Find » Arts & Entertainment » How the Internet Has Affected the W...

How the Internet Has Affected the Writing Community

By Rebecca Livermore, published Feb 09, 2008
Published Content: 175  Total Views: 129,463  Favorited By: 130 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.7 of 5
As is true with most things, the Internet has impacted the writing community in both good and bad ways. Let's take a look at both the good and the bad that has come about through the explosion of online publishing.

Pros of Online Publishing

1. The Internet creates a level playing field for writers. Although titles and degrees may help land certain writing gigs, most writers, even without credentials, can publish their work online. This gives all writers a chance to be heard.

2. Writing is immediately or very quickly published. No longer does a writer have to wait months or even years for their work to be published. Online publishing provides immediate gratification.

3. The Internet provides a good amount of exposure for new and experienced writers alike. Having work published anywhere, including online, may lead to more work, speaking engagements, and so on down the road.

4. Even beginning writers have an opportunity to be paid for their work. While the pay scale may be lower than it is in print magazines, it is a start, and a dream come true for many writers. Many sites provide ongoing pay, based on page views, for work submitted. Over time, this can result in a steady stream of income, even if a writer takes some time off from writing.

5. There are seemingly an unlimited number of places where work can be published online. This provides hardworking writers with the opportunity to publish a much higher volume of work.

6. Many online sites provide not only a place for writers to publish their work, they also provide a great deal of community. Internet writing has given many writers a social outlet with other like-minded people. Rather than feeling alone, many writers feel connected as a result of online publishing.

Cons of Online Publishing

1. Many people think they can write, but really can't. In spite of their lack of writing ability, they may find it easy to be published on the Internet. This leads to a lot of poor quality writing on the Internet that would never end up in a printed magazine. The poor quality writing of others impacts even good writers, who may not want their work on sites where much of the writing is subpar.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 43
Next >>
 
Wow, this is so true!

Posted on 02/27/2008 at 5:02:19 PM

 
Thanks for sharing the pro and con perspectives.

Posted on 02/24/2008 at 7:02:38 PM

 
The pros and cons listed by you ring very true. The internet has empowered people in more than one way. This democratisation of the media also leads to dumbing down, and a tabloid culture emerges, whose visiblity is generally more than the great good stuff, which is also on the Net. Please see my piece: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/566063/confessions_of_a_newspaper_reader.html , about my debut as a CJ. Thanks for sharing a very clear view.

Posted on 02/23/2008 at 6:02:27 AM

 
Great article.

Posted on 02/19/2008 at 5:02:31 AM

 
I have a background in medicine and english and hopefully articles stand up to my credentials. I do agree with everything you have said!

Posted on 02/14/2008 at 12:02:16 PM

 
A very well researched and well written piece. Very informative to the writing community.

Posted on 02/14/2008 at 6:02:45 AM

 
Very true; especially the ones about keyword density and the quality of writing. I don't know, I still think I'm a pretty good writer and have taken advantage of interesting topics at my disposal, but look at my PV's and a different story is revealed. It sort of bums me out, but maybe it's just my keyword density that's the culprit. I WISH I could go back and edit my earlier articles with better keywords.

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 4:02:36 PM

 
This is indeed great advice. I love how the net (for both writing and music) really takes the power away from the former Keepers of the Gate, but am also chagrined that any ol' pap gets exposure. Fear not, though, because with no "experts" to ignore talent while promoting mediocre work, at least on the Web, TALENT WILL ALWAYS SELECT ITSELF!

Posted on 02/12/2008 at 2:02:30 PM

 
I agree with the keyword aspect. I do not even consider them when I write because it feels inhibitive to me. You are right about the instant gratification of being published right away online. I can honestly say that if it were not for online publishing, I probably would have nothing published. Great article as always.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 10:02:11 PM

 
I get paid to do researched articles for another site. I have to laugh at some of the work that is incorrect, then gets copied and duplicated several times. It is really obvious, plagerism runs wild and wrong.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 11:02:33 AM

 
Excellent, balanced viewpoint. Thanks.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 8:02:44 AM

 
Great article. I have been writing for AC and others for about a year now, and find it rewarding to see my work in print. If it were only more financially rewarding....I need to look into writing for print media, too, I guess.

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 6:02:25 AM

 
Excellent analysis of the pros & cons!

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 6:02:28 AM

 
Very interesting article, and I agree with the pros and cons. I finally gave in lately, and started trying to incorporate keyword density, and I hate having to go back and repeat words over and over. We were always taught before NOT to repeat words, so it is difficult to do, but necessary if we are going to be read. Great topic!

Posted on 02/11/2008 at 5:02:47 AM

 
A wonderful research work on the subject. I fully agree with it. Keep going. Thank you again for the valuable information.

Posted on 02/10/2008 at 7:02:35 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 43
Next >>
Most Commented On