What a Real Economic Stimulus Package Should Look Like

The Current Economic Stimulus Proposal is Inadequate

By A. Hermitt, published Feb 04, 2008
Published Content: 1,167  Total Views: 1,565,211  Favorited By: 90 CPs
Rating: 4.2 of 5
As you are probably aware, the President introduced a bill that would give most Americans a few hundred dollars each in the hopes of stimulating the economy. Besides the fact that my buying a flat screen TV with the money given to my family of four would most likely benefit someone in a foreign country, I can see how this band-aid is going to the gaping wound that is the economy.

The current plan that is still being picked apart and altered as I write this suggests that individuals get $600.00 for individuals, $1200 for couples, and $300.00 for children. The families would have to make less than $150,000.00 a year and individuals less than $75,000.00. These caps and the actual amounts given out will probably change drastically before the package is complete.

In my opinion, the government can do so many other things besides sticking a dollar bill in a proverbial dyke. This country is literally falling apart. People's home lives are falling apart. Homeowners are losing their homes. Giving people a few hundred dollars and telling them to go shop is the same as putting gasoline in a car that needs oil. Here is an idea I consider a real economic stimulus package:

In short, the government should immediately stop all foreclosures for a period of 60 days. In those two months, each family (besides those deemed completely financially irresponsible) should be given a one-time bail out to get their mortgages on track. Loans that cannot be caught up with two months payment should be allowed to have the rest of the overage re-aged.

But what about those people who are not in danger of foreclosure or whose homes have already been foreclosed you ask? These people should be able to apply for money to decrease their credit card or other debts.

All of these people should have their interest rate on their homes of credit cards lowered to match current market rates. There should also be a cap on these bailouts, as someone who is living in a home that they could never really afford in the first place really should downsize.

How is this idea better than the current stimulus package idea?

Did You Know?
A shopping spree is not what is needed. People need to save their homes and lower their debt.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
I work in the financial services industry, and I have to say that I agree with you 100%. People need financial relief where it is really going to help them now and in the long run, not tell them to go on a shopping spree when they are in massive debt, losing their homes (if they can get into a home in the first place), not saving for their futures, and not educating themselves. Unfortunately I am afraid that many people who were given a chance to get back on track and get out of debt will just end up in the exact same situation if they do not learn and apply proper money-management skills.

Posted on 05/26/2008 at 8:05:49 PM

 
Excellent article!

Posted on 05/13/2008 at 4:05:44 AM

 
Cool article, some good ideas!

Posted on 05/07/2008 at 6:05:25 PM

 
Unfortunately, at this point in history, the governments of nations, including our own, answer to a global elite that is without loyalty to anything but its own interests. Groups like the WTO, World Bank, IMF, and the various multinational corporations exert a quasi-governmental form of centralized econonomic control (while claiming to champion a "free market"), and countries that don't cooperate simply find that businesses and money end up going elsewhere. The policies dictated by these groups have generally been in favor of hardships for the poor to middle classes, and subsidies for the rich.

Posted on 03/07/2008 at 11:03:19 PM

 
Interesting idea, but I think your plan probably would destroy the banking industry, causing more economic harm than good. The gov needs to balance the needs of both individuals and the banks, but it's tough to do. In the end, I doubt the government has enough money to stimulate the economy anyway. The "stimulus" package just looks good politically.

Posted on 03/04/2008 at 7:03:29 PM

 
I would just as soon the government evaluate every single department and see where waste can be cut. Everyone would have to agree there is tremendous waste in Washington. Do away with the earmarks for five years and let our economy try to rebound. Will Congress be able to stop their spending? Not likely. www.arizonahomeownerinsurance.biz/arizona_auto_insurance.php

Posted on 02/23/2008 at 5:02:17 PM

 
Good points, but I guess they didn't listen. :( - I will enjoy the money they will give us, but if it's going to hurt the economy in the long run, I'd rather they kept it and put it toward something useful.

Posted on 02/18/2008 at 6:02:26 PM

 
I hear you.

Posted on 02/05/2008 at 12:02:19 AM

 
Maybe the government should listen to the people but that mean being of the people, by the people, for the people but why would we want to go back to the olden days when we'ver come ths far. Great article and great ideas, ever thinking of running for office?

Posted on 02/04/2008 at 6:02:27 PM

 
Some good points -- though unfortunately unlikely as bailouts seem to be the domain of airlines and banks.

Posted on 02/04/2008 at 2:02:21 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On