Find » Politics » Obama's Healthcare Plan Versus Hila...

Obama's Healthcare Plan Versus Hilary's Healthcare Plan

The Big Debate

By David Patrick, published Feb 27, 2008
Published Content: 33  Total Views: 9,054  Favorited By: 6 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.0 of 5
If you have not been under a rock, thrown away your TV, not picked up a magazine, or have chopped your ears off-- chances are that you have heard about the debates going on between Barack Obama and Hilary Clinton on their run for the Democratic nomination for presidency. If you've been watching you would have noticed that many of their plans seems very similar, however, one particular issue that keeps causing dissension between the two are the health care plans of each. So I have given you the one stop shop to find out the differences.

The problem is that currently there are over 45 million Americans who do not have health care. Of that large number 9 million or more are children.

I will start with Senator Obama: (So that Hilary is not upset again for having to "go first" again as she expressed in the Ohio debate)

Obama's Healthcare Plan

1. Senator Obama has a vision for a universal healthcare plan where every American will be covered.
2. For the Americans that are already insured, there will be no change except in the cost of premiums which Obama says will be less.
3. There will be guaranteed eligibility meaning that no one will be turned away because of pre-existing conditions or illness
4. Obama says that his plan will have comprehensive benefits which means the plan should cover all essential medical services: preventative, maternity and mental (These are plans similar to that of those offered to members of Congress)

5. People who do not qualify for programs such as Medicaid but still are in need of financial assistance will get an income related federal subsidy in order to buy into the new public plan or purchase some private insurance

6. The plans should be easily portable. This means that those who are participating in the new public plan will be able to change employment or jobs and not put health care coverage in jeopardy.

7. For those employers who either don't offer a large contribution to the cost of health coverage for employees or don't offer at all will be required to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the cost of the national plan. Small employers meeting certain revenue criteria will not have to

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
Obama's plan does not mandate with government penalty. He has worked on behalf of vets to ensure they are taken care of for their service to our country. Hillary seems out of touch with the average citizen who, when they do not buy it is because they can not afford. I would not trust any government program~look at the mess they made of Social Security another mandated program.

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 8:02:27 PM

 
Health insurance is not health care. Hillary's plan is mandatory, because it needs young healthy people to buy it so it will cover older people or unhealthy people. Her plan will be enforced with government penalty of anyone that does not buy health insurance. She has not stated who her outside agency is that will administer her plan. Because she is 'in bed' with pharmaceutical lobbyists and her and Bill's past history of favortism in creating laws that benefit their friends, I am quite sure it will bring more $$$ back to them, such as Bill benefits by his involvement in Dubai and Dubai hires lobbyists that contribute to her campaign which makes everything she does suspect. Her plan discriminates against people of certain religions and people who prefer alternative forms of health care that is not covered by health insurance companies. She also does not address the issue of war vets being denied their earned health care benefits by the VA.

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 8:02:45 PM

 
The problem is more than just the uninsured. The root of the problem is, and always has been, that you can't put a for-profit entity (insurance company) in between the consumer and the provider and expect anything other than profit to be well-served. We need a National Health-Care Plan as outlined in House Bill HR-676, and we need to get the profit mongering insurance companies out of the business of making medical decisions that inflate their profits. Michigan Representative Conyers outlines how to pay for it here: http://www.house.gov/conyers/news_hr676_2.htm

Posted on 02/28/2008 at 1:02:30 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On