Find » Opinion/Editorial » It is Time for the Consumption Tax

It is Time for the Consumption Tax

Income Taxes Have Become Too Complex and Unfair. Let's Tax What is Spent!

By marindavid, published Jan 31, 2008
Published Content: 572  Total Views: 328,580  Favorited By: 339 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.9 of 5
The Federal Income Tax, since it's first categorical introduction following the ratification of the 16th Amendment to the US Constitution in 1913, has been nearly equally unpopular and the subject of resentment and scorn for everyone who pays any. Both the rich and the less well off feel that they money they earn is unfairly and inequitably taken from them by the government. Much has been written about this and a plethora of tax 'reform' suggestions appears every highly political year (like this one, 2008!) Somehow, though, no matter how well or honestly intentioned, most of these proposals tend to miss the two underlying points.

The first is that there MUST be taxes of some sort if people expect, as they all do, their government to provide services they feel are imperative that they are not able to secure for themselves. Short of this, we would be left with a type of fiscally feudal anarchy in which the rich would survive and the less well fixed would simply expire. The second and equally important (but oft overlooked) reality is that taxing income (money earned) is a paradigm concept that is impossible to administer fairly no matter what tax 'plan' is brought to the fore.

The Income Tax Laws of this country are so complex, as to render them essentially incomprehensible to even the most educated among us. The volumes and volumes of regulations, conditions, caveats and exceptions to the once basic formula for taxation of income have become so compounded by (and for) attorneys, tax experts and the exceedingly wealthy, as to render them tantamount to laws under which we all live that few of us have the capacity to understand. It has become a game. The prize is to earn more while paying less. The winners are, inevitably, those with the resources to mobilize the expertise it takes to understand how to win without going to jail. This is conspicuously unfair to the rest of us.

It is Time for the Consumption Tax

It shouldn't be as complex or as complicated as Income Taxes make it to fund government and necessary services. Time to give the Consumption Tax a try!

Credit: taf.org

Copyright: taf.org

Takeaways
  • Income Tax can never be 'fair'
  • With taxes, simpler is better
  • Tax what we spend, not what we earn
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
 
I hate the consumption tax idea Modifications to our tax system should be focused on making it more progressive and increase the tax burden on the people with the ability to pay (as our income tax, as imperfect as it may be, does) . A consumption tax is the reverse - regressive. If you replace (or add to) the sales taxes with a consumption tax the burden of that tax would be felt by the people who can afford it the least. If I'm making 200 grand and filling my Bentley up with $3 gas and paying a $1 consumption tax on top of that for a total of $4 a gallon do you think that is better or worse than the current income tax? (don't fight the hypo - I know that people who own bentleys don't pump their own gas and therefore have no idea how much it costs) What about the single mom holding two jobs making $20 grand a year - think that extra $1 hurts her?- you betcha. An extra dollar consumption tax on each gallon of gas would force people making only 20 grand a year to choose between

Posted on 06/05/2008 at 7:06:08 PM

 
Great article! You might like to read this other great writer's view on the subject http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/507493/obama_and_huckabee_on_face_the_nation.html

Posted on 02/08/2008 at 11:02:17 AM

 
Great idea.

Posted on 02/04/2008 at 11:02:36 PM

 
Interesting concept. I think Huckaby was touting this earlier this year. Thank You fer sharin'. Mizpah. ;-}}>

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 11:02:52 AM

 
From what I hear it sounds like a really good idea. Some say it is unfair to the poor and in some instances it may be. Regardless, it is likely that we will never see it happen. Great article!

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 5:02:13 PM

 
Nope. At least not the way I was considering it. It WOULD replace Income Taxes and Sales Taxes - but not, necessarily the other sources of revenues you mentioned. By eliminating one set of known inequities, another set of lesser known ones would take their place. Sure. Question remains: Are we certain that the known problems are preferable to the unknown and perhaps more solvable ones of a new idea? Rob: Had you posted your note/comment with your actual pen name or posted it 'live' I would have sent you a personal reply to your thoughtful note. As it is, I can only hope that you will check back for a response. Sincerely, David

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 12:02:17 PM

 
There are several issues a consumption tax posses for its supporters: 1. OTHER TAXES Since it would replace the income tax, would it also replace state taxes, sales taxes, user fees, and other taxes like telecommunication charges. On average Americans pay .32 cents of every dollar earned for all taxes and public/private user fees. That means for the Public Sector a consumption tax would have to approximate at least .23 cents on the dollar. The other .09 cents if eliminated would likely be absorbed in higher prices for private sector utility, and telecommunication services. 2. BUSINESS CONSUMPTION. Since there are tiny to megolithic business enterprises will there need to be a progressive consumption tax system just for these producers? A mom&pop store buying one freezer would pay more than Food Lion who gets a quantity discount on 100 freezers. Would there be a system of tax rebates based on net sales revenue/income, etc.? 3. Because the consumption tax would be collec

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 10:02:08 AM

 
I am in complete agreement that a Consumption Tax would need to take into acount the circumstances of the poor who must spend everything they earn to survive! It wouldn't be simple to figure out, but it is hard to imagine a system less fair and less understandable than the one we currently have. As I said in the piece, it seems certainly worth a try! Thanks, everyine, for your thoughtful reflections on this important issues.

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 9:02:41 AM

 
The main objectors against the consumption tax are advocates of the poor. All us good hearted people want them to get a free ride. A consumption tax would make them pay their fare. That would be terrible.

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 9:02:07 AM

 
Interesting!

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 7:01:06 PM

 
For a consumption tax to be acceptable I would like to see a few things...first, nutrionally good foods (not bigmacs) should be exempt,,,and it should be very high for things that are environmentally damaging...and there should be a "luxury tax" component to it also...

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 6:01:57 PM

 
Very interesting read. You have a lot of good points.

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 4:01:27 PM

 
It will never happen because the minimum wage income tax is nearly as much as the middle class income tax as far as totall revenues. In my opinion minimum wage should be tax free and the very wealthy should make up the difference and NOT---the middle class; but that's just an opinion. As for the "consumption tax"; this is a great idea and it can be successfull if we really take the time work out all the details because it would be fair if we did. My only reservation is how it will apply to very poor people and those on government aid or disability and social security. They have no income tax and if the burden of taxation is shifted to "consumption" then they would in a sense have their income taxed (so to speak) and it could have a negative impact. But like I said, I know what you refer to in your vision would also work out the details and make adjustments accordingly. We are so afraid of change, I think we should give it a try, we can always change back. *****

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 1:01:03 PM

 
Yes, this is a great idea---with one reservation--I'll get to that. David, the whole tax thing is unfair no matter what--it will never be perfect, but there is no getting around it--it is necessary as you pointed out. I think of two American ideals when I think about "fairness" in taxes; the first is the founding principal of our republic that is that everbody is free to reach their potential and therefore those who succeed should not be penalized for doing it---basically a flat tax philosophy that we all should be treated exactly the same; the second is just as American, but is based on a social and moral obligation not to let poor people starve and also on the standard of living which basically is to tax according to how much you earn---rich people paying much more than poor people. I think we kind of do both things currently, but I would like to see a more honest approach that completely abolishes income tax below a certain income---but that will never happen.

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 1:01:33 PM

 
Interesting idea. People might learn to live with less material possessions with this tax plan. Might even help the environment, too! I don't really mind paying taxes; it's a necessary evil. I just wish the government would quit throwing so much of it down the drain!

Posted on 01/31/2008 at 12:01:54 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 19
Next >>
Advertisment