Southwest Airlines 10.2 Million Fine Draws More Doubt About U.S. Airline Safety

Jeff Musall
Jeff Musall
  • Published Content: 342
  • Total Views: 217,044
  • Favorited By: 92 CPs
Full Profile | Subscribe | Add to Favorites
The airline industry in America was fairly regulated until 1978, when sweeping reforms were passed to streamline airline routes and service and to allow for more flexibility. By itself, it wasn't a bad move. With some tweaking the original goals could have been met without all of the chaos that has
since plagued the airlines. Spikes in fuel prices and the inability for some carriers to adapt led to names that had become synonymous with air travel falling away. They were joined by dozens of upstarts and also-rans. Some of the new starters made it, and are still around today. One of the best known of the up and comers has been Southwest Airlines.

Touted as the low price airline that provided good service, Southwest grew into a big player. Kind of the "Wal-Mart of the air," Southwest served markets under-served and in doing so did quite well. Of course, the reality isn't quite as rosy. Just like Wal-Mart, Southwest has a dirty underbelly. Low pay and for employees and "peanut" flights. And the tendency to sometimes cut corners. I worked in the airline business back in the 90's and remember Southwest having a bit of a cheater's reputation. Tricks like pulling a gate a few inches away from a plane and then pushing the aircraft a few inches back to get an "on time departure." Still, they did emerge as the model for low price carriers.

Now comes the news that they were doing what should be the unthinkable in the airline business. Not only did they not do required checks on aircraft in a timely manner, they kept come some of them flying even after they knew about the violations. The FAA announced a huge fine, 10.2 million dollars. And now comes news that some in the FAA knew about it, and allowed the planes to continue to fly. If that assertion proves to be true it makes one wonder. Were there payoffs? Is Southwest a big Bush donor? Who knows.

  • Some in the FAA knew Southwest was breaking rules.
  • It is a very big deal to fly an aircraft that doesn't meet airworthiness.
 
Comments 1 - 5 of 5  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below
Jeff, thanks for the clarification.

Posted on 03/09/2008 at 2:03:22 PM

Monique, the part where I draw a corelation between the policies and McCain is that he has pledged to the conservative base to continue the policies of stripping down government agencies and oversight. I would expect him to be better than Bush at aviation safety, having the background he does. But I wouldn't expect him to consider funding the FAA and re-establishing it's mandates to the levels required. The failures are more than just the failures of Bush - they reflect a failure in policy and direction for the current conservative models of government.

Posted on 03/09/2008 at 12:03:25 PM

Jeff , this seems to be an article about airline fines and duct tape maintenance. Only to click on the second page to find myself reading anti-McCain remarks. I completely followed the Bush government lack of funding responsibility. But there needs to be more of a correlation drawn to bring McCain in to the conversation. Has John McCain ever voted to limit FAA rules/regs/employees? If he has, then your argument could be expanded. I worked in Naval Aviation and we had something we called "war paint," as in the paint covering up duct tape patches in the air frame. That was 1998-2001, when we were at peace. I wonder at what our soldiers fly in? And I wonder how air craft maintenance personnel can willingly endanger passengers with lack maintenance. Good topic.

Posted on 03/09/2008 at 4:03:49 AM

This kind of thing makes me glad I don't travel by plane much anymore.

Posted on 03/08/2008 at 9:03:59 AM

Yep!

Posted on 03/08/2008 at 6:03:04 AM

Comments 1 - 5 of 5 

Have more to say?
Become a Content Producer on AC