Racial Divide or Survival of the Fittest?

Is the New Survivor Tribe Division a Racial Ploy or a Ploy for Ratings?

By Rica, published Sep 05, 2006
Published Content: 1,579  Total Views: 810,685  Favorited By: 15 CPs
Rating: 2.8 of 5
Is it really racial divide or survival of the fittest? And are we talking about contestants or reality shows? In what appears to be an attempt to surpass their depressed ratings, “Survivor” The Reality Show has chosen to divide the participants of the 13th season into tribes based on race. The new season shot in Cook Islands in the South Pacific begins September 14th. There will be four tribes consisting of African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos, and White contestants. Many viewers and some community leaders are in an uproar over this decision citing it as wrong, and if they had their way it would not happen. The host Jeff Probst stated this particular approach was taken because of cries that the show was not diverse enough and cites the choice of division as a social experiment. My question is who really is the social experiment? Is it the contestants and the way they will play off of each other, or is it America observing as social scientist viewing the contestants as laboratory rats? When you think about it, aren’t we all laboratory rats to the networks?

Takeaways
  • In all fairness is it really about race?
  • Oh yeah there is an "R" world but it's not race. Can you say "ratings?"
  • Color or gender won't matter, it will be about survival of the fittest.
Did You Know?
Could it be the locations are getting more exotic?
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On