Is Barack Obama the Second Coming of John F. Kennedy?

By Mark Whittington, published Jan 27, 2008
Published Content: 616  Total Views: 517,494  Favorited By: 27 CPs
Rating: 2.6 of 5
The Democrats have been yearning for the return of Camelot, which is to say that mystical, half remembered epic that was the thousand days of the John F. Kennedy Presidency since they put the slain martyr into the ground at Arlington.

The list of politicians that have been designated to bear the mantle of our modern King Arthur is long, ranging from brothers Bobby and Teddy, to John Kerry. Even Jimmy Carter, for a half second during the 1976 campaign, was compared to JFK.

So it shouldn't be surprising when Caroline Kennedy opined the following:

"Over the years, I've been deeply moved by the people who've told me they wished they could feel inspired and hopeful about America the way people did when my father was president. This sense is even more profound today. That is why I am supporting a presidential candidate in the Democratic primaries, Barack Obama."

Barack Obama has a gotten down the Kennedy style pretty well. He's handsome, can give a great speech, and has a beautiful family. Obama comes across as so likeable that even the most hard core conservative, while knowing that Obama's policies would wreck the Republic, admit to having warm, fuzzy feelings about the man. The fact that Obama is running against the Lady Macbeth of the 21st Century, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is icing on the cake. Many conservatives are praying that Obama beats Hillary just so that the cancer of the Clintons can be removed from the body politic.

But is Barack Obama the reincarnation of John F. Kennedy? On even cursory examination, the answer, with all due respect to Ms. Kennedy and her Uncle Ted, who will endorse Obama, is no.

Take foreign policy, for example. John F. Kennedy was a hawk. Obama, on the other hand, thinks that the way to solve problems with our enemies is to just-well-talk to them. Worse of all he is for a total bug out of Iraq, even on the brink of victory. So much for, "pay any price, bear any burden in the defense of liberty."

Domestic policy is even worse. John F. Kennedy was in favor of cutting taxes across the board, even using rhetoric that presaged Ronald Reagan. Obama, on the other hand, wants to raise taxes across the board.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
 
Sigh... Kennedy set a human lunar goal in order to demonstrably defeat the Soviets in a contest of missile technology superiority. In the absence of such a Cold War driver, why should Obama, or any Presidential candidate, support a human lunar program that's only going to repeat what the U.S. accomplished a half century ago? What a waste of money...

Posted on 02/19/2008 at 12:02:19 PM

 
Draw your own conclusions, Mark (smile)... Please read and think about "Camelot Revised" at http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/583261/john_f_kennedy_robert_f_kennedy_barack.html and let me know what you think. Regards, Michael

Posted on 02/06/2008 at 10:02:49 PM

 
Bush wants tax cuts to the top 3% of wealth holders made permanent. Obama thinks that should be reversed with the rich paying there fair share and giving the tax cuts to the middle class as it should be. I have seen coming to pass in my lifetime the government "plot" to tax the middle class out of existence. Even Bill Clinton was inspired by JFK by dodging the draft. I think the "second coming" is exaggerated thinking. The ability to inspire and motivate people is where the comparison comes in to play. A man in France likened Obama to Bobby Kennedy. Others see him as a Dr. King look alike. I see a bit of Malcolm X in him with the "just say no to drugs" type messages. What I see is the little boy who stood up and shouted: But the Emperor has no clothes on. It is Kucinich, not Obama who calls for immediate pull out of all our troops. Obama knows we can not just walk away from the mess we made of that country. Diplomacy first is always the best way, btw.

Posted on 01/29/2008 at 2:01:46 AM

 
As far as Obama calling for change. I am sure the change he has in mind would result in an outcome similar to the change Jimmy Carter brought America as opposed to the change Ronald Reagan brought to clean that mess up. A broken leg is change, falling off a lasdeer is change, bubonic plague is change. Death is change. Change is not a sufficient condition in and of itself. I am afraid we cannot afford to let Obama play with the ship of state, we do not have another Reagan waiting in the wings to help it get unstuck. You think the poor are suffering now? Let Obama make his changes and watch them and us in the middle class suffer again like we did in the late 70's. Liberals talk helping the poor and then go after the nasty rich. Then the nasty rich take their money and jobs ovearseas and leave the poor unempolyed. That sure helps. Liberals woud rather we all be poor than one person be rich. Alyce, I suggest you read "Atlas Shrugged" sometime. I think it might open y

Posted on 01/28/2008 at 10:01:02 PM

 
Alyce, If you want to spend money on the poor, I suggest you sell your computer, a result of the Apollo program, and all your other worldly possessions. Then move back to the rift valley in Africa our ancestors walked out of before solving all the Earth's problems. Please stay there until you have solved all of the worlds problems. The get back to us via carrier pigeon and let us know how it is working out.

Posted on 01/28/2008 at 9:01:14 PM

 
Democrats said these same things about Clinton 1 in 1992, and look how many of them want to tear the Clintons down now.

Posted on 01/28/2008 at 5:01:40 PM

 
It is good of you to raise these questions without resorting to the cheap shots many people are taking at Obama. Personally, i've no problem with the man except that all I am positive he wants to do is...change. That is the one commodity he claims to have in abundance. He's definately a classy guy, but I can't shake the feeling that he's full of it.

Posted on 01/28/2008 at 1:01:09 PM

 
...the planet one way or another.

Posted on 01/27/2008 at 8:01:17 PM

 
GWB gives tax cuts to the richest 3% of wealth holders in the USA. Obama (and others) wants to take back those breaks and give them instead to the middle and lower class, as it should be in a fair society. The best cost saving item would be to end the war in Iraq which has us indebted to China as well as sends home many more disabled young people that the gov will need to support~not that it pays them for their earned health care benefits~best to pay well those that administer the program. Some, like Senator Clinton have already given GWB the go-ahead into Iran, which might make everyone's petty bickering silly when super powers decide to put an end to our greedy grab for all the oil. I do not know much about the moon program, but maybe it is a good idea to feed the hungry and house the homeless and take care of the unhealthy before we spend more money and use up more oil...I am sure those wealthy that already paid will be space bound while the rest of stay here on earth as we destroy

Posted on 01/27/2008 at 8:01:58 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 9 of 9
 
Most Commented On