Models Shunned in the Name of Self Esteem

Waifs Beware - Anorexia Isn't Glamorous Anymore

If you thumb through a copy of any popular fashion magazine and look at the print ads, you will notice a recurring theme – the models are waifs. For decades the fashion industry has been dominated by rail-thin models like Twiggy and
 Kate Moss. Two words come to mind when I see bikini clad models in summer editions of magazines I subscribe to: binge and purge.

The constant argument that fashion models, and even Barbie dolls, are sending the wrong message to young girls is as old as I am. While Mattel was finally forced to change Barbie’s bust line to a more “realistic” size proportionate to her frame, (they overlooked the fact that Barbie – if she were real – would be about six feet tall and weigh 100 pounds) the fashion industry seemed to pick and choose models with less and less body mass with each photo shoot.

As I mentioned in a past article, Dove stirred up the masses with their “Beautiful” campaign for self esteem that featured women of average weight and height posing in print ads and billboards. The outrage displayed was almost comical.

TLC (The Learning Channel) soon jumped on the bandwagon with their show Cover Shot, hosted by leggy supermodel Frederique. The show’s goal: to make over an average woman and turn her into a cover model in 48 hours. At the end of the show she is revealed in all her newfound glamour on a billboard. The show both boosts the chosen woman’s self esteem and shows her even though she is “average” she can still be viewed as sexy and glamorous.

In the wake of changes with television ads, and doll figures came the biggest blow to the world of anorexic models everywhere – there is such a thing as being too thin. The Spanish runway fashion show Pasarela Cibeles, hosted in Madrid, turned away what they called “slews” of models - because they were too thin.

Related information
  • For decades the fashion industry has been dominated by rail-thin models like Twiggy and Kate Moss.
  • The biggest blow to the world of anorexic models everywhere: there is such a thing as being too thi
  • The Madrid government put pressure on the show to hire fuller figured models to serve as role models
 
Comments 1 - 9 of 9  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

If I hear one more time Kate Moss being referred to as "waif," rail thin, emaciated, super thin, etc., I will huff and puff and blow a house down. I even wrote an article about Kate Moss being the poster child for rail thinness. She is NOT, and NEVER WAS, rail thin. If you put Kate Moss next to Calista Flockhart, who's the rail-thin one? There is no comparison. I have seen plenty of models thinner than Kate Moss. Kate Moss does not, and never did, have the thinness of an Olympic marathon runner. Ever see those distance runners? Now THAT'S thin and waify. The actress who played Kimmie on "Full House" is another true waif. Kate Moss has 20 pounds on her easily. I've seen plenty of Kate Moss in the media. Her arms are nowhere near the thinnest out there. Neither are her legs. People see a model on a bill board who's half naked and has A-cup breasts, and automatically see her as a waif.

Posted on 11/29/2008 at 6:11:37 PM

Great article! I'd love to see fewer stick thin women in the fashion industry. :-)

Posted on 12/13/2006 at 9:12:00 AM

Great article! Bravo!!

Posted on 09/24/2006 at 4:09:00 PM

Big thank you's to all four of you that commented. My intention was not to say being thin was hurtful - it's the way models keep thin to keep their jobs that worries me. While I did not include data about models using drugs and developing eating disorders, because it wasn't the focus of my article, however there is loads of information on "tricks" models use to maintain skeletal figures for the sake of their jobs. Our daughters read about this stuff and think hey if _____ model is doing it so can I because she's perfect. Not all of it is legal or sensible dieting. Anyway, Sherri, Manda, and Kim all got what I was going for.

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 4:09:00 PM

Hi Katie, Your article is proportionately written. I don't think it bashes "all thin women" as Ms. Gilford suggests. What it said was that the fashion show turned away the models who didn't fit the bill.

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 11:09:00 AM

I think that Madrid has the right idea... it'll catch on. Frankly, I don't like having my kids think that you have to be some sickly drug addict to be in that industry. Defining the annorexic or junkie as sexy is just plain nasty. I agree with Sherri on the article and katie on the comment, 130lb for a nearly 6 ft tall woman is still a size 4 or 5 depending on where she carried her weight. Usually woman have a tendency to carry in the bust and butt... that would be a very refreshing figure as opposed to the strung out look.

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 11:09:00 AM

Given the height of preofessional runway models being at around 5"8" to 6'0" tall - 130 pounds is still quite thin. Thanks for commenting!

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 10:09:00 AM

Just because a person is below a BMI of 18 doesn't mean they have an eating disorder. Frankly, I don't want to see a full page spread of a 130 lb. woman in a bikini. You can be thin and fit.

Posted on 09/22/2006 at 7:09:00 AM

What a great article! I love your words of wisdom on page 2.

Posted on 09/21/2006 at 10:09:00 PM

Comments 1 - 9 of 9