U.S. Presidents and Their Influences on the Nation

Exploring the Theories of Friedenberg, Skowrenek, Friendenberg Regarding Presidential Regimes

By Corey Sipe, published Sep 12, 2006
Published Content: 741  Total Views: 360,829  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 2.8 of 5
Two scholars have competing theories to the Office of the Presidency. Friedenberg in his book “Sold to the Highest Bidder” argues that money plays a large role in the presidency and that democracy is undermined as a result. Skowronek in “Presidential Leadership in Political Time” argues that most presidents fit into one or three categories which all fit into a changing cycle of the Office of the Presidency. 

Private interests contribute money to both political parties to gain influence in formulating policies. These political parties look for the best person who can be sold to the public. Selling a candidate to the public can be done through buying of media time. Usually candidates have a lot of money to spend on campaign advertising to elicit public support for their campaign. Campaign advertising, not issues, is what ultimately elects candidates as President (Friedenberg, 2002). 

President John F. Kennedy and President Jimmy Carter came from two different financial backgrounds but had access to money, which ultimately bought them the election. These two presidents are examples of most past presidents who have had family members serve in public office and these family members enabled them to aspire to become President of the United States (Friendenberg, 2002). 

John F. Kennedy’s father, Joe Kennedy, came from a political background and had about $300 million in the 1960s. Joe used this money and popularity to finance his son’s campaign for the U.S. House in 1946. In 1952, John Kennedy beat Republican incumbent Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. in the U.S. Senate through a political campaign consisting of 286 workers, all hired by Joe (Friedenberg, 2002). 

Takeaways
  • Private interests contribute money to political parties to gain influence in formulating policies
  • Presidents can create a new regime, manage an established regime or strengthen a weakened regime
  • John Kennedy felt that avoiding conflicts is best done by refraining from doing divisive actions
Did You Know?
President Jimmy Carter and President Franklin Pierce can be credited with establishing a credible leadership in a weakened regime. Both presidents legitimacy were questioned at a time when their political parties had broken into many schisms. As members of the old order, they had to persuade the nation that they were committed to developing a new order by showing them that they understood and had a plan concerning the most basic problems facing the nation.
Resources
  • Friedenberg, Daniel M. Sold To The Highest Bidder: The Presidency from Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. (2002). New York: Prometheus Books. ; Quirk, Paul J. “Chapter 6: Presidential Competence”. In Nelson, Michael (Ed.) The Presidency and the Political System. (2003). Seventh Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press. ; Skowronek, Stephen. “Chapter 5: Presidential Leadership in Political Time”. In Nelson, Michael (Ed.) The Presidency and the Political System. (2003). Seventh Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On