Bill Richardson: An Example of Hypocrisy and Obama's Divisive Politics of Race

By Robert Vinciguerra, published Mar 24, 2008
Published Content: 101  Total Views: 33,989  Favorited By: 4 CPs
Rating: 3.0 of 5
For nearly three months now, New Mexico governor and former Democratic Presidential candidate, Bill Richardson, has been saying publicly that he hadn't made an endorsement because he felt that his endorsement would be insignificant.

"I don't think that endorsements are really all that important," Richardson told Chris Matthews, just prior to February 5th's Super Tuesday. "I may endorse, I may not. I don't think that anything I have to say will actually make a difference."

Recently, Richardson did make an endorsement, announcing that his support is now behind Barack Obama.

When asked for comment, Clinton advisor Mark Penn said, "The time that he could have been effective has long since passed," he continued. "I don't think it is a significant endorsement in this environment."

This statement is true. Richardson's endorsement could've been substantial prior to Super Tuesday when a number of states, including New Mexico, held their nominating contests. Instead of endorsing, Richardson watched football with his former boss, President Bill Clinton.

Had Richardson's endorsement immediately followed his withdraw from the race, what little national support he had garnered may have given a small boost to the endorsee. However, at this late stage when the campaign has become focused on a few small states, the endorsement of a New Mexico governor probably has no affect on the decisions that voters will be making in Pennsylvania, Indiana, Puerto Rico, and North Carolina.

Despite the truth that logic and reason clearly outline, and in the face of his own words, Bill Richardson chooses to attack the Clinton campaign with the card that his new friend, Obama, has been using for quite some time: The divisive politics of race.

Gov. Richardson could've acknowledged that, other providing Obama with one additional superdelegate, his endorsement means little at this point. However, he did not do that. Instead, he lobbed unfounded racially charged allegations, where no racial implications previously existed.

Takeaways
  • Richardson says political endorsements are insignificant
  • Richardson endorses Barack Obama
  • Richardson implies that Clinton campaign is racist
Comments
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
 
I wonder why the Obama supporters havent picked up on the hypocrisy of Obama demanding super delegates to pick the nominee that won their state, while at the same time accepting support from the likes of Richardson. In my opinion, he should have remained neutral. But maybe thats the person he is, and maybe thats the person Obama is. This election is really about the politics of Bushism vs. the politics of Clintonism. Bill Clinton came in '92 with a different campaign approach, so did Bush 8 years later. Since Bush won in 2000, theres been an inside debate among party members and supporters of whether or not the party should use the same tricks Bush used. Since Hillary has ran on the approach she knows best (the clinton way), and given Obamas unwillingness to allow Florida and Michigan to count, Obama seems to be trying out the tricks liberals have been crying about for 7 years. Ironic, and liberals call Hillary the bad one!

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 8:04:31 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comment 1 of 1
 
Most Commented On