Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead and Hamlet Doesn't Look Too Good

By Timothy Sexton, published Aug 08, 2005
Published Content: 2,748  Total Views: 2,379,583  Favorited By: 217 CPs
Rating: 3.1 of 5
Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead belongs to a genre of drama that challenges the notion of traditional realistic and instructive theater by presenting a universe that is absurd, stripped of all pretensions of order and purpose. Stoppard's play presents a universe that understands that Hamlet's melodramatic play-within-a-play The Mousetrap can no more hold the answer to the psychological secrets of Claudius than Shakespeare's play Hamlet itself can hold the answer to the psychological secrets of any of its readers. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead rejects the idea that a meaningful psychoanalytical realism can be constructed from the fictive world of Hamlet by reducing the so-called greatest play ever written to an absurdist histrionic melodrama high in blood but low in comprehensible rhetoric that allows for much profound relevance.

Takeaways
  • Stoppard's play rejects the idea of psycholanalytical realism at work in Hamlet.
  • Using disconnectivity, Stoppard boils Hamlet down to a series of melodramatic highlights.
  • Shakespeare's poetry proves that English language makes up in obscurity what it lacks in style.
Did You Know?
Hamlet was not regarded as Shakespeare's greatest play until the end of the 19th century?
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Most Commented On