Find » Opinion/Editorial » Pit Bulls and a Bad Law in Ontario

Pit Bulls and a Bad Law in Ontario

By Youranter, published Sep 18, 2006
Published Content: 114  Total Views: 20,601  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.9 of 5
Some time ago, I forget the exact date, our wise and esteemed Attorney General passed a law outlawing pit bulls. Many people think this is a good thing as fewer children will have their faces ripped off by these vicious dogs. Pit bulls must be leashed, muzzled and neutered. Eventually, the thinking goes, they will die out and we won't have problems with them anymore. 

The trouble is, no one seems to know just what a pit bull is. It certainly is not a breed recognized by either the Canadian or American Kennel Clubs. There are American pit bull terriers, mastiffs, Staffordshire bull terriers, etc., etc., etc. When confronted with pictures of various dog breeds and asked to pick out the pit bull, Mr. Bryant (the AG) couldn't do it. So he did the next best thing. He banned any and all breeds that have the major characteristics of pit bull terriers. This includes cross bred dogs. Even if the cross breeding results in a gentler, more even tempered animal, they are on the ‘soon to be extinct' list. No one denies the fact that the original animal was bred to be a fierce fighter and champion of its territory. Hell, if I had to leave my wife for any extended time, I would sure want a dog like that around to look after her. German shepherds, Dobermans and Rottweilers were all originally bred the same way, for the same purpose. Yet through years of breeding and cross breeding, they have become much more manageable and thus much more acceptable to society. The problem really arose when some nitwits figured out that pit bulls would make excellent combatants in the world of dog fighting. They certainly did and soon the drug dealers were taking a serious look at the dog to prove that ‘mine is bigger than yours', if you get my drift. Much like a small man has to buy a Camaro to make up for his own physical inadequacies. 

Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
 
hello all you people in tv land?

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
hello all you people in tv land?

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
hello all you people in tv land?

Posted on 10/10/2007 at 9:10:00 AM

 
S L, yes, your dog would have been banned. Mr. Bryant, our Attorney General, was shown a series of pictures of various breeds of dogs and asked to pick out the pit bulls. He couldn't do it. So he banned anything that came remotely close. Veteranarians, kennel clubs and the general populace agreed with you, it is the owner, not the dog. My wife owned what she refers to as "the dumbest dog in all of England", a threat to no man or beast, but over here, he would have been banned. BTW, 18 years is a long time to have a dog. I'm sorry he's gone, but I'll bet you enjoyed every minute with him.

Posted on 10/29/2006 at 6:10:00 AM

 
You're right Sunny. Then the dog goes down, no question. But what is a pit bull? That's the gist of the whole article. They banned everything that remotely looks like a pit bull. In England the Staffordshire bull terrier is still allowed where the American pit bull is not. It is not fair to lump a group of dogs together because of their looks. And that's what this government has done. It doesn't know what it's talking about, but passes assinine laws anyway.

Posted on 10/28/2006 at 3:10:00 AM

 
Until it's your child, spouse or friend who is attacked by one.

Posted on 10/15/2006 at 7:10:00 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
 
Most Commented On