Redefining Marriage and Family

The Current Definition of Marriage and Family is Inadequate and Obsolete

By PHILLIP TOBIAS, published Oct 08, 2006
Published Content: 26  Total Views: 20,119  Favorited By: 23 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.4 of 5
The broadest definition of marriage can be stated as a socially sanctioned  and economic union between at least two individuals.

Marriage and family can mean many things to many people in different cultures. Even within the same culture, individuals may disagree about what constitutes an acceptable marriage or family. 

In the majority of the United States a marriage is defined as the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (www.m-w.com). An American family was traditionally seen as what we call a nuclear family: a mother, father and their children. However that guideline has drastically changed in the last fifty years.  Many Americans now exist in one extended family or one or two single-parent families and/or blended families. 

We as a country should legally redefine marriage into broader terms. A legal marriage would be a union between two or more consenting human adults who do not have a parent/child or sibling relationship. This definition includes polygamy both polyandry and polygyny and monogamy.  Each  person in this country where independence and personal freedoms are so valued  it only makes sense to allow each individual to decide how many wives or husbands is appropriate for themselves. 

Definitions: Polygamy(Multiple Spouses at the same time)

Polygyny (multiple women married to a single male) 

Polyandry ( multiple men married to a single women)

Takeaways
  • Love, marriage and family come in many forms
  • Marriage and religion often do not make for a viable economic model.
  • Monogamous relationships/marriages are actually a minority worldwide.
Did You Know?
Fully 2/3 of the world's societies are polygamous.
Of those 98+% are polygynous. Less than 2% are polyandrous
Comments
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
 
I love that you mentioned that the consenting partner must be a human. I find it soooo ridiculous and aggravating when some halfwit, when discussing gay marriage, says "if we let gays marry, then next people will start marrying animals." I think that is one of the most ignorant, insulting things I've ever heard. You too, apparently.

Posted on 02/02/2008 at 1:02:50 PM

 
You made a lot of interesting points. Nicely written!

Posted on 12/10/2007 at 3:12:44 PM

 
Terrific article!

Posted on 12/09/2007 at 10:12:20 PM

 
good article

Posted on 12/07/2007 at 12:12:00 PM

 
Great article! I'm all for gay marriages. Gay people are human beings and should be allowed to marry and be gay in general. The definiton of marriage should change to include gay people.

Posted on 12/06/2007 at 11:12:00 AM

 
You have many interesting points in this article, I think you could take any one of them and write an article solely on one of those points. I agree - the definition of marriage and family needs to be broadened.

Posted on 12/05/2007 at 5:12:00 AM

 
Wow lots of points here.

Posted on 12/04/2007 at 12:12:00 PM

 
Very well put together article and you had valid points to the need for this.

Posted on 12/01/2007 at 11:12:00 AM

 
Fantastic article! You make some valid points. I firmly support gay marriage. I have several gay friends that have been in more loving and longer lasting relationships than many of my straight friends.

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 11:11:00 PM

 
Great article, Phillip. Thought-provoking and well-written

Posted on 11/30/2007 at 5:11:00 PM

 
Interesting. I don't agree with all of it, but family can definitely mean a multitude of things. I'm not one for debating too much, so I'll just leave it at that. :-)

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 8:11:00 AM

 
I can understand if churches won't sanction a same sex marriage, that's their right and belief. I do believe the State should have no opinion on this and gay marriage as a legal civil union should stand. I have never understood the confusion/uproar.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 6:11:00 AM

 
I'm in the minority. I don't support gay marriage. I won't go into a sermon about why. Well written article, just don't share SOME of your views.

Posted on 11/29/2007 at 6:11:00 AM

 
Well stated.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 10:11:00 PM

 
Wow this is deep. Marriage takes a great level of understanding and forgiveness to survive. Thanks for sharing.

Posted on 11/28/2007 at 1:11:00 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 15 of 20
Next >>
Advertisment