The Beauty of Matte Paintings in Film History and the Legacy of Peter Ellenshaw

Ellenshaw's Family Keeps His Ethereal Matte Art Alive

By Gregoriancant, published Feb 14, 2008
Published Content: 340  Total Views: 128,579  Favorited By: 30 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
Simply put (through my opinion), Peter Ellenshaw WAS the heart and soul of matte paintings used in movies from the 1940's-1990's. If you've never seen the work of this amazing (and, unfortunately late as of one year of this article at the age of 93) matte painter and all-around fine-art master--you apparently haven't watched many Disney films. The thing is, you have seen his work many times over, but probably assumed that all that ethereal-looking scenery in the backgrounds of many live-action Disney films was real. That patented "look" of Disney scenery was the artistic style of the U.K.'s own Peter Ellenshaw. His impressionistic mattes gave the true magical essence people subconsciously still ascribe to a film produced by Walt Disney. It's no wonder then that Ellenshaw and Disney became close friends after Walt hired him to create mattes on his first live-action film in 1950: "Treasure Island" and then full-time starting with the still-stunning "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" in 1954.

It's probably a fair assessment to say that Ellenshaw is the first person people think of now when thinking of the old handmade matte paintings used to create surroundings in movies that couldn't be produced otherwise in an age long before CGI. There were already artists creating matte paintings effectively before Ellenshaw became so renowned in the field during the 1940's. In case you're not familiar with how matte paintings worked in a pre-CGI world--it was basically a detailed painting on glass used to fill in a scene with an interior of a room or an outdoor scene. This painting on glass would then be composited into the existing scene to give the illusion the film had a higher budget creating elaborate set designs or filming at out-of-this-world locations.

Resources
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Great article - Ellenshaw's work really is peerless & I loved that you mentioned Buena Vista Visuals. People forget they were the preeminent FX studio in Hollywood and ILM owes them a great debt - also to Ray Harryhausen who developed the traveling matte which cut costs and gave more flexibility. CGI is a great tool giving films wonderful advances, however there's a purity in the artistry of a matte that can still take a viewer's breath away. More and more CGI is taking away real props and practical FX -what's the harm? For me, a film is about capturing live action - CGI is calculated drawing - it can be polished over and over. CGI should be used a a great tool - but if it's used in place of all other forms of FX/filming - the filming becomes more animation than anything. They can overlap, but should never overtake the other.

Posted on 02/17/2008 at 1:02:42 PM

 
Great article - Ellenshaw's work is really peerless & I loved you mentioning Buena Vista Visuals. People forget for years Disney was the preeminent special FX studio in Hollywood & ILM owes a great debt to not only them but to Ray Harryhausen - who helped develop a traveling matte - cutting costs & giving more flexibility to mattes. CGI is an incredible visual tool providing great advancements, however the pure artistry of a matte still can take a viewer's breath away. Also there's an important element of filming VS animation. Tho a matte is a drawing - it's not a continuous "artifice" in terms of movement & other things. It's there to achieve a look & establish a location. It's almost like another prop or character. With CGI animation/drawing is essentially taking over all aspects of visuals - the props and "practical" FX are almost secondary now. What's the harm? For me a film is about capturing "live action" - CGI & animation is drawing it & so the two can overlap, but not

Posted on 02/17/2008 at 1:02:00 PM

 
Matte work is vastly underrated today. In oh so many cases it would be preferable to CGI,, perhaps because it has a soul to it in the sense of a three-dimensionality aspect. Most people who are blown away by CGI effects would have their heads explode if they saw how much of what they thought was real in older movies were done through mattes.

Posted on 02/17/2008 at 4:02:39 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On