A Look Behind the Workplace Religious Freedom Act
What it Means, and Why it May Be Necessary
By James Sherwood, published Sep 05, 2006
Published Content: 51 Total Views: 44,301 Favorited By: 0 CPs
In particular, the First Amendment only guarantees the freedom to worship and to have one’s beliefs honored by the government. The government is expressly forbidden to select one religion as a national faith and may not, as currently limited, prohibit the free exercise of religion save when that exercise unfairly harms another (i.e. human sacrifice, although a part of several ancient religions, is banned on the grounds of murder). However, private enterprise has no such restrictions. For many years, it was not only allowable but acceptable to discriminate based on faith. Jews, Protestants, Catholics: all have been vilified at some time or another.
In 1964, with the passage of the Civil Rights Act, this practice was banned as well. Religion was expressly listed as a civil right that neither government nor business could legally infringe upon. And though hundreds of cases since then have proved that people (and government) still do, the courts have routinely backed the law. But, in this new world, where people of certain faiths are looked upon with revulsion, as an enemy, the older and less civilized practices are beginning to come back to haunt us.
You may also like...
- Religious Freedom Law Signed by Then Governor George Bush to Be Interpreted by Texas Supreme Court
- Religious Freedom: Whose Rights Are They Anyway?
- Oregon V. Smith: Substance Use (and Abuse?) in Religious Ceremonies
- Why Religious Freedom is One of the Cornerstones of Our Society
- Freedom of Religion Dosen't Apply to Rastafarians?
- Warrior Spirituality: Religious Freedom from Spiritual Identity to Spiritual Action
- Children and Parents - Religious Fights Over Medical Rights
- European Sex Worker Conference: George W. Bush and the War on Whores
- Visit Devils Tower in Wyoming - Balancing Religion and Recreation
- Pagans to Rally for Religious Rights in Front of the White House on July 4th
Takeaways
- The WRFA is an extension of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
- The WRFA is opposed by big business and by the ACLU.
- The complaints against it seem to be spurious.
Did You Know?
In 2004, there were 137 civil rights lawsuits filed. They represented nearly half a million people..
Resources
- capwiz.com/narla/home/ The North American Religious Liberty Association Legislative Action Center www.nna.org/GR/workplacereligion.htm The National Newspaper Association (a non-profit association of major news dailies) and the story behind WRFA
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Most Commented On

