Find » Society » CIA Announces Capture and Transfer ...

CIA Announces Capture and Transfer of Al Qaeda Terrorist Muhammad Rahim

By saul relative, published Mar 16, 2008
Published Content: 479  Total Views: 510,461  Favorited By: 54 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
Muhammad Rahim al Afghani, described as a high-level al Qaeda operative, was transferred from an undisclosed CIA facility Friday, March 14, to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Pentagon issued this statement: "Muhammad Rahim al-Afghani was a close associate of Osama bin Laden and had ties to Al Qaeda organizations throughout the Middle East. He became one of bin Laden's most trusted facilitators and procurement specialists prior to his detention." Part of the charges against the Afghan is that he aided bin Laden in his flight from the Tora Bora caves to escape capture.

Muhammad Rahim, whose age is unknown, is one of approximately 280 detainees at Guantanamo.

Rahim has denied allegations that he was a member of the Taliban, that he was part of al Qaeda, that he has terrorist ties, knows about certain weapons caches or that he knows anything about the terrorist organization. He does admit to being a conscript of the Taliban. The United States maintains otherwise. Rahim was captured in mid-2007.

The American War on Terror has had several victories against al Qaeda since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, but the latest came when an American Predator drone fired a missile at a compound in Pakistan and killed Abu Laith al-Libi, a lieutenant of bin Laden's and the leader of al Qaeda's network in Afghanistan. Al Libi was also al Qaeda's chief liaison with the Taliban in Afghanistan. Pakistani security officials suspected al Libi was killed but became convinced when Islamist websites began to report his death. Al Libi was killed with about a dozen other militants. It is believed that al Libi was al Qaeda's third ranking operative.

CIA Announces Capture and Transfer of Al Qaeda Terrorist Muhammad Rahim
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
 
You can't measure the lives saved, Lenora, (it's a unknown potentiality) but you can the lives lost to the handiwork of these guys (well, what you can pin on them). And I don't believe it actually matters where these guys strike. Terrorism is terrorism. And I don't mean people blowing up other people in a war zone, either (something our government likes to include under their blanket definition of terrorism). I'm talking about bombings and killings in public areas for mass trauma effect, such as market bombings in Baghdad and embassy bombings. Bush and his bunch of fear mongers like to include attacks on military detachments and vehicles. Those are acts of war (albeit guerilla) and should be regarded as such. Bush and the bobbleheads enjoy blurring the lines for political effect...

Posted on 03/17/2008 at 9:03:23 AM

 
fgkopdifgopik;sdflkgoapjkfl;

Posted on 03/16/2008 at 7:03:09 PM

 
Your last paragraph sums it --- and the difficulty of the "war on terror" best --- results like this are hard to measure -- are they measured in lives saved, or lives lost? are they measured in whether we have been attacked on American soil, or whether our friends and allies have been attacked around the world? It is a sticky thing. At least another one bites the dust.

Posted on 03/16/2008 at 5:03:26 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
 
Most Commented On