Find » Arts & Entertainment » Music » David Cook, Eleanor Rigby and an Id...

David Cook, Eleanor Rigby and an Idol Controversy?

By Javaman, published Mar 31, 2008
Published Content: 369  Total Views: 39,545  Favorited By: 5 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 3.6 of 5
David Cook, one of the better would-be "Idols" this season, sang brilliantly on the Beatles rendition night. He sang Eleanor Rigby, the well-known song from the Beatles' song book. Evidently the version David sang hit too close to home for the band Doxology from the Seattle-Tacoma area of Washington State. Or did it? Perhaps this rarely heard of band was only attempting to capitalize on David's great performance. What other reason could Doxology have to be upset? Just a quick check on any major search engine shows the band is getting thousands of hits. Let's remember this show is about performing other people's songs. If this show was about creating original music, then perhaps the complaint could have credence.

David chose a song from the Beatles' song book. Idol has said they have purchased rights to these songs. If anyone had a responsibility to clear the version being sung by David it was the Idol producers. Within the structure of the Idol live shows, there certainly is no time for participants to give credits. Also, it is doubtful that with the stress these contestants are under that they would even remember to do so. Given the fact that American Idol is in its seventh season, it is doubtful Idol producers would be negligent where observance of rights is concerned. If credit had been due, no doubt it would have been given.

David Cook will gain in support thanks to Doxology and their lame complaints. This is the "Pastor Wright" moment for David because the blogs and posts of the fans are going nuts in support of him. He probably would have come out on top this week anyway but it's a shoe-in now.

Doxology, on the other hand, is getting the thumbs down, in general from the Idol fans posting on the Internet today. They, Doxology, have what they wanted, and that is some name recognition. Unfortunately for them, it is negative name recognition.

David Cook, Eleanor Rigby and an Idol Controversy?
Comments
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
 
Great submission Javaman! I am in the internet marketing business and currently have over 3,000 pieces of content on AC. I'm slowly working my way up to two million page views. If you keep writing like this, you'll bypass me soon enough! Great job and welcome to AC!

Posted on 04/01/2008 at 11:04:06 PM

 
Was just watching American Idol live and David Cook just admitted it was Doxology's version - that was straight from the horses mouth - hate to say I told you so

Posted on 04/01/2008 at 6:04:08 PM

 
The show is live however the video packages they run prior to singing live are taped and editted - we all know that is taped and not live (usually they are shot earlier that day at the apartments they are staying in). American Idol has already proven that they allow songs to run without total permission - did you not see season 5 with Chris Daughtry - he performed a song without giving credit to the arranger - later in the season that band got to play live on idol with Daughtry as a way for idol to say they were sorry - so again you are wrong in thinking that american idol has not had this exact same situation happen before - look it up research the issue you will find that is has all happened before - and if it has happened once it is very conceivable that it has happened again - no one is perfect - def. not Idol

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 10:03:57 PM

 
Thank you for your comment. My article is an opinion piece. From what I understand and what I have read the tide flows with David on this and not against him. In a recent statement Doxology again says it is the fans they are upset with. Does not that sound like sour milk to you. They are just jealous that they did not get the sales of their version. At least now they have the publicity. I do not understand if the show is live, which it is, how can they edit out comments giving credit. I believe you refer to the week preceeding this last one where the same situation occurred. In any case, I doubt the Idol would allow any contestant to sing a song, in any version, for which they may have problems later. I especially doubt they would put up on I Tunes the song if they did not have the rights. Thank you again for your comments.

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 7:03:16 PM

 
Sorry but I have read articles from Entertainment Weekly, MTV News, The New York Post, and countless other resources that agree that Doxology should have been creddited. In fact, it was recently mentioned that David did give them a shout out prior to performing but it was editted for time - this means that David and American Idol knew to give credit they chose not to. Blake Lewis recently mentioned this in an on-air interview with the Hollywood radio show "2 Guys and A GIrl". This on-air comment has NOT been disputed. Granted American Idol made that decision not to air the credit, to say that David or American Idol does not owe Doxology credit is a very ignorant statement once you read and hear the full story. And again, with major news sources covering the issue (and they research before they print by copyright and seviere penalty of error standards) I have to completely dissagree with you and side with the facts - David knew to give them credit or else he would not have done so

Posted on 03/31/2008 at 7:03:13 PM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Comments 1 - 5 of 5
 
Advertisment