Defending the Right to Hate (Part 2)

By Greg Reeson, published Sep 24, 2006
Published Content: 203  Total Views: 52,124  Favorited By: 15 CPs
Rating: 4.8 of 5
Several months ago I wrote a column in which I defended the right of Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church to stage protests at the funeral sites of soldiers killed in the Global War on Terror. Despite many legal efforts to restrict these demonstrations, Phelps and his flock continue to rally at the graves of our war dead. And now the tiny Kansas church is getting help from the ACLU.

Phelps and his flock first gained national notoriety when they began showing up at military funerals waving signs that read “God Hates Fags” and “America is Doomed.” The basic sermon goes something like this: because America tolerates homosexuality, God is offended and is killing off the young men and women of our military as punishment for our sins.

Phelps preaches a radical, fire-and-brimstone message that twists scripture to suit his agenda. He viciously attacks the families of fallen soldiers and desecrates their memories when they are most vulnerable. And he makes no apologies for what he is doing.

In response to overwhelming public discontent for Phelps’ tactics, 29 states and the U.S. Congress passed laws designed to prevent people like Phelps from disrupting military funerals. This past Memorial Day, President Bush signed into law the Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act, prohibiting demonstrations within a certain distance of national cemeteries.

Private groups like the Patriot Guard Riders stage their own counter-protests to provide a buffer between Phelps and the soldiers’ families. These groups generally keep their demonstrations low-key and just try to shield the grieving loved ones from the hate-filled rhetoric of the Westboro Baptist Church. The Patriot Guard has received overwhelming support and its 50,000-plus members travel the country to match Phelps protest for protest.

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 16
Next >>
 
I, too, have served my country and defended the rights FOR ALL PEOPLE to live their lives as they see fit. Though it pains me to know that such blatant disrespect has been rubbed in the faces of those who had the balls to wear a military uniform and serve honorably, it is their right to agree or disagree with anyone they choose to. Even the KKK has a right to rally and spread their message of hate. However, a person needs to know the difference between expressing free speech and breaking the law. It is a sad day in this country when a law has to be created that keeps people like the WBC from disrespecting the memories of a fallen soldier and the right for that soldier's family to mourn in peace. You would think that a level of humanity, personal responsibility and moral conduct will be enough to stop a person from over stepping boundaries, especially in a religous setting. The ACLU was initially created to defend the rights of the "little guy" who would other wise go voiceless but m

Posted on 10/07/2006 at 2:10:00 PM

 
Stephanie, you don't need to defend your thoughts and beliefs; you're as much entitled to them as the "liberal extremists" and the "conservative extremists." I think that's what Capt Reeson is pointing out; we don't have the thought police in this country (yet). The ACLU represents one extreme and people like Jerry Fallwell represent the other extreme. They BOTH have a purpose in our society; we need the extremists as watch-dogs to make sure that, as a society, we don't lean too far in one direction. It's that "checks and balances" thing we all learned in social studies 101. I think that the truth lies somewhere in the middle of these extremes. ("What is truth? asked a Roman judge over 2000 years ago)If we lived in the Middle East, Capt Reeson would be minus his head tonight! I like it here in the US where I can be a fool or a wise person on MY terms.

Posted on 10/01/2006 at 8:10:00 PM

 
I do not believe in killing babies. I have spent my life defending those weaker than I am. And I do not protect murderers from the rightful justice they deserve for their crimes. Quite frankly, you don't know what you are talking about, and I'm proud of my life and the stances that I've taken and will continue to take in favor of the great moral values of our country and heritage.

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 6:09:00 PM

 
Forgot to say to Capt Reeson, you and I both know that a military member's job is to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States." ALL of it, not just the parts we agree with. Phelps and his ilk make me puke, but he has the absolute right to be a big-mouthed assh...Sir, you're not only defending the right to hate; you're defending the Constitution`just like I did. Respectfully, Major (ret) M. Kohut, USAF

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 4:09:00 PM

 
Some of y'all are more extreme than the extremists! The ACLU does not support NAMBLA, Reverend. S.L., "Muslims" are not the enemy. Ever met any American-born Muslims? I sure have, even in OUR armed forces. Muslim terrorists (extremeists) are the enemy, not Muslims. American Timothy McVeigh was our enemy when he blew up the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City in 1995. Anyone, regardless of gender, who thinks that women are only good to cook and "pop out bablies" would have me immediately executed. My husband is a better cook than me and I have no children. Somebody kill me, please!

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 4:09:00 PM

 
Ali, "restricting women to do nothing but cook and pop out babies," is still a Muslim value. RE: The recent bombing of schools in Afghanistan because they are teaching women.

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 12:09:00 PM

 
One might beg to question; if there was a demonstration against ACLU, would ACLU defend it? and ya manda, the reason you're allowed to vote is because of Liberal values. (or one might correctly say, lack of values) Yup, restricting women to do nothing but cook and pop out babies was once a good ol' christian conservative value.

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 11:09:00 AM

 
Excellent treaties, Greg. ACLU aside, it's good to see a member of our military that understands what he is really defending. We can't legislated decency and common curtsey.

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 11:09:00 AM

 
And Manda, conservatives already are a minority. Virtually everything many take for granted--clean water, clean air, safe foods, product labeling, the weekend (courtesy of the labor movement), your right to vote as a woman, the GI Bill, Social Security etc--were all fought for and won by LIBERALS. Conservatives like you are the ones who fought against almost all these things. This is a country based on LIBERAL values.

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 12:09:00 AM

 
If you robots would take a second to look at the ACLU's record, you would see that they have defended everyone from JERRY FALWELL to the WBC. But what use do you guys have for facts? My mistake

Posted on 09/30/2006 at 12:09:00 AM

 
If the ACLU has its way, soon Christians, conservatives and patriots will become the minorities. Does that mean they'll start defending us? Scary thought! Good thing there are more sane people in the world rather than the terrorists and people like these other commentors that defend them and their actions. I wonder if they feel good knowing that they embrace all that is evil and reject all that is good and decent.

Posted on 09/29/2006 at 9:09:00 PM

 
The ACLU is all for the freedoms we so cherish? Really? They are not in any way whatsoever in support of the troops who willingly go to fight the War on Terror, are they? How about those who want to celebrate religious holidays? No, again. How about the pre-born? How about innocents of every description who are forced to live with the freedoms that evil people exercise with full support of the ACLU? In a free country, some people seem a little freer than others. You have the right to swing your fist... until it comes in contact with someone else's nose, my friends. The ACLU wants the freedom to beat others to death in the name of their concept of freedom. They cost us far more than they give...

Posted on 09/29/2006 at 8:09:00 PM

 
Defending the constitution? Get real!!!! ACLU defends NAMBLA: North American Man Boy Love Association/ yes folks that means they support pedophiles...... They are AGAINST the Boy Scouts. They also support Nazi's marching through Jewish neighborhoods, but COMPLAIN about pro-life people exercising their freedom of speech at abortion clinics. Yeah, ACLU is great isn't it? It tries to take GOD out of our lives and poisons brainless idiots into thinking that it is a worthy cause. While retarded individuals fight to uphold its immoral behavior and evil tendencies. Stephanie Dray, You call this piece "hateful, disgraceful, and immoral" But you belive in killing babies, not defending those weaker than you, and protecting those that murder innocent people. I truly hope that you were standing in front of a mirror when said those things... that would be the only time those words would apply. You people are sad and miserable which is why we pray for you.

Posted on 09/29/2006 at 8:09:00 PM

 
Greg, here is another liberal agreeing with you...and the fact that the ACLU is defending them should silence some criticisms of that organinzation. That said, what the group is doing is a dispicable act. And thank you for reminding us that the truest test of freedom is what we allow those who dont' agree with us to do...

Posted on 09/25/2006 at 8:09:00 PM

 
You are, unfortunately, absolutely correct. This hateful, disgraceful, immoral expression is, nonetheless, protected speech. It is one of the poignant things about our country, that it protects even those who hate it or those who fight for it. However, I would not be surprised if a grieving family member lashed out in a violent way. I might have a hard time blaming them for doing so.

Posted on 09/25/2006 at 11:09:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 15 of 16
Next >>
Most Commented On