Find » Arts & Entertainment » Movies » No Country for Old Men

No Country for Old Men

By Derek Fleek, published Mar 17, 2008
Published Content: 93  Total Views: 6,674  Favorited By: 11 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.0 of 5
"No Country For Old Men" stars Josh Brolin, Javier Bardem, Tommy Lee Jones, and co-stars Woody Harrelson. It's Directed by Joel and Ethan Cohen, who are credited with the screenplay for this adaption of the Cormac McCarthy novel.

In Texas, a hunter named Llewelyn Moss (Josh Brolin) stumbles upon a drug deal gone terribly wrong. Instead of reporting this to the police, like any normal person would, he decides to take the two million dollars left at the scene. This leaves he wanted by a psychopath (Javier Bardem) and by a soon-to-be retired Sheriff named Ed Tom (Tommy Lee Jones).

The words masterpiece and flawless seemed to be used to describe this movie without hesitation. This is hard to believe as I nearly fell asleep during it. What could have been a taunt and disturbing thriller ends up being sluggish and with a disappointing aftermath. The camera work was swift and the direction was solid, but was the acting really that good? Javier Bardem gives a mannequin like performance that isn't anywhere near disturbing, repeating lines like "Call it." and "Where does he live?". This is a role that anyone could have achieved as to the strong performance by Hal Holbrook in the film "Into the Wild".

One of the major problems here is it's absent of a mesmerizing score, or even a score for that matter. Before movies even had sound, they had music. It's hard to appreciate a film that lacks the oldest form of entertainment. No music equals a yawn here and a sigh there. It's probably more interesting to read then to watch. I began to lose interest in the dialog, and dialog is what the tasteless ending is composed of. Dare I say that this is a true snoozer. Why did this win best movie of the year? Why did Javier Bardem win best supporting actor, giving a lazy and emotionless performance? It just doesn't feel right.

Comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
It is sad. I have to agree and I even wrote in my review (I believe) that he doesn't deserve to be nominated...I don't see why he was. Nothing against him and his happiness for winning, I just don't see how what he did was better than anyone else's performance. The movie lacked...There Will Be Blood was better and had better score (that was not nominated, go figure, for best score). I think there was some really good lines in this movie, though. Like the conversations between the wife and husband and those extras were funny. Southern accents give a great biting-ness to sarcasm.

Posted on 03/21/2008 at 9:03:53 AM

 
Over-hyped artsy fartsy crap...the dog chase scene was great, but overall ugh

Posted on 03/19/2008 at 11:03:13 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Advertisment