The Five Greatest Hitters in Major League Baseball History

The Eternal Baseball Argument Continues

By Johnny Moon, published Oct 06, 2006
Published Content: 114  Total Views: 152,182  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Rating: 4.0 of 5
One of the great things about baseball is the endless arguments about which players are the greatest. I want to add to these endless arguments my own argument for the five greatest hitters in major league baseball history. When compiling any list of “the Greatest _____” it’s important to be clear on your criteria.

Criteria

-My list is based on the peak 5 year stretch of any hitter. There’s a big difference between asking which players had the longest stretch of great play and which players had the greatest single season. I am looking for something in between these two extremes. I want to compare the greatest hitters of all time at their absolute peak, not on their way up and not on their way down.

-I’m only considering players who began their career after 1900. 19th century baseball while very interesting historically I just don’t think can be compared to today’s game. It’s hard enough comparing players of these different eras already but in the 19th century the game was still being formed and the rules were being changed too quickly for it to make any sense to compare their numbers with today’s.

The List

The Five Greatest Hitters in Major League Baseball History

Babe Ruth

Credit: Public Domain

Copyright: Public Domain

Takeaways
  • Barry Bonds is the all time leader in slugging percentage at .863 in 2001.
  • Barry Bonds is the all time leader in on base percentage at .609 in 2004.
  • Babe Ruth's numbers are inflated in 1920 and 1921 due to Polo Grounds.
Did You Know?
Ty Cobb led the American League in home runs with 9 in 1909.
Resources
  • Baseball WarehouseMajor League BaseballMajor League Baseball TicketsFan's Edge
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
 
Steve Garvey powerhitter gallore!

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 8:07:56 PM

 
Ruth was the greatest. Look at the dominance over other players during his era. Also lets see if Bonds could win 94 games in the big leagues pitching after being a hitter like Babe did before he was an outfilder. No contest Ted Williams who knew a little about hitting ranked Babe number one hitter of all time. Check the fense distances back in the 20s and 30s compared to now and the balls and bats.

Posted on 04/02/2008 at 3:04:25 PM

 
It's an unpopular rating at #1, but it is very difficult to argue this list. JC does make a great point about Ruth doubling the league in HRs, but Johnny specifically stated that his list covers a 5 year period. Again... very difficult to argue against this list.

Posted on 04/17/2007 at 2:04:00 PM

 
http://www.BigShowBaseball.com

Posted on 03/18/2007 at 10:03:00 AM

 
I knew choosing bonds first would cause some controversy, it's all in good fun. It's a close call in my opinion - whenever you are comparing players from different eras it's difficult. Yes the modern era has juiced balls (and juiced players) and if you look at just the power #s they've been ridiculous over the past 10 years but if you look at the overall offensive numbers there have been other eras up there with today's - the 1930s in particular. Also, like I mentioned in the article, very high batting averages were easier to attain in the 20s and 30s, Babe Ruth only lead the league once in batting average despite #s like this : .376, .378, .393, .372, .356, .359, .373 ...

Posted on 10/09/2006 at 10:10:00 AM

 
this applies even to the 2000-2004 time period that you specified by the way..

Posted on 10/09/2006 at 7:10:00 AM

 
No No No!!! Please don't tell me Bonds is at the top of this list Johnny!! Although I can't argue with his domination, I do agree with J.C. Bonds was in his prime in the most offensively prolific era in the history of Baseball. The league juiced the ball, lowered the mounds, shortened fences etc, etc. All to revamp Baseballs popularity

Posted on 10/09/2006 at 7:10:00 AM

 
Wait, your criticizing Ruth's inflated numbers at the Polo Ground, even though he hit more than double the number of HRs than anyone else, but you're saying Bonds is the greatest hitter when he hits 60+ in an era full of guys hitting 45+ or 50+? I don't think so, Mr. Moon.

Posted on 10/06/2006 at 4:10:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 8 of 8
 
Most Commented On