Are You a Lazy Parent?

When it Comes to Parenting, There is More Than One Way to Define "Lazy"

Lazy parenting has become the norm in American society, but typically, suburbanite parents would be quick to disagree. More and more parents are exhausting themselves with secondary duties outside of work, instead of worrying about effective child rearing.
 The results are obvious to outsiders, but not always the parents themselves.

Modern-day parents get lost in stresses such as work or paying bills, and come home only to confuse good parenting with a clean house, a square meal and well-dressed kids. Most parents find time to nurture their children with hugs, kind words, or time spent at a park, but lately, parents are forgetting the importance of early education in the home, specifically reading. Refusing to read to your child or otherwise enrich your toddler is just plain lazy, no matter how much work you do in your house or outside of the home.

Some parents in lower income households admit that subjects such as reading, writing and sometimes even drawing, are best left to schoolhouse professionals, and that it's just too time consuming, demanding or even too messy to do in the home. I've seen this attitude many times first hand, and it's saddening.

Reading to your child every single day is one of the most important and easiest ways to improve your child's demeanor and increase his or her intelligence. One of the most vital aspects of raising a child has become the most neglected in recent years.

I have a friend who is constantly overwhelmed by her four children. She complains about the time it takes to clean her large house although she will admit to spending more time in front of the TV during the day, stewing over her situation than actually cleaning. Her two oldest children are well-behaved but on their own program. Her and her husband have no real goals or expectations for them as they enter high school. The youngest two are complete hell raisers and she admits to being more lenient because she just doesn't have the time to bother with them. She never reads to them and never lets them draw in fear of messing up the walls or furniture.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 17 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

My son couldn't sit still for a book much longer than 5 min by age five. And not at all below 4. Now at 8 he reads at a grade level above and figures out many words by himself. He has a great vocabulary and spells well. I just don't think children's development can be assessed by a reading or non-reading parent. Much too many factors involved, especially with boys. Girls really seem to take to reading as I did as a child.

Posted on 01/22/2009 at 6:01:57 PM

Parents, low income or not, most assuredly need to be reading to their children. However, children can and do often have speech difficulties regardless of their parents' work ethics or laziness. I'd hate to think that I'm being disparaged behind my back because my 2 yera old has delayed speech, when my 5 year old and my 4 year old not only speak well, they speak in multiple syllabled words (that often crack me up to hear). My 2 year old just has "third child syndrome," according to his pediatrician, and he doesn't feel the need to really talk yet, so he doesn't.

Posted on 09/22/2008 at 11:09:54 AM

I agree with you tammy on all of your article but I flet overwhelmed to comment on this one. I wanted to share my story and show that you are not only telling facts but true facts also. I have a 9 year old daughter , who from her very birth I read to daily and I noticed the diffrence from other child. Mainly my nephew. My nephew, who's mother is very lazy when it comes to the kids and I have never seen her spen one day reading to them has a real bad speech problem and has always has it. He is 5 yrs old and just learned how to spell his name, after going to preschool. Whereas My child knew how to spell her name at the age of 3 and her name is Cassidy so it's not a short name. Her reading has been good, not the best even though I do read to her, but I noticed a big diffrenence in her writng and speech from other kids her age.

Posted on 08/01/2008 at 11:08:51 AM

I'm not sure that your argument supports your premise. Reading to your children doesn't mean you aren't lazy and not reading doesn't make you lazy. There are too many factors. If you want to write about the importance of reading to your child, try doing it in a non-inflammatory way without degrading someone who is unfortunate enough to think you are her friend. And maybe, just maybe, include some actual research. You should have titled this, "This is Why I'm a Better Mother Than My Friend."

Posted on 07/30/2008 at 9:07:02 AM

After making a suggestion that insufficient reading to children causes early childhood speech deficits, asking parents whose children have such deficits not to take it personally is a tall order. Tammy, you interpreted your personal experience as a reflection of the general reality. Once you've done that, it is only logical that other people will take your interpretation of the general reality and apply it to their personal experiences. Sweeping generalizations on topics painful to many parents are bound to cause protest. Don't take it personally, now. To begin with, reading should be an integral part of THE PARENTS' life. The real problem is that most Americans don't read, period (sorry, school assignments don't count) -- and when there is no culture of reading, this is reflected in children's early upbringing. This is not "laziness"; it's a sad, sad cultural phenomenon, and characterizing reading to one's children as "work", rather than a pastime, will only reinforce it.

Posted on 07/16/2008 at 10:07:04 AM

I am a single mother and work a full time job. i am definatley considered low income. I did not like the comment that many low income families do not think it is important to read to thier children. Many well to do families are to BUSY to even pay attention to thier children let alone read to them on a regular basis. I think parents of any income level and education level make a choice to read and engage thier children or to ignore there development. I do agree with reading to children every day and starting when they are babies don't wait until they are toddlers. I had a women stop me in a grociery store when my son was about three and she asked "why do you talk to him like he is an adult he is just a baby" I answered he is not a baby and how should i speak to my toddler. I think many Americans' do not take the time to teach thier children reading, writing, and manners.Many people except our teachers to take on all of these responsblities.

Posted on 06/10/2008 at 11:06:47 AM

People seem more concerned with bashing Tammy G than reflecting on the message she was trying to convey. I don't think that anyone arguing against her point would honestly say that children SHOULDN'T be read to. Tammy is pointing out the differences she found in her own children, and how concentrating on correcting her 2nd child's reading and speaking abilities made a huge difference. If that was the only variable, and she found positive results, then it's reasonable to deduce that the Hooked on Phonics made a positive change. I came upon this article after reading her articles on Jon & Kate Plus 8 - it seems to me that commenters with the most criticisms of the articles express more personal attacks vs. debating the message. I think that says a lot about their character - those feeling the most outraged I would guess feel some sort of guilt and see themselves reflected in the negative statements toward the lazy parents, or in the Jon & Kate article, Kate.

Posted on 06/03/2008 at 1:06:34 PM

Tammy, just because you are a self-proclaimed good wife and loving mom who reads to her children, does that give you the right to call anyone who doesn't read to their children lazy? I think not. Get off your high horse. BTW dear, you might want to hone your writing skills (being that you're so well-read on the subject). Your sentence, "Her and her husband have no real goals or expectations for them as they enter high school" is grammatically incorrect. It should read "She and her husband...."

Posted on 05/05/2008 at 12:05:15 AM

If you read my article, then you would be able to answer the first half of that question. Of course I have children - I said so and gave an example of my own experience in this matter. I've also taken a couple courses on early childhood development in passing, but that information pales in comparison with real life experiences, in my case anyway. So much of this is common sense, especially if you are an involved parent by nature.

Posted on 04/29/2008 at 5:04:19 PM

Do YOU have children? You seem to have a lot to say about family life and raising children. I was just wondering what your education or experience was in this subject.

Posted on 04/29/2008 at 12:04:31 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 17 Next >>