The Legacy of John Mark Karr: Time to Do Away with 24 Hour News Networks?

By Timothy Sexton, published Sep 07, 2006
Published Content: 2,687  Total Views: 2,366,240  Favorited By: 213 CPs
Rating: 3.5 of 5
MSNBC WAS FIRST TO BREAK THE NEWS OF JOHN MARK KARR ARREST

I just wanted to remind you of that. After all, MSNBC constantly reminded us of that fact during the last week. I have my doubts they will continue to remind us. So I will.

John Mark Karr got his fifteen minutes of fame and then some. In fact, in all likelihood this nerd received more air time on the 24 hour news channels than the genocide in Darfur, the fact that a US judge declared Pres. Bush’s NSA domestic spying program unconstitutional, or the report issued by the minority members of the House Justice Committee providing incontrovertible evidence that the White House misled the American public and Congress about the need to invade Iraq.

The question that must be asked at this point: Is it time to shut down the 24 hour news channels?

Quite obviously there is a real and pressing need for 24 hour news. Goodness knows, it’s not as if there isn’t enough going on in the world that 24 hours is too much time to cover it. The problem, however, is that none of these 24 hour news channels—neither CNN, MSNBC, or, especially, Fox—cover most of that news. Instead of reporting on substantive events taking place around the world, we get live updates on what alcoholic beverages a confessed killer was served on board the plane bringing him home.

MSNBC WAS FIRST TO BREAK THE NEWS OF JOHN MARK KARR ARREST.

The Legacy of John Mark Karr: Time to Do Away with 24 Hour News Networks?
The Legacy of John Mark Karr: Time to Do Away with 24 Hour News Networks?

CNN covers the most important news of the day at 11:05 on August 29.

Credit: Timothy Sexton

Copyright: Timothy Sexton

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I understand the repetition on a big story - people around the country and world tune it at different times. If you wanted to know what was going on with something and tuned it and didn't hear mention of the Big Story of the Day for 4 hours, you'd be pissed at that too. (Of course, if you really wanted to try for info, you'd get online and READ.) But the non-stop coverage when there is no information to report is definitely ridiculous and they do ask assinine questions of people who couldn't possibly know the answers because they too don't have any facts yet.

Posted on 09/09/2006 at 11:09:00 PM

 
Thanks for saying exactly what I was thinking

Posted on 09/07/2006 at 1:09:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On