The Immorality of Homosexual Sex

A College Student Plays the Devil's Advocate

By Ruby Kavitsky, published Feb 18, 2008
Published Content: 22  Total Views: 6,487  Favorited By: 1 CPs
Rating: 2.4 of 5
The Immorality of Homosexual Sex

In October, 2007, Illinois Senator and Presidential candidate Barack Obama added singer Donnie McClurkin to the cast of a gospel concert that his campaign was hosting. McClurkin, a self-professed "former gay," has been a vocal opponent of gay rights over the past several years. He has publicly stated that homosexual sex is unnatural, and that acting on homosexual desires is entirely based on choice. When Obama realized the controversy he had created by adding McClurkin to the bill, he asserted that the purpose of choosing McClurkin was to show the importance of bringing people together, even if they disagree.

However, this didn't work as well as Obama may have hoped. Many of Obama's supporters are African Americans living in the southern states, individuals who are statistically more likely to oppose granting more rights to homosexuals because of strong religious ties. According to Washington Post-ABC News national surveys this year, only 22 percent of black Democrats support gay marriage, compared to 43 percent of white Democrats. Around half of all black Americans, 52 percent, don't support civil unions or gay marriage for gay couples, compared to only 26 percent of whites.1 Obama supporters who are against homosexual sex and marriage feel that Obama, rather than ignoring the issue of homosexuality, should publicly condemn it as immoral. In opposition to individuals who feel that politicians who speak on the issue of homosexuality are overstepping their bounds, some feel that it is the role of a nation's leaders to speak out on moral issues.

Political leaders should not be silent on the unethical nature of homosexual sex in exchange for opposite-minded constituents. Instead, leaders ought to voice their opinions on this topic and stick to them. I, as a voter, want to know which candidates plan to champion homosexual causes and which endeavor to denounce homosexual sex acts as unethical and thus preserve the sanctity of heterosexual (true) marriage. I want to know where candidates stand because I believe that homosexual sex is a practice that is contrary to natural law.

Takeaways
  • Barack Obama recruits anti-gay gospel singer Donnie McClurkin to perform for him
  • Kantain ethical argument against homosexual sex
  • Why homosexual sex is immoral
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
I'm glad to know that this was an assignment. Having to argue something with little information or something you don't quite agree with is an excellent way to improve argument skills. Thank you for sharing the reasons behind this essay. And thank you for your comments on my article Borne to Be Gay.

Posted on 03/11/2008 at 7:03:31 PM

 
(continuation) ...where experimenters wanted to achieve a certain result. To those of you who've said that my arguments in this paper are fallacious, all I can really say in response is that I agree with you, but I tried to do the best I could with the "information" (can I really even call it that?) that is available in support of this argument. Thanks again for your input.

Posted on 03/11/2008 at 4:03:44 PM

 
Thanks for your comments, everyone. I wrote this paper for an Ethics class I was taking back in October 07 and we were assigned specific arguments that we had to make on particular issues as an exercise meant to teach us how to argue things regardless of our personal opinion. Obviously, I was given the assignment to argue that homosexual sex is immoral. Prior to writing this paper, I never really had a definite opinion on the issue. I was raised in a household where gay people were considered abnormal (no, not a Catholic one) so I guess I kind of subscribed to that view as well. Mostly I didn't feel like the issue applied to me because I'm straight and I don't personally know anyone who is openly gay. In the process of writing this paper, however, I began to realize that I did have an opinion, and (unfortunately for me) it was in disagreement with what I had been assigned to argue. I realized that the statistics available "against homosexuality" were the result of tiny studies

Posted on 03/11/2008 at 4:03:35 PM

 
I have to agree with Opher. "Your arguments are fallacious." You have applied meaning to biblical passages with the assumption that you understand the Christian God's plan. Chrisitians need to admit they don't know God's plan; to do so you would have to admit the possibility God (who created man in his image) created homosexuals as part of that plan. (A plan beyond human understanding). Your reference to Genesis 19, using Sodom as an adage against homosexuality is missing the point of the story which can be interpreted as against rape, not homosexuality, considering Lot wants to give his virgin daughters over to the town's men instead of the two angels. The angels saved Lot from rape by pulling him into the house, then plighted the town's men with blindness. If you read the whole passage it ends with Lot's daughters getting him drunk, then having sex with their father to get pregnant (another form of rape). You've neglected to recognize heterosexual rape is just as bad as homosexual r

Posted on 03/02/2008 at 3:03:05 PM

 
Scalia is not a thug. And I love Bible thumpers. They are better than stupid people who think human beings just popped up out of nowhere from nothing. And yes, gay and lesbian courtships are immoral and wrong...as I have stated before.

Posted on 03/02/2008 at 1:03:47 PM

 
That a thug like Scalia would be quoted in a bible-thumping rant about something that shouldn't bother any thinking person isn't surprising. What is immoral and deviant is the lengths "people of God" will go to in order to excuse their own hatreds and prejudices.

Posted on 02/21/2008 at 9:02:41 PM

 
About your 'assessment' that homosexual sex leads to mental problems -- why didn't you consider that the mental problems (anxiety, most likely) is more so due to the discrimination homosexuals are confronted with, the hate, and people like marquis who says they should be killed? have you thought about the societal abuse that leads to psychological angst? hmmm????

Posted on 02/21/2008 at 11:02:27 AM

 
Marquis Canaday=Fascist of the Year... But SERIOUSLY Marquis, what you just wrote sounds very much like what Hitler would say. By the way, why would you want to kill pacifists?

Posted on 02/20/2008 at 5:02:16 AM

 
I am for the fair treatment of everyone no matter what their sexual preference. It is America and they can do whatever.However, I dont like when homosexuals try to force their beliefs on everyone. It is like we have to accept the behavior.You cant make someone except homosexuality no more than you can make someone accept Christianity.

Posted on 02/18/2008 at 11:02:20 PM

 
Your arguments are fallacious. For example, in your argument based on Kant, depending on how you formulate the maxim, you could arrive at an opposite conclusion. If you formulate the maxim that consenting adults should be allowed the freedom to act as they choose as long as they do not hurt others, any consensual sex, including gay, becomes ethical. Second, your assertion based on Genesis does not follow from the text you quote. God does not say not to have non-reproductive sex, merely to have reproductive sex. One could easily make a case that both are acceptable, but that one is encouraged. Where you say "sex is meant to be shared only by married individuals" you are assuming something not proven. Further, that could be used as justification for allowing homosexual marriage - to preserve the sharing of sex only within marriage (if for the sake of argument we accept your unproven assumption). I could go on but it is clear that you started from a belief based on your religion and upbr

Posted on 02/18/2008 at 11:02:52 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Most Commented On