Find » Opinion/Editorial » Is it OK for African Americans to V...

Is it OK for African Americans to Vote for Obama Because He is Black?

By Jeff Musall, published Mar 02, 2008
Published Content: 335  Total Views: 208,358  Favorited By: 92 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.4 of 5
Barack Obama is drawing the vast majority of the black vote in America. Some seem to have a problem with that. I don't. Those who have played the "race card" seem to assert that African Americans are voting for Obama simply for that reason. They fail to take into account the fact that he is just a great candidate. He is drawing support from all corners, and the more people hear about him the more support he draws. The more people find out about John McCain, the more they become wary of the "Straight talk express." Obama is a candidate that reaches across all boundaries.

But the question remains, is it OK to vote for him just because he is black? Of course voters should educate themselves and vote for the candidate who most appeals to them regardless of race or gender. But this is America, after all, and we have some work to do in regard to race and gender. Some ask if America is ready for a black president. I think America is ready for a good president that happens to be African American. Sadly, I don't think many in America are ready for a woman president, no matter how qualified.

Still, there are voters who will choose (or not) to vote for Obama strictly on race. For blacks, who could blame them? There is a great candidate who also happens to share race. It's a win-win. If the race gets more people to consider him, all the better. Personally, I don't consider race at all, but I do consider religion. If a candidate who professed to be an Atheist was running, I would be hard pressed to not support him or her, as long as the positions were acceptable.

There are some who support Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. It is sad that the first woman with a real chance is running against the first African American with a real chance. Both would be good for the country when it comes to moving forward in regard to race and gender. Both are held to a higher standard because of race and gender now, and to see that change would be a good thing indeed.

Takeaways
  • Race and gender shouldn't be factors, but they are
  • Obama is a good candidate that happens to be African American
Comments
Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
 
So, on that not so short note...I do want to defend Christ though and I do believe that having someone who runs the Presidency should at the very least have the beliefs I share. This is the part I get confused with. Should there be a seperation of Church and state? Sometimes, I think there should be based on the fact that I as a Christian would rather have someone who was a Christian running our country, but what about those other people, people who don't believe in anything or those who believe in a different God? I don't believe that my God, a loving God, would want us to force our religion down the throats of those who don't believe or don't want to believe so I think that getting someone in the White House who believes in God (a higher power) but not necessarily sharing the views of everyone (because in the real world this isn't going to happen), would probably be best. I'm off subject a little with this one I know...sorry. McCain isn't looking good at all though.

Posted on 08/01/2008 at 8:08:44 AM

 
I get ya! In the end...I'll probably vote for Obama too...oneone is better than Bush! I just don't think we need to vote for someone based just on his skin color...you know. You're right too about one thing and I'll admit it right here. I am a born again Christian and I voted for Bush simply because he is a Christian (at least he claims to be). That was 8 years ago, I was younger and it was the very first time I voted believe it or not! I grew up in a very big family, was raised a strict Catholic and everything...I mean everything was God related. I don't have an issue with it being God related or Christ related; however, I'm beginning to see that just because something looks good, doesn't mean it is good. It's that whole, wolf in sheeps clothing lesson I'm learning this late in life. Because I was sheltered like crazy, it has taken me a long time to kind of sort things out. Sometimes, I get myself into big trouble with some of the things I think about outloud!

Posted on 08/01/2008 at 8:08:07 AM

 
Mary, a good chunk of the electorate votes for a candidate for all sorts of silly reasons.....you bring up Bush....like voting for him because he talks to Jesus....my point is I wish more people would make informed choices, but with what's at stake, I'll take Obama votes for whatever reason brought 'em...

Posted on 07/30/2008 at 6:07:49 PM

 
Uh, it's okay for people to vote anyway they'd like. If for instance, someone who is black chooses to vote for Obama based on the color of his skin, than I think that person is a racist! No two ways about it. You don't vote for someone based on the color of their skin for Christ's sake you vote for them based on their abilities and if they have the right credentials, the right motives as to why they are running to begin with. If someone is voting for Obama based on just those facts, that he's black...God help us all! That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard! That'd be like votiing for Bush again based on the fact he's from Texas and has an southern, good ole boy accent! By the way peeps...for the miilionth time in a row...Obama is Biratial...he's not black and he's not white...he's both!

Posted on 07/30/2008 at 5:07:05 PM

 
One thing to consider - the majority of black people were planning on voting for Hillary Clinton as late as November '07. Black people are not voting for Obama just because he's black - it's because he's the best candidate for President and because the Clinton's have been extremely condescending towards black people during this election (Bill Clinton's Jesse Jackson comment for example.) You could look at Clinton winning the majority of the white woman vote and say they are voting for her just because she's a white woman... Hell I've heard people say that Obama wouldnt be where he is if he wasnt black. Would Clinton be where she is if her husband wasn't Bill Clinton? I think not.

Posted on 04/20/2008 at 1:04:57 PM

 
Very true, Andrew...I wasn't suggesting that. If I were choosing between two similar candidates and one was Atheist, though...then it would be the dediding factor.

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 2:03:36 PM

 
"Atheist" doesn't necessarily translate to "liberal/progressive". Case in point - Christopher Hitchens who wrote God Is Not Good yet supports Bush's "War on Terror" because he hates and fears right wing Muslims more than he fears right wing Christians. Easy enough for him to say when he's British and doesn't have to live everyday with all the wannabe Confederate States of America loyalists who wrap themselves in the flag of a union they despise.

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 2:03:57 PM

 
Well put, both of you!

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 12:03:18 PM

 
He is also not Muslim...as many of the uniformed like to 'point out'. It will take years to undue some of the damage done to America by the poltics of greed and hopelessness...and I believe Obama is a great starting point.

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 12:03:26 PM

 
What is often overlooked during this election is the fact that Barack Obama is biracial. It's telling that we as a people label someone not by who or even what they are, but by how they look.

Posted on 03/03/2008 at 11:03:10 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 10 of 10
 
Advertisment