ATT U-verse, What You Need to Know Before You Order It

Att U-verse VS Cable & DSL

I had DSL Internet connection provided by AT&T for 4 or 5 years. My cable was provided by Time Warner. I was happy with the service provided by both companies and I rarely had any trouble. I'd also like to be upfront about the fact I am an AT&T retiree and I receive a small concession on
 all AT&T products or services that I use. Several months ago I was notified that the new ATT U-verse (which combines cable and Internet as a bundle package) was available in my area.

I got on line and did some research as to what I'd be getting compared to what Time Warner provided, the channel line up and the cost. I never at any time considered the Internet factor, because I assumed my Internet connection would stay the same. There were several packages offered. I decided I liked the A300 package which provided over 240 channels including 31 premium channels (Starz, Showtime, The Movie Channel, Encore & FLIX), all local channels and 34 digital music channels. It also included up to 3 receivers, one with DVR at no additional cost. The cost for the A300 (without my concession) was $79.00/month (+ $25.00/month for Internet). I was paying $69.00/month to Time Warner for 1/2 as many cable stations and 1 only premium channel - HBO. I didn't have DVR -just 1 receiver. There was really no difficulty in deciding that AT&T was the best choice, so I made the call and placed my order..

The AT&T installer came to home on the day scheduled. I was given a time frame of 2-4 and he got to my house at 5:30. I ordered 2 receivers, he came with just the DVR. He told me to call the business office and set up another installation date for the second receiver, because his order said I ordered 1 and that was all they sent him out with. The installer worked fast and after the hook up was complete he took the time to explain how the DVR and remote worked. He then disconnected the DSL and set up a wireless connection, made sure I had access to the Internet and left.

 
Comments 1 - 6 of 6  
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I DEFINATELY WILL NOT SWITCH MY ATT DSL TO U-VERSE, WHICH IS WHAT I WAS ABOUT TO DO.

Posted on 07/29/2008 at 12:07:00 PM

This is very helpful as we are currently looking to change our service. Thank you

Posted on 03/29/2008 at 11:03:14 AM

AT&T was back today and hardwired everything--I'm back to my old fast speed.

Posted on 03/25/2008 at 1:03:43 PM

[CONTINUED FROM BELOW] return and switch your Internet connection from wireless to hard-wired (assuming that's a workable option for your situation). Thanks for your review!

Posted on 03/23/2008 at 4:03:45 PM

YOU WROTE: "What AT&T didn't tell me and what they will not tell you is that a wireless connection is slower than a hard wired connection." Indeed, my U-Verse installer likewise had initially made it sound as though there'd be no problems with a wireless connection; but I immediately told him that I prefer the reliability of a HARD-wired connection whenever possible. Thus (unlike you), I've been having no such reduction in speed when surfing the web. However, I'd be remiss not to mention that my web surfing is not at all faster or better via U-Verse than it had been with the (separately available) AT&T DSL service that I'd already had for the prior two years. [In short, U-Verse's chief advantage is its remarkable TELEVISION-watching experience, not its web-surfing experience (the latter behaves like merely typical DSL, at best).] In any case, I recommend that all U-Verse subscribers opt for the HARD-wired Internet connection if at all possible. In your case, just have the installer ret

Posted on 03/23/2008 at 4:03:19 PM

Thanks for sharing your first hand experience! My hubby is an IT pro so he keeps our connection up and running :)

Posted on 03/23/2008 at 1:03:57 PM

Comments 1 - 6 of 6