Find » Opinion/Editorial » Why This Feminist Won't Vote for Cl...

Why This Feminist Won't Vote for Clinton

8 Reasons Why I've Been Turned Off From the Clinton Campaign

By Racheline Maltese, published Apr 07, 2008
Published Content: 157  Total Views: 218,691  Favorited By: 41 CPs
Embed:  
Rating: 4.6 of 5
One of my biggest problems with Hillary Clinton's candidacy is the expectation both from her camp and from the media that women will (and should) vote for her because of gender. While she does have relatively strong support amongst women (although Obama has thankfully pulled more or less even with her), the expectation is getting tiring.

As a feminist, here are just some of the reasons Hillary Clinton is not my candidate.

1. I am discomforted by the idea that Hillary Clinton's eight years as first lady somehow translates into "experience" for the presidency. It strikes me as a woman defining herself by her partner, and that's not a message I like.

2. The Monica Lewinsky scandal isn't doing anyone any favors. I don't think sex and sex scandals are reasons to vote or not vote for a candidate, but I do think how they are handled matters. And I don't like how Hillary Clinton has repeatedly used the Lewinsky affair as an example of her strength, as an excuse to talk about her faith, and as a veiled demand that I, as a woman, identify with her experience of an unfaithful mate. A powerful man getting sex from a woman not his wife isn't interesting, surprising or relevant to my life, and the notion that it is or should be offends me as a feminist.

3. Hillary Clinton talking about the glass ceiling seems a little silly. Yes, people in this country are still sexist in appalling ways and women have to combat all sorts of ridiculous notions to rise in the ranks in virtually any endeavor. However, Hillary Clinton comes from a background of privilege and her becoming president will not, actually, change any of those things. Additionally, with her education, economic background and access to power (really, how many women can just up and move to New York so they can be a senator?) I have to argue that Hillary Clinton's glass ceiling is a lot thinner than that of most women, and therefore, ultimately irrelevant to my own feminist existence.

Takeaways
  • Hillary Clinton's pandering to the female vote is turning me off as a feminist.
  • Hillary Clinton seems to unsure of her own identity for me to vote for her.
  • Hillary Clinton seems to have forgotten that war is not a feminist value.
Comments
Showing Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
 
(Cont.) so we aren't going to do it." This mentality is aggravating. Finally, Hillary exudes confidence everywhere she campaigns. And as for the pitch in her voice, "oratorical skills" as you call it, Why is it that three of your points have questions at the end? Why can't Hillary Clinton? Why not you? If you can do a better job of leading a whole nation out of the quagmire of a male war lord, do it! I will be the first to vote for you? Would you have the guts to stand toe to toe with another candidate? How can someone say that Hillary has no confidence? I respect your opinion, but take another look...

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 1:05:24 PM

 
(cont.) 2. As for the Monica Lewinsky affair, why should that isue be relavent to Hillary's campaign? Just because YOU personally aren't affected, you act as if everything she is stating has to pertian to you. Barack makes it a point to bring up African-American issues in his rallies; Do these personally pertain you you? 3. Barack also comes from a background of privilege: He was born In Hawaii with loving grandparents and a mother who loves him. Many candidates live a life of privilege. Why should Hillary be singled out? 4. You are letting your feminist pig-headedness cover your eyes to what is really important! I am woman hear me roar. I am not voting for a woman because it's expected.... ROAARRR!!!!!....Isn't this what the feminist movement has been waiting for??? Come on be honest here. FINALLY we have a woman who is ready to step up and lead this country and now feminists are acting like spoiled little brats saying, "Well, this is what they are expecting us to do, so we ar

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 12:05:35 PM

 
I agree with Norman A . Rubin. I also believe your thinking is a bit jaded when it comes to your opinion of the former first lady. Why? 1. You stated that "Hillary is defining herself by her partner." because she is basing her experience from her husband's presidency." NOT TRUE! Hillary is self defining. Although I am not democrat in any sense of the word, nor am I a feminist. I am just stating the facts here. While she holds the office of Senator (Not Bill), she has only missed 214 of 2516 votes since January 23,2001 (Source:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300022) Compare this to Barack Obama's 243 missed out of 1208 votes.(source:http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=400629). Who is really doing their job? 2. As for the Monica Lewinsky affair, why should that issue be relevant to Hillary's campaign? Just because YOU personally aren't affected, you act as if everything she is stating has to pertain to you. Barack makes it a point to bring up African-Am

Posted on 05/12/2008 at 12:05:44 PM

 
Excellent! I agree with everything you said, and I'm not even a feminist. I'm not happy with any of the choices, Democrat or Republican.

Posted on 04/30/2008 at 3:04:53 PM

 
Also, BRAVO Racheline-you summed it up so, so well. I am so damn offended by Hillary supporters giving me that "you're setting the women's movement back 50 years by your vote" look when THEY see my Obama pin and start interrogating me about it. No, sweetie, YOU are setting the women's movement back by being SEXIST-as I woman I must vote for a women, even if I don't agree with her policies. I apologize for taking that whole equal rights thing so literally. Also, I've NEVER seen an Obama supporter go up to someone with a Hillary button and interrogate them about their choice. But I've seen and been the victim of such harassment almost 15 times since Super Tuesday.

Posted on 04/25/2008 at 10:04:18 AM

 
So, because two people are both young and charismatic, this means they vote the same way? How ridiculous a correlation is that? It's not even worth discussing any of your political rationales after such a pointless and irresponsible statement.

Posted on 04/25/2008 at 10:04:22 AM

 
Great article. I too think Hillary is a step back for women. It pained me to not vote for a female candidate, but she is not the right person for the job.

Posted on 04/09/2008 at 5:04:43 AM

 
The reason being Bill is selling a "buy one, get one free" and return to his idyllic "co-presidency" of the 1990s with him being a bonus "close personal adviser". That smacks of 3rd term to me. He was impeached and disbarred from practicing law. I have no respect for females who want him back in the White House as First Man. Horrid role model for our youth. It is people like Norman who are trying to give McCain a win in November by supporting known corruption in our highest office. Does he or Clinton know we are low on troops? Obama does. Obama has been quite active in helping our Viet Nam vets and also our Iraqi and Afghanistan homeless ones. Obama feels we need to be as careful pulling out as we careless going in. That is wisdom that has nothing to do with age. I do not find he has "charisma". Just very intelligent and excellent public speaking skills when it comes to speeches. Excellent article.

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 11:04:06 AM

 
I especially like number 4, except I would not use the label (made me smile though, about the beauty magazines). Bill Clinton is scheduled to appear in court in Los Angeles on 4/25/08 in a lawsuit going on since 2003. Hillary got her name removed as a defendant, but will have to testify in court. She complains the press picks on her, but how many times have you seen a report on this trial? It is rather important for voters to know about because it stems from her prior FEC fraud and non-disclosure. Monica: Hillary portrayed Bills playmates as the aggressors. She said in her book something like "I gasped" when Bill admitted he lied under oath to the Grand Jury. They used to say "the wife is the last one to know". So either she is not able to discern liars (he was seeing Jennifer Flowers, for what 8 years?) or she is lying herself. Divorcing him if she wanted to be president would have been the way to go.

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 11:04:01 AM

 
Oy vey to Norman's comment. She already voted yes to Iran. How could he trust her not to make the same mistakes again. First she was all for the invasion of Iraq. Next she told Code Pink that she gave the matter careful study, would like to agree, but could not. She said it was her proudest vote. Next she said "we acted on faulty intelligence" (see number 8) not taking personal responsibility for her own vote. Next she screeched: "this is George Bush's war...this was always George Bush's war". What will she say about her Iran yes vote? Oh, I already know: It is a non-issue, and her "enemies are spreading lies" about her vote. She said it is "make-up" and "fantasize" and wants to talk about "real issues". Hello, it is a real issue to me. Those people in Iran, like the babies and children in Iraq are not rubber dollies. So it is not just females who are unthinking in their vote.

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 11:04:18 AM

 
Okay vote for Obama - just remember in the past America voted for a man of charisma and youth and he escalated the Vietnam War with over 50,000 dead and many wounded mentally and physically. I'm for Hillary as she will not make that mistake.

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 7:04:15 AM

Type in Your Comments Below - (1000 characters left)
Your name:

Submit your own content on this or any topic. Get started »
Showing Comments 1 - 11 of 11
 
Most Commented On