that we want to die? Or that we are committing suicide when we die? There are so many bigger questions that need to be answered.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
i dont understand why chest pain would be a reason not to want to be brought back to life if it is possible.I think its fine if the only possible way you can live is through a machine and your brain dead but chest pain thats the most arrogant reason to let someone die

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 1:07:40 PM

 
i think that it is the right of the people to chose whether or not the suffering is worth living. if not, it is their right to tell the doctor to kill them. if they are against it then they should not be killed and that area should be illegal..

Posted on 06/09/2008 at 9:06:02 AM

 
I don't understand why someone, after having a heart attack, would choose not to be saved. CPR has saved many people and doesn't always have a negative affect on someone. In having a DNR, you take the risk of not being able to see your family and friends again, just because of the possibility that something might go wrong. Choosing not to be saved by an easily and commonly preformed procedure is the difference of being able to see your husband or parents again. When you have people depending on you, and you choose not to be saved, it is the same as abandoning those you love.

Posted on 05/20/2008 at 2:05:25 PM

 
having a DNR in your possession is in no way the same as having a PAS. Having a heart atack is out of any bodys control and is a natural occurance. Having someone murder you because your to ill to think rationally is both sick and unprofessional. You say god is the only one to make and take a life, so have him take it, not you. PS keep your DNR handy bc if you dont have it on you while the medics are on scene, they will resuscitate you and the world will have to continue comming to your blog thinking their getting an educated opinion.

Posted on 04/16/2008 at 10:04:20 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On