Analysis: The Importance of Super Delegates at the 2008 Democratic National Convention

There will be 4,049 delegates attending the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado, which means that either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama will need 2,025 delegates to win the nomination. Of
Analysis: The Importance of Super Delegates at the 2008 Democratic National Convention
 the total, 796 are super delegates, delegates to the Democratic convention that have a right to vote for the prospective nominee on the basis of their public position. Super delegates include elected officials such as U.S. Representatives, Senators and state governors, and party leaders such as members of the Democratic National Committee and the chairs of the state parties.

Super delegates were created by the Democratic Party in 1980, and were intended to attend subsequent conventions. The genesis of the creation of super delegates was a desire to dampen down the democracy that was infused in the Democratic Party as a result of the bruising 1968 political convention in Chicago, Illinois. At that convention, Vice President Hubert Humphrey was handed the presidential nomination by Party regulars such as Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, ignoring Senator Eugene McCarthy, who -- along with the slain Senator Robert F. Kennedy -- had battled it out during the primary season.

If Kennedy had lived, he likely would have been the Democratic nominee in 1968 tasked with taking on Richard Nixon, the Republican Party pick for president. As it was, the Kennedy forces at the convention refused to give their support to Eugene McCarthy, who had knocked President Lyndon Baines Johnson out of the race for the Democratic nomination by opposing the Vietnam War . McCarthy, who had won primaries such as Pennsylvania by huge margins, was given only a handful of delegates by the state party bosses at the '68 convention, most of whom went with Humphrey, the "Happy Warrior," a party stalwart.

Related information
  • There will be 796 superdelegates attending the 2008 Democratic National Convention in Denver
  • With 4,049 total delegates, a minimum of 2,025 delegates are required to win the nomination
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 10  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

Great article, its great how much work you put into this. We'll soon see who wins the nomination.

Posted on 03/10/2008 at 11:03:21 AM

Is there approximately 75 spots for super delegates that have not been choosen yet. If so, what are there qualifications, who picks them, and when will the be choosen.

Posted on 03/05/2008 at 9:03:20 AM

How do the 75 suger delegates get picked who are not yet known

Posted on 03/05/2008 at 9:03:14 AM

No, the Republicans have not added a Super Delegate concept.

Posted on 02/19/2008 at 2:02:00 PM

Do Republicans have Supers too as part of thier process?

Posted on 02/12/2008 at 11:02:04 PM

I wanted to add that I appreciate you did some work in writing this piece.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 6:02:20 AM

Super-delegates is a concept which probably could not withstand a constitutional test. It places a tremendous burden on candidates who must now campaign on two fronts. Who knows what 's going on with the super-delegate campaign? It engenders another tangled web of political favoritism. Isn't it the American democratic ideal that each poor slob voter has as much power as elites?

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 6:02:50 AM

...all the momentum that has been gained in these campaigns, the change movement, will be depleted the instant that super delegates cause an upset victory (that is one that is opposed to the seated delegate count). If they go against the majority seated delegates, then some or a lot of the people who voted for that majority might decide not to vote in the fall. I mean, talk about feeling as if your vote doesn't count! I'm an Obama supporter, but even if I were for Clinton, I would not want to see my seated delegate majority disenfranchised by a bunch of politicians. If people feel betrayed by their own party, they won't vote in November and the Dem's will not win. Whether Hillary or Barack wins the nomination... fixing this issue of superdelegates is critical to ensure trust in our party. I sincerely hope this issue is brought to the forefront of the DNC agenda immediately in order to avoid loss of trust in our party and ultimately a loss in November.

Posted on 02/07/2008 at 1:02:42 PM

...contributions, votes, and everything else that affects American people online in order to keep politicians honest and restore the public's trust in their government... wouldn't that type of change cut into the self interest (cash flow) of some of these superdelegates? So how can we trust Washington to vote to change itself? Lets think of them as regular people for a minute... imagine that you have a job that pays you $50k a year, but you earn $300k a year in commission, then imagine your boss is retiring and you have the opportunity to choose between 2 candidates, which one you want for a boss. You know that with one candidate he will most likely continue his $300k year commission and he also knows the other candidate's agenda will most likely force him into giving up his commission salary. Which one will he choose as his new boss? If that choice is obvious, then the choice to remove super delegates is also obvious. Washington has lost the trust of the American people, all

Posted on 02/07/2008 at 1:02:59 PM

At a time when people have lost trust in Washington and are voting to change it, how can the DNC even allow Superdelegates to participate? This is a matter of principle. The driving theme of this political movement we've been seeing is that we need to change Washington. Its looking more and more everyday like ultimately, the Democratic primaries will be left up to the Superdelegates (Washington) who will get to decide which candidate is going to "change" Washington. Are you with me... 1 seated delegate equals thousands of votes, 1 super delegate equals 1 person's interest... there's something shady about that. Maybe they've got the voters interest in their hearts, maybe they don't. We don't know... here's what we do know though. Don't some of these Democratic superdelegates take money from lobbyists and other special interest? Yes they do. And with the type of change Obama is talking about with plans to make the government more transperant by posting contributions, votes, and ev

Posted on 02/07/2008 at 1:02:42 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 10