Building a Better Aircraft

Scientists Look to Birds and Bats for Aerodynamic Hints

By Gary Picariello, published Feb 12, 2008
Published Content: 699  Total Views: 1,143,576  Favorited By: 100 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.8 of 5
That Renaissance mastermind -- Leonardo Di Vinci -- apparently was onto something when he set about trying to design an airplane. Take a look at reproductions of Di Vinci's drawings and diagrams and you'll notice that his idea of manned flight was actually "winged flight". 'Ol Leonardo understood that "flapping" is really where it's at when it comes to manned flight and aerodynamics. Unfortunately, Leo could never overcome the problem of weight differential, meaning that a human could never flap the wings of his contraption fast enough to get off the ground, much less maneuver in the sky.

Fortunately for us -- several hundred years later -- aerodynamic engineers are finally realizing that Di Vinci's theories about flight are pretty well-grounded (pardon the pun). Namely, that "natural flyers" like birds, bats and insects outperform man-made aircraft in aerobatics and efficiency. In fact, according to a 9 Feb 2008 article on ScienceDaily.com, a team of University of Michiganengineers are studying these animals as a step toward designing flapping-wing airplanes -- although with wingspans smaller than a deck of playing cards.

It's really just a matter of common physics. Consider this: a Blackbird jet flying nearly 2,000 miles per hour covers 32 body lengths per second. But a common pigeon flying at 50 miles per hour covers 75. The roll rate of the aerobatic A-4 Skyhawk plane is about 720 degrees per second. The roll rate of a barn swallow exceeds 5,000 degrees per second. Or how about this: select military aircraft can withstand gravitational forces of 8-10 G. Many birds routinely experience positive G-forces greater than 10 G and up to 14 G.

Wei Shyy -- who chairs the UMich Aerospace Engineering Department and is the author of the new book "The Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers." Feels that, "...Natural flyers obviously have some highly varied mechanical properties that we really have not incorporated in engineering..."

Building a Better Aircraft
Building a Better Aircraft

A humming bird demonstates ideal wing movement. The question is -- how to replicate that on a large scale?

Credit: Steve Byland

Copyright: Steve Byland

Takeaways
  • Birds and Bats are aerodynamically superior to modern aircraft.
  • If engineers can copy "flapping" they'll produce aircraft that manuever better.
  • Flapping aircraft may not be as fast as conventional airplanes.
Did You Know?
The big problem is still WEIGHT: the flapping effect only works with tiny wing spans.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I'm not too sure whether I like the whole micro air vehicle concept. I'm probably paranoid (just hope 'HE' is not reading this) but this could be the perfect carrier for microscopicly small camera's or whatever device men can come up with that would be interesting enough to fly. I just hope they start digging in Leonardo's other so-called outrageous ideas. They might have been at the time, but I believe somebody once sang that the times are changing.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 10:02:35 PM

 
Fascinating- but a wingspan the size of a deck of cards? That's hard to imagine on something the size of a passenger jet.

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 8:02:45 AM

 
Great article, love the photo!

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 8:02:42 AM

 
Wouldn't it be freaky to look out at the wings and see them moving!? Whenever I dream of flying, though, my arms do move! Guess I gotta lose some weight before THAT becomes a reality. ;-) Very interesting reading, Gary! Kim

Posted on 02/13/2008 at 4:02:55 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On