Find » Arts & Entertainment » Movies » Movie Review: Be Kind Rewind

Movie Review: Be Kind Rewind

By MoviePulse.net, published Feb 26, 2008
Published Content: 327  Total Views: 14,741  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.9 of 5
Be Kind Rewind could work as a short film, but as a feature length comedy, it runs dry relatively quickly. A simple yet absurd idea fuels quality parody laughs, but the story attempts to have meaning - which it is unable to muster. Essentially a series of skits sewn together with incongruous drama, Be Kind Rewind bizarrely executes a plot that fuses reality and fantasy in the most unpalatable of manners. When every harebrained concept is wholly unrealistic and the conflict is depressingly real, the outcome is one that can't find resolution - least of all satisfactorily.

In Passaic, New York, Mike (Mos Def) is left in charge of a shoddy video rental store called "Be Kind Rewind," while owner Mr. Fletcher (Danny Glover) takes a vacation to investigate how to make his business boom. Being threatened by contractors who wish to level his dilapidated building, his only hope is to raise a huge sum of money to pay for the necessary repairs. When neighboring friend Jerry (Jack Black) accidentally becomes magnetized and erases all of the VHS tapes in the store, Mike must quickly think of a plan to replace them. Jerry suggests re-filming each movie using themselves as actors, and much to everyone's surprise, the customers actually like the home-made short films. Recruiting Alma (Melonie Diaz) and several of the townsfolk, (allowing them to become "stockholders of their own happiness") Mike and Jerry start raising money to save the nostalgic store, but soon events spiral out of their control when studio agents discover the copyright-infringing antics of the desperate duo.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
 
I still want to check this one out. It keeps getting mixed reviews from different people.

Posted on 03/07/2008 at 1:03:08 PM

 
Misinformed, perhaps, as the details of New York was a mistake, but certainly not cynical. Gondry is certainly not in a catagory all his own. Why should he be? Is he so unique and influential of a filmmaker that he defies comparison to others in his profession? Standing up for Gondry simply because he is Gondry is not a valid argument for why his film is good. When a director repeats his mistakes or latches onto his one singular idea to reuse incessantly, it is not a stroke of genius, but rather a lack of new ideas. It sounds like you choose not to criticize his work for what it is, but to praise him because his previous films have already proven him as something he's not.

Posted on 02/27/2008 at 11:02:59 PM

 
This review is horribly cynical and misinformed, making me wonder if the reviewer actually watched it, or just pouted through it. The points about absurd plot holes, visual eccentricities and bi-polar jumps between drama and comedy, may hold up for any other director, but Gondry is in a class all his own. These elements are too be expected, and criticizing Gondry for them is like ripping on Picasso for making distorted faces in his paintings. Also it is Mike, not Jerry that comes up with the idea to first film Ghostbusters as the solution, and Passaic is in New Jersey, not New York. Minor details perhaps, but things like this get missed when you are overlooking a film's merits for the sake of criticism.

Posted on 02/27/2008 at 10:02:53 PM

 
Thanks for the review. I wasn't quite sure to catch this one or not...

Posted on 02/27/2008 at 6:02:10 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 4 of 4
 
Most Commented On