A Layman Shoots the Great Ice Age Migration Theory in the Foot

By Rudy C. Granados, published Mar 12, 2008
Published Content: 41  Total Views: 6,397  Favorited By: 2 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
Thousands of years ago the western continents we now know as the Americas were open spaces of land, vegetation and animals. No human had ever stepped foot on these continents until the great ice age migrations around 15 thousand years ago. Scientists believe that the migration happened in two stages, and followed two universally accepted routes, both leading to same destination. The first route passing through the western coastline of the present day United States, and a few thousand years later, the second route by way of the central plains. This is how humans from the Euro-Asian continent, crossed over on ice between the continental plates, entering into North America, and they did not stop there. These migrants continued on until reaching the tropical Yucatan peninsula in Central America, where they settled and founded great cities. Other migrants eventually wandered down as far as the southern tip of Argentina.

The great minds of science and archeology tell us that this is fact. It is taught in schools, and can be quoted in books. Science will present us with artifacts and research to prove these facts. Widely accepted scientific theories rest their validation on these facts. Are they right? Sure they are, as right as anyone else can be, trying to explain what happened fifteen thousand years ago, with nobody around but primitive humans. True, migration is a common trait and aspiration in human beings, and the scientific proof is difficult to dismiss. To science, the facts have been proven to be valid, and these are the present facts. Unfortunately for science, you do not have to be a learned scholar to know that they can get it wrong at times. They have gotten it wrong in the past before. Let us not forget our recent change in the solar system. Now that we no longer have nine 'planets', maybe it is time to reexamine their other scientific facts. We should not reexamine these facts because we suspect scientists of any conspiracy, but because there is no harm in supposing a different thought. Different perspectives often lead to new ideas.

A Layman Shoots the Great Ice Age Migration Theory in the Foot

Does the Ice Age Migration theory make sense?

Credit: 2008 GRANAMEDIA A/Video Productions

Copyright: Rudy C. Granados

Takeaways
  • Why did the migrants bypass the US?
  • How did the South Americans evolve so quickly?
  • Why didn't they do the same up north?
Did You Know?
South American pyramids are similar to those in the east.
The Incas began only around 900 AD.
The Spaniards actually conquered Aztec and Incas with disease.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
Finally someone to challenge the text books. Nobody knows for sure do they? But they seem to act like they do. I just read about the latest deal with the hole in the ozone layer, they say that the hole has been slowing the rate of global warming in the south, and that as it heals the temperature will increase. Hmmm.....WTF! In Ohio here we just went through the longest winter that I can remember, if the ice comes not very many people will be able to "Migrate" south out of it, most will be stranded in thier homes trying to wait for the thaw. That just someday won't come, and the snow will get deeper. People do migrate, but it probably wouldn't be a one way trip. Traffic moves BOTH ways. And with snow and ice destroying what was in North America, who's to say what was really here back then. But it isn't PC to suggest that anything was here before the "Native Americans". When something really old is uncovered, it is quickly claimed by the tribes as sacred, then reburied. So

Posted on 05/03/2008 at 8:05:07 AM

 
Sorry, most scientists insist that Canada was covered in ice,and the rest was free of it, maybe as far as to the Dakotas. By the time of the migration, Texas and other lower states definitely were free of ice. This is what scientists say, not me. The ice melt is supposedly how the central plains route opened up for the wanderers. Remember, we have native Americans, so where did they come from if the land was covered in ice? No, scientists say that the central plains and western coast were definitely free of ice, Even if the ice reached Texas and New Mexico, where I live today, the northern sections of these states are rich with trees and vegetation. If they had come thousands of miles over ice, where there is no water, no food, traveling in small bands (because it is unlikely they traveled in organized groups of hundreds), they would have had to pack a lot of supplies. Pack supplies? How could they know how much they would need? Keep in mind that science says these were ignorant and

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 3:03:31 PM

 
primitive humans. In WWII (20th century) the Germans were attacking Russia and came ill-prepared. They soon found their weapons and equipment was freezing solid, just like it happened to their French counterparts a hundred years before. This was only snow several feet high. You could still see the tops of trees and buildings. During th ice age, any vegetation was several hundred feet below ice. Nomads follow herds. What herds were there during the ice age? Mystical animals that survived on ice?

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 3:03:42 PM

 
If I have curved teeth or a bump on my nose, is not the point I am trying to make. We all have various physical traits that make us who we are. I am not saying that we don't share some similarities. I am not even saying that the South Americans evolved from that region. All I am saying is that the migration theory is only a theory, and one that does not make much sense. It makes better sense that the South Americans were brought there. How? Well, that is another subject.

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 3:03:32 PM

 
Rudy, the answer lies in climate. N. Amer. was much colder so they kept heading south. With ice as far south as Texas the Yucatan was more temperate. As the ice retreated settlers moved back north or stayed in the north. And as proof that native inhabitants of the Americas are related to Eurasians, feel the back of your top four teeth. If they are at all cupped toward the front you have native American inhabitant in your blood. I am part Indian and I was always told and that "to look at my Dad and I" there is no doubt we are of part Indian heritage. The cupped teeth are a trait we carry from our ancient Eurasian ancestors. I used to doubt I was part Indian as it seemed everyone claimed they were, but my teeth prove my claim. So if anyone wants to know for sure check the backs of your upper teeth. Cups=American Indian blood somewhere in you.

Posted on 03/13/2008 at 12:03:37 PM

Type in Your Comments Below
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Most Commented On