Analysis of Ethical Egoism and Psychological Egoism

When dealing with the field of modern ethics there are two theories that stand out. Both Psychological Egoism and Ethical Egoism have been analyzed and looked at by a number of philosophers. Their studies show what each theory is, its applications in real world situations, and its support and critiques. The two theories will be discussed in terms of differences between them and, contrasts in the doctrines of motivation.

Ethical Egoists care mainly about themselves; they primarily think about how they can benefit from each station. They also believe that life shouldn't involve sacrifices. They don't believe that they should sacrifice themselves for anyone and no one should sacrifice themselves for them. The reason for this is that they interpret sacrifices as saying that you are better than someone else or that someone else is better than you. They believe that selfness is their key virtue. " You ought always act selfish" which can be interpreted as looking out for your own personal interest. They believe that we should not help people, because people should know what is best for them selves. Ethical Egoists only act on what will benefit them. For example they might call a friend who is sick, because they want to make sure that someone will be calling them when they are sick. Acting selfishly creates a better world, in their opinion. They believe that most people are selfish; they just don't admit it.

There are three types of Ethical Egoism. The first type is called Personal Ethical Egoism; this is where a person says "I am going to act only in my own interest." The second is called Individual Ethical Egoism; this is where someone believes that everyone should act in their best interest. Finally, the third type of Ethical Egoism is Universal. This is where everyone acts in their own self-interest.