Examining Leadership Characteristics in 2008 Presidential Candidates
When we think about leaders, we generally tend to think about those who grace or occupy the world stage. Historically, Lincoln, Washington, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Churchill, Stalin and Nelson Mandela come to mind, but there are many. Some are political, some religious, some social, some in the world of sports and in the world of literature, music and art.
There are those who present themselves to the public to be chosen to lead. At present, we have, perhaps the world's best example of that process being acted out on the American stage. America is presented with choice of future President. Will it be Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barak Obhama or Mike Huckabee who will be the beneficiary of their preferences. It is an enormously onerous duty and responsibility they bear in making this choice because, of course, it effects not only the United States but it will also impact significantly on the rest of the world.
The "rest of the world", does not have a vote in the process. One might ask, if the person selected for the position of President of the United States, will be cast in the role of Leader of the Free World, then perhaps consideration ought to be given, at some future date, to allow those countries outside of the United States, who will, or maybe, affected by the result of the election, some way of exercising or expressing their preferences in the choice of President.
Of course, one can anticipate the contrary argument. Why should countries or persons outside the jurisdiction of the United States or any other sovereign state, have the right to exercise a vote in internal elections? In perhaps all other countries, the Prime Ministers or Presidents do not normally purport to have a right to dictate how other countries behave. Such has been the position with the U S, and I hastily add, often at the behest of countries in Europe and elsewhere. Many countries have, in time of war or economic crisis, requested or imposed on the US to come to the rescue.
There are those who present themselves to the public to be chosen to lead. At present, we have, perhaps the world's best example of that process being acted out on the American stage. America is presented with choice of future President. Will it be Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barak Obhama or Mike Huckabee who will be the beneficiary of their preferences. It is an enormously onerous duty and responsibility they bear in making this choice because, of course, it effects not only the United States but it will also impact significantly on the rest of the world.
The "rest of the world", does not have a vote in the process. One might ask, if the person selected for the position of President of the United States, will be cast in the role of Leader of the Free World, then perhaps consideration ought to be given, at some future date, to allow those countries outside of the United States, who will, or maybe, affected by the result of the election, some way of exercising or expressing their preferences in the choice of President.
Of course, one can anticipate the contrary argument. Why should countries or persons outside the jurisdiction of the United States or any other sovereign state, have the right to exercise a vote in internal elections? In perhaps all other countries, the Prime Ministers or Presidents do not normally purport to have a right to dictate how other countries behave. Such has been the position with the U S, and I hastily add, often at the behest of countries in Europe and elsewhere. Many countries have, in time of war or economic crisis, requested or imposed on the US to come to the rescue.
|
|