Find » Opinion/Editorial » Alberto Gonzales: A new fox to guar...

Alberto Gonzales: A new fox to guard the henhouse

Will Gonzales do more damage than Ashcroft?

By Mary Shaw, published Mar 15, 2005
Published Content: 31  Total Views: 0  Favorited By: 3 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 2.9 of 5
While civil libertarians throughout the U.S. shed no tears over the resignation of Attorney General John Ashcroft, many are wondering if his replacement, former White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales, might ultimately take matters from bad to worse.

Ashcroft's PATRIOT Act and detentions of countless noncitizens for indefinite lengths of time without charge and without legal recourse sparked a public outcry that led to extensive lobbying efforts in favor of reforms to safeguard human rights. Some of those efforts have been successful; others not. But, in the media, those concerns have been overshadowed by the reports of yet another kind of human rights abuse by the Bush administration - the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and elsewhere.

The images of naked prisoners stacked in human pyramids or trembling in front of snarling dogs are forever etched in the memories of all who saw the shocking photos. To many, the image of the hooded prisoner on a box with wires extending from his appendages has become a more fitting symbol of American "values" than the Statue of Liberty.

And, as most citizens of the world have learned by now, that stage was set by Gonzales, who, in his famous "torture memo", described the Geneva Conventions as "quaint" and advised the Bush administration of ways to skirt international law while reducing the risk of criminal liability. As a result, not only have countless detainees endured unthinkable suffering and humiliation, but our national reputation has suffered, too, in ways that may take decades to repair.

And who is paying the price? Low-level soldiers like Lynndie England and Charles Graner, not Gonzales, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, or any other high-level officials who are ultimately responsible for U.S. policy. Indeed, instead of holding Gonzales accountable for the atrocities he endorsed and enabled, President Bush rewarded him by placing him at the head of the U.S. Department of Justice. The irony would be almost poetic if the ramifications weren't so alarming.

Comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
Torture advocate, US Attorney, 'Fredo' Gonzales has resigned underneath the sacrificial Blood Moon of prophecy.

Posted on 08/27/2007 at 8:08:00 PM

 
The Theory of Torture - In the "Third Institute," Coke writes that "there is no law to warrant tortures in this land, nor can they be justified by any prescription" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jardin inferred that the power to torture was regarded as part of the royal prerogative ...inflicting torture at pleasure at the mere instance of the Crown, has always appeared to me to be a very remarkable instance of the opposition of a prerogative to law-of the existence in former times of a power above the law, controlling and subverting the law, and thus rendering it practical application altogether inconsistent with its theoretical excellence. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/294075/torture_and_the_law_of_proof_.html?page=2

Posted on 06/26/2007 at 8:06:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Advertisment