Delusional Hope: The Obama Rapture

By Joel Hirschhorn, published Feb 21, 2008
Published Content: 93  Total Views: 163,302  Favorited By: 20 CPs
Rating: 2.7 of 5
Never have so many hoped for so much because of rollicking rhetoric and pulsating platitudes. A tsunami of hope has plunged America into electoral euphoria. In its path is the wreckage of critical thinking about what ails the US and what bold, revolutionary actions are needed. Barry Obama has accomplished semantic alchemy, turning justified but grim distrust and outrage with government and politics into hallelujah hope. But most hope never materializes and is a terrible predictor of reality.

Think about the prevalence of hope: sports teams heading into a championship game, research scientists envisioning a Nobel Prize, people in the criminal justice system awaiting trial, entrepreneurs starting a new business, people starting off on a long-awaited vacation, American Idol contestants, college seniors dreaming of becoming superrich, and all those supporters of Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich, and other presidential candidates that will not reach the White House.

Hope produces far more losers than winners. Hope is enjoyable until failure hits. But most people do not give up on hope, just move on to the next hope.

Obama hoped that he could tap into the national desire for change from the awful conditions produced by the Bush administration by selling hope to voters rather than his experience and accomplishments. Like a political medicine-man he has succeeded as a compelling seller of hope, better than the best infomercial charlatan.

Like a self-fulfilling prophesy, his proof that hope works is his life story and political campaign. This resembles a con man selling a real estate scheme by showing pictures of his yacht, estate and Rolls Royce. Millions of consumers succumb because of their hope that riches can be obtained by following the quack's advice and formula. Such false hope succeeds because people buy into wrong or deceitful information. False hope can be revealed through objective examination of the facts, assumptions or promises used by the hope purveyor.

Delusional Hope: The Obama Rapture

When Barack was Barry Obama

Credit: open source

Copyright: open source

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
 
continued from below-- at least trying to unify people. It is not delusional to think giving Obama a shot at getting the ball rolling.

Posted on 02/23/2008 at 7:02:17 AM

 
I too have been frustrated by the whole voting for the lesser evil thing, and in fact, I was not an Obama fan until a couple of months ago when I started listening to him closely and looked into his past progressive credentials. If I had it my way, Dennis Kucinich would be the candidate. Anyway Joel, what do you propose people do if giving Obama a chance is so wrong and simply a lesser of two evils vote? Should we just write articles on AC and whine about how everyone sucks? I have determined that there is something special about the guy, and the reason I think he has a better chance than anyone to bring change is that he has the ability to inspire people, and inspired people start and join movements that force government to change. All significant progress throughout history has been brought about by the people, and Obama, unlike Hillary and most of the other major candidates, speaks in these terms--about empowering people and getting people interested and involved, and at least tryin

Posted on 02/23/2008 at 7:02:34 AM

 
The biggest thing to fear with an Obama presidency is that millions of hope-filled Americans will distort the reality of his presidency to justify their hopes, even though objectively he does not produce anything near the results that he and they had hoped for!!!!! Of course, Obama and his supporters will blame many others for failure to produce change and reform, but of course all such obstacles (e.g., special interests, lobbyists, Congress) are normal and inevitable obstacles -- which raises the issue NOW, of exactly HOW Obama will overcome sucn inevitable obstacles. A lot of what I hear in people annoyed with my views (though I write to stimulate thinking) is lesser-evil justification for choosing Obama over others. Lesser-evil voting is the reason our plutocracy keeps flourishing.

Posted on 02/23/2008 at 5:02:24 AM

 
Ever hear of Thomas online? Bill Clinton and Dubai? Recall Hillary's blowing the whistle on GWB due to Neil and his conflict of interest failing to mention her own with Bill? Best not give people false hope, might as well tell the truth and have them ask for that cup of corruptions Kool Aid now. The opposite of hope is hopeless suicidal depression you see. Just when someone convinced me that I could make my voice count in DC....should never have bothered to register to vote. I am delusional you see. Hello Iran, a return of the draft to bolster our lack of adequate troops, and look out if we pushed the last straw on the global camel's back~already cautioned by China (who we are heavily in debt to pay for Iraq) have cautioned us about invading Iran.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 6:02:48 PM

 
Robert De Niro, Grateful Dead members (yeah they may be delusional), the former Caroline Kennedy, Ethel Kennedy, Ted Kennedy, Toni Morrison (yeah the one who's offhand comment dubbed Bill the first black president and who never endorsed a candidate before ditto) Joan Baez, Governor Sebelius, Cornell West, all of Jimmy Carter's family members except one, all the newspaper editors of Texas's major newspapers, editors of the Los Angeles Times, Alice Walker, Maria Shriver (whose husband endorses McCain), Stevie Wonder, Charles the Republican Barkley and countless citizens and elected officials are drinking from the same Kool Aid cup. The delusional ones are those who are voting for an impeached ex president, known liar and womanizer to have a third term in office with a carbon copy "co-presidency" of the 1990s. If you love war, I am sure the Republicans will do you fine as will Clinton who voted yes on the Iran Resolution.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 6:02:03 PM

 
joel- you could not be further from reality in your assertions... when i was in training (medical) and we were trying to understand some concepts about statistics, we kept records on one month of nba basketball scores... the result from some of the statistical tests on these results showed that there was no statistical difference between the winning and losing scores which might lead one to conclude that it is meaningless to play the games at all... but in fact some team or the other always wins and i think in a similar way, you are discounting the fact that: -someone is going to win the nomination and election... -it really sucks right now, that is, there is nothing good about living now durng what will be w's pathetic legacy... -there is no 'proven' plan that works for what currently ails us; i doubt the problem could be easily described... -the modern world monarchic democracy that is suggested by hillary's candidacy (bush, clinton, bush, clinton) is something that was

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 1:02:20 PM

 
Another important point about Obama and his promise to unite political interests is that he has the most liberal voting record in the Senate; why in the world would people think that such an ultra-left politcian would really unite diverse political interests????

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 11:02:31 AM

 
I saw the headline of your article and immediately went Amen! So many otherwise intelligent and educated people are brainwashed by this guy. People treat him like the Messiah. You can't say anything bad about Obama without people accusing you of being cynical, racist, or traitor to your race. Obama DOES have a platform--he's a party-line liberal, but many people are voting for him not because of his platform, but because he makes them feel good. I'm not against hope--I love hope! I'm just not a fan of the "let government fix everything" mentality that some of his supporters buy into. By the way, I was a Romney supporter.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 11:02:33 AM

 
What should strike objective people as fascinating is the close resemblence between supporters of Ron Paul and Barack Obama; both groups have cult-like qualities. Here is wonderful article on Obama supporters: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/columnists/view.bg?articleid=1074977&format=&page=2&listingType=col

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 10:02:29 AM

 
It's quite ironic, Hirschhorn, that you ramble on with misguided analogies and nothing of substance, in an article that purports to say Obama is nothing but empty rhetoric. It so happens that many of Obama's supporters are among the most educated in the country. And if you actually did some research and investigation, rather than sit around coming up with drug metaphors and searching for photos of Obama with an afro, you might find that Barack offers more substance than any of the other candidates. If your hope is to persuade readers by telling them their support for a candidate is symptomatic of mental illness, then perhaps you are the one who is delusional.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 10:02:39 AM

 
So what Nichole. Who doesn't adopt ideas, or "messages" from some other source? You can say this of every single candidate that has participated in this race. What is so original or convincing about Hillary Clinton for instance? Not only that, I keep hearing about her being so much more qualified than Obama, an all about how she is competent and proven--yet I am having trouble seeing where any of these qualifications of proven effectiveness is. What has she done that is so impressive that we should write off Obama. Again, Obama is not proposing hope without action--he has said this many times. I love how all of a sudden--because of how much more effective Obama is--campaign speeches are supposed to be dull policy descriptions. Face it CLintonites and Obama cynics--he is the real deal and he far overshadows the geriatric, dull, hawkishness of McCain, and the business as usual, condescension of Hillary and Bill Clinton.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 8:02:05 AM

 
I absolutely love this piece! And you're right. Hope can inspire, but the key is transforming that hope into action. Obama loves to use hope phrases (legitimately and not so legitimately) from many inspiring sources. But does recycling the words of Kennedy and King qualify as substantive hope? It seems to me Obama is just very talented at taking other people's messages and platforms and calling them his own.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 8:02:56 AM

 
The one thing that Joel Hirschhorn is not is a Clinton plant.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 7:02:45 AM

 
One more thing Joel. It's not that I am 100% convinced that he can achieve what he says he can. But, I am willing to give him a shot, because I think he is genuine and seems to be the type that will be responsive to the people, while at the same time motivating masses of folks. What is the other option? More Clinton style, dead end politics? Obama also has a much more progressive history than what his time as a senator would indicate. That is why I am willing to give him a shot.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 6:02:59 AM

 
continued from below -- When you reduce the millions of folks who believe in his message to delusional, impotent hope junkies--you represent what he is trying to change.

Posted on 02/22/2008 at 6:02:40 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 17
Next >>
Most Commented On