The Evolution of Evil

Plutocracy Controls Politics

Perhaps a global political apocalypse has already arrived.

Activists and dissidents should understand that evil forces and tyrannical governments have evolved. Just as human knowledge and science expand, so do the strategies and instruments used by rulers, elites and plutocrats. By learning from history and using new
technology they have smarter tools of tyranny. The best ones prevent uprisings, revolutions and political reforms. Rather than violently destroy rebellious movements, they let them survive as marginalized and ineffective efforts that divert and sap the energy of nonconformist and rebellious thinkers. Real revolution remains an energy-draining dream, as evil forces thrive.

Most corrupt and legally sanctioned forms of tyranny hide in plain sight as democracies with free elections. The toughest lesson is that ALL elections are distractions. Nothing conceals tyranny better than elections. Few Americans accept that their government has become a two-party plutocracy run by a rich and powerful ruling class. The steady erosion of the rule of law is masked by everyday consumer freedoms. Because people want to be happy and hopeful, we have an epidemic of denial, especially in the present presidential campaign. But to believe that any change-selling politician or shift in party control will overturn the ruling class is the epitome of self-delusion and false hope. In the end, such wishful thinking perpetuates plutocracy. Proof is that plutocracy has flourished despite repeated change agents, promises of reform and partisan shifts.

The tools of real rebellion are weak. Activists and dissidents look back and see successful rebellions and revolutions and think that when today's victims of tyranny experience enough pain and see enough political stink they too will revolt. This is wrong. They think that the Internet spreads information and inspiration to the masses, motivating them to revolt. This is wrong. They await catastrophic economic or environmental collapse to spur rebellion. This too is wrong.

 
Comments 1 - 3 of 3  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Dear mr. Hirschhorn, Also trying to understand how democracy does not work, I'd like to ask you a few questions: - Living in a small country (which is on the verge of merging into a greater Union) I was wondering if there is a correlation between the size of a democracy (nation) and the level of plutocracy? (The idea being: the more power absolute, the more power corrupts absolutely.) - What do you mean by restoring the power to the people? Can you give me one historical precedent of the people having the power, please? - You did not mention him in this article but I guess you are probably aware of mister Edward L. Bernays, Freud's nephew, father of spin, inventor of consumerism? Regards, Maarten

Posted on 05/21/2008 at 7:05:36 AM

Good article. I agree with all but one thing. Since civil disobedience is the goal, rather than recommend people NOT vote, recommend that they vote out ALL incumbents, and continue to do it until the politicians get it. After all, obviously, repeatedly rewarding incumbent politicians with 93%-to-99% re-eleciton rates is NOT working. In fact, it is stupid.

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 1:02:50 PM

This is the article quality I expect to see from you Joel and you didn't bash Ron Paul distastefully. I think people can appreciate that. They're just as lost and in need of good leadership. I don't think Ron Paul is the best solution to our problems. But out of all the candidates in the past 20 years, he's the only one that's been in the spotlight. But could that be attributed to new technologies such as, google, youtube, and wikipedia? I hope an Article 5 movement would catch fire one day as did the Ron Paul Campaign and perhaps "change" could then happen. Thanks for the great read.

Posted on 02/01/2008 at 12:02:36 PM

Comments 1 - 3 of 3