Freedom of Information vs Police: Can Police Confiscate Cameras?

Should Police Be Able to Take Cameras If People Take Photos of Them Doing Their Job?

By Lucinda Gunnin, published Oct 03, 2006
Published Content: 202  Total Views: 142,067  Favorited By: 25 CPs
Rating: 4.3 of 5
Does a photographer have the right to take pictures of public officials in the commission of their duties? 

Dr. Jim Kelly, associate professor of journalism at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, posed the question to panel members at a discussion of the Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Act. 

Kelly was part of a panel consisting of media members and local government officials hosted by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at the university. 

Though Kelly related his question mostly to an incident at SIUC a year earlier, he cited five instances in the last five years when citizens or photojournalists had their camera equipment seized by police officials after taking pictures of arrests.
In September, 2005, SIUC student Matt Bowie was crossing campus when he observed a uniformed campus police officer arresting someone. He stopped and began taking pictures. Then, an undercover officer who was in the crowd stepped forward and instructed him to hand over his camera or risk expulsion and arrest. Bowie complied and then headed to the School of Mass Communications to look for allies and to get the equipment returned. 

The camera was returned a day later, thought he film in the camera had been exposed to additional light, making the pictures difficult, but not impossible, to process. The university offered little in the way of explanation and has turned over an investigation into the incident to state officials. A year later, they have not offered any report on whether the officer acted properly. 

The point of contention is whether a journalist, or any one else with a camera or camera phone, should be allowed to take photos of police while making arrests. And, strangely, the only one who answered the question directly was a police chief from suburban St. Louis. He acknowledged the right of the public to take pictures, but said given the circumstances, he would have approached the photographer and their news organization to discuss withholding the photos. 

Takeaways
  • Police can and do confiscate cameras without a warrant or making an arrest.
  • The right to know versus the right to privacy debate is growing.
  • Camera confiscation cases are on the rise.
Did You Know?
The state of Illinois is investigating the incident at Southern Illinois University. after a year, very little concrete information is available.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
 
I agree, Jeff. My husband is a photographer and said he would never have surrendered his camera the way Bowie did, but apparently someone is going to have to challenge this in court because the university certainly doesn't seem to be supporting the First Amendment.

Posted on 10/03/2006 at 8:10:00 PM

 
It is not illegal to take pictures of the general public or the police, and should not be when the two cross paths. Of course, now someone taking pictures of political protests could potentially be called an 'enemy combatant" so I guess all bets are off...

Posted on 10/03/2006 at 6:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
 
Most Commented On