Anonymous, Scientology, and the Story that the Media is Too Afraid to Tell

By Brett, published Feb 20, 2008
Published Content: 90  Total Views: 14,856  Favorited By: 15 CPs
Rating: 4.7 of 5
The last half of my title is not a phrase usually associated with serious writers. It is a phrase that automatically triggers thoughts of conspiracies, tall tales, and the ramblings of all-around lunatics. However, I have no need to make up my own little conspiracy, one is already in place, plain as day. I do not need to tell tall tales because the truth of the matter is more ridiculous than anything I could possibly produce. I do not need to visit an insane asylum because frankly, compared to the conspiracy that is finally being confronted surpasses even the most insane fantasies. Don't believe me? What if I told you the name of this conspiracy? Scientology...for those of you who are not familiar with the history of this cult, I would recommend googling Lisa McPherson, Operation Snow White, and Operation Freakout.

The challenge to Scientology arose sometime during early January, when an online group known as Anonymous declared war upon the Church of Scientology. Anonymous is a leaderless organization of people who meet on the internet and adhere to a code as long as they identify themselves as "Anonymous." In the past, Anonymous's activity has been mostly limited to internet pranks. Some "renegades" as one member referred to them, have issued threats and even carried out cyber-terrorism. When Anonymous first began its attacks on Scientology, it seemed as if the organization would stick to its code, which declares that "Anonymous is devoid of humanity." Most activity was centered around causing trouble for Scientology in any way possible.

As its first united attack against Scientology, Anonymous shut down several major Scientology websites. After several days, the websites came back online. So, did the Church of Scientology find some way to defend itself against these "cyber-terrorists", as the Church calls them? Actually, no, the Church of Scientology was (and still is) completely at the mercy of Anonymous. So why did they stop? One YouTube video from a member of Anonymous suggests that Anonymous stopped hacking Scientology as a direct result of the words of Mark Bunker.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 77
Next >>
 
That was directed to the user "Empty Vessel," sorry. =0) The article itself was VERY good. The news media is now big business that we cannot trust. I've been explaining to hubby about CoS & Anon & he stated that CoS is very "1984." Exactly!!! Anyone who has the facts will see Scientology for what it is =0)

Posted on 04/28/2008 at 1:04:47 PM

 
What has Scientology done that is evil??? Seriously?? Please take a few minutes to scroll through this. Factnet is a place for "Discussion, Resources and Support for Survivor Recovery from the Abusive Practices of Religions and Cults" Human rights abuses specifically: http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/favresc.htm Overview including stories of survivors who got out alive: http://www.factnet.org/Scientology/dianetics.html Other very important sites: http://www.whyaretheydead.net/ http://www.lermanet.com/faqs.html http://www.scientology-lies.com/ There are court records, judges statements, hushed up settlements in wrongful death statements if you refuse to believe anything else.

Posted on 04/28/2008 at 1:04:02 PM

 
Actually, Anonymous has no website that it is bound to. There are dark aspects of Anonymous, but this is not because they are "dedicated" to anything, but rather because many Anons are offensive for the fun of it. And as someone who went to two of the protests, I can certainly tell you that Anonymous is more than a bunch of "kids."

Posted on 04/21/2008 at 7:04:08 AM

 
You realize Anonymous is just a bunch of kids from 4hcan? And that 4chan is a site dedicated to stuff like hentai and child porn?

Posted on 04/18/2008 at 12:04:23 AM

 
Very interesting and well-written article. I've never understood why Scientologists are so defensive about their, uh, religion. Okay, that's only a half-truth. I think "organizations" like Anonymous just want to bring their egos down a notch. I personally think Scientology is based on LRH's common-sense view of life and how to treat others. He had a decent dose of self-intuitiveness. With that said, who the heck would bet their salvation on words written by a science fiction writer? (And this is coming from an atheist) I mean come one - Xenu and all of that far-fetched alien stuff made up by LRH? There's a line rational people should draw. Granted no one can say for sure how we all got here, or why we are here, but I don't think an alien made up by a writer is the answer. Of course, it only takes one person on a strong moral and power trip to devise a religion. Anyway, great story.

Posted on 04/14/2008 at 6:04:59 AM

 
So much fear... Why is it that when members of more established religions begin to fear others, they label the latter "cults". What exactly has Scientology done that is so insidiously evil? Anonymous has engaged in cyber-terrorism, loosely organized around central themes and principles; sounds a bit like al-Qaeda. The truth is Scinetology has never waged a war in the name of their prophets, where as Christianity and Islam (nand many other major world religions) have. There's one going on right now, isn't there? Perhaps if people more closely followed the tenets of their chosen religion, they would learn a thing called TOLERANCE (a very common theme in all religions before they are diluted by propaganda, inuendo, and misinterpretations). We do have a luxury by living in a free society and that is we are free to choose our religion and methods of worship. Anonymous is free as well to choose it's idealogy. That is another benefit of living in a free society. We can engage in open

Posted on 04/05/2008 at 7:04:50 AM

 
Excellent distillation of the story.

Posted on 04/03/2008 at 5:04:00 PM

 
I a vague notion of what scientology is and I would appreciate the media to cover this subject a bit more to raise awareness about this dangerous cult. How about less reality shows, more real news?

Posted on 03/24/2008 at 10:03:27 AM

 
same for www.petakillsanimals.com, no media coverage

Posted on 03/20/2008 at 1:03:52 PM

 
Operation reconnect 04/12/2008 Expect Us. Again. And Again. And Again.

Posted on 03/19/2008 at 8:03:53 PM

 
i remember when scientology 1st came to our small little hometown in CT. as a youngster i didn't understand know what it was and was scared to death to pass by the building.

Posted on 03/15/2008 at 8:03:47 PM

 
The next protests are on March 15th if anyone is interested in covering the protests or participating.

Posted on 03/10/2008 at 3:03:38 PM

 
I'm tempted to see most religions lose their tax exempt status since they insist on erasing the line between church and state. Scientology would be the first.

Posted on 03/09/2008 at 1:03:55 PM

 
Eric Baum's been very busy propagating lies about Anon.

Posted on 03/07/2008 at 9:03:38 PM

 
Terrific article, Brett. I've got nothing against freedom of speech/religion, but the Scientology cult is simply scary. I'd never heard of the group Anonymous, and want to thank you for the tip. The flaw in the media is their 3 step approach to the daily news. Seems as if it's always the same three stories, across the spectrum of channels. Personally, I think news like this MUST be covered! Makes you wonder if there IS some sort of pressure from the Scientologists to repress this type of thing. And so far as Tom Cruise, his endorsement and escapades related to Scientology REALLY ward me off from that group and their silly beliefs. Thanks for a well-argue and intelligent recap. I'm off to look at those You Tube vids... KIM

Posted on 02/29/2008 at 1:02:04 AM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 77
Next >>
Most Commented On