Find » Sports » NCAA Approves Four New Bowl Games, ...

NCAA Approves Four New Bowl Games, Increasing the Lineup to 32 Games

Bowl Extravaganza Has Gotten Out of Hand with Too Many Games

By robert birge, published Sep 05, 2006
Published Content: 43  Total Views: 16,666  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.2 of 5
Enough, already!

Showing that it can always find a way to ruin a good thing, the NCAA approved four new bowl games in the offseason, increasing the bowl lineup to 32 games over a three-week stretch from December 19-January 8.

Now I love college football as much as anybody, but this is too much. I also love ice cream but it doesn't mean that I eat a gallon of it every night. Too much of a good thing can be a bad thing. In the case of the bowl games, less would definitely be more.

There are 119 teams in Division I-A, which means more than half of them will play in a bowl game this season. Getting selected to play in a bowl used to be about rewarding a school for an outstanding season, but now it rewards mediocrity. With 64 slots to fill, merely finishing with a winning record virtually guarantees a team a bowl invitation somewhere.

Bowl games added this year include the New Mexico Bowl, the International Bowl (to be played in Toronto) and the Birmingham Bowl, in addition to a fifth game in the Bowl Championship Series. Now, I can live with another game in the BCS because it will provide more of an opportunity for a worthy team from a non-BCS conference (of course, it doesn't move us any closer to a playoff to decide college football's national champion).

The power conferences - Southeastern, Atlantic Coast, Big 12, Pac-10, Big 10 and Big East, along with Independent Notre Dame - rule college football and the NCAA as a whole. The NCAA added a fifth BCS game in part to alleviate criticism that the BCS is a monopolistic system designed to ignore the lesser conferences. Again, I have no problem with that. Actually, I'd prefer to see an undefeated team from a non-BCS conference (Western Athletic, Mountain West and Conference USA) rather than a sixth- or seventh-place team from one of the major conferences.

But some of the these bowl games have to go, and take the sponsors with them. Do we really need the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsetta Bowl (December 19)? Or the Pioneer Pure Vision Las Vegas Bowl (December 21). Would the Earth spin off its axis if the Emerald Bowl (set for December 27 in San Francisco) ceased to exist?

Comments
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
more bowls? aaahhhh! go have mercy for the ncaa has lost their friggin' minds! nobody will watch them except for curiosity and will be a total waste of air time and money.

Posted on 09/12/2006 at 10:09:00 AM

 
I don't see how this is any worse than any other sport's postseason. Actually I think it's better. The NBA and NHL both allow over half of their teams into the postseason and the NFL nearly half. The difference is college football doesn't give all those teams a shot at the Championship, just two of them. Why should the 12th place team in the NFL or the 16th place team in the NBA deserve a shot at the championship. I also don't see what so many bowl games has to do with making it less exciting, if say Ohio State and Florida are playing, then that has nothing to do with whether Ball State and Fresno State played each other the week before.

Posted on 09/07/2006 at 10:09:00 AM

 
I absolutely agree with you regarding the glut of bowl games. The selection process is awful too. Penn State gets rewarded for a 10-1 season by playing a 4-loss Florida State team?! Terrible! At least in the old days (I'm talking pre-Bowl Alliance, pre-Bowl Coalition), the games were much more evenly matched. I hate the fact that the Big Ten cannot play an ACC team in a bowl because of the pre-set conference bowl lineups. I can go on and on, but I won't. Good article!

Posted on 09/06/2006 at 8:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Advertisment