Natalie Gulbis, the LPGA and the Golfer as Sex Debate

According to golf.com, Natalie Gulbis is the sexiest golfer in the LPGA, among eight other golfers selected for that title. The ages of the sexiest women, on the average, are in their '20s and are around 5'8". Most of these women are making the big bucks through modeling
Natalie Gulbis, the LPGA and the Golfer as Sex Debate
 contracts for clothing, calendars and the like. Natalie Gulbis is most noted for her calendar pictures, including one that was pulled by the LPGA in 2006, according to About.com's.

Should the LPGA Encourage the View of Woman Golfer as Sex Toy?

Most of the photographs showing Natalie as a sexy woman, don't involve the game of golf. She's partially clothed, at the beach, and looking happily tanned. She's sexy because she's young, healthy, and beautiful. And the physical demands of playing golf will help ensure she stays that way. From the LPGA's view, a sexy woman golfer will increase viewer participations and that can only mean additional funds. But is there no other role for a woman golfer than as sex toy?

On one hand, I think the LPGA should want to encourage women to play golf and if it requires sex appeal to do it, I'm all for it. Golf is a game that encourages health and allows one to play from a very young age to a very old age. On the other hand, if women feel they are required to be as beautiful as a model to golf, I'm against it. The LPGA should encourage other profiles as well, including the role women play as decision maker, social conscious, intellectual, wife and mother.

The Woman Golfer as Decisions Maker

According to GolfforWomen.com astronaut Eileen Collins plays golf, mostly with her husband who seeks amateur golfer status. Golfing is a pressure cooker sport, with thousands of people watching your every move. Not only does the sport require judgment, ability to face challenges, and the ability to meet adversity.

One look at two top women golfers, Annika Sorenstam and Pat Bradley, will convince anyone that golfers might not fit the general physical profile of a sexy woman. She needs to be powerful, competitive and physically fit. They may not look sexy to everyone on the golf course, but they're often the ones to watch. They bring home the money.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 27 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

awesome read!

Posted on 04/19/2008 at 9:04:01 AM

You really covered all the issues very well. I don't think this problem is connected only to golf or women. Men get seen as sex objects too and often link up with "trophy wives". Look at Beckham, the soccer star, and his wife. They are a power couple and looks are a part of the equation. When it comes to golf, I think these women are smart enough to realize that getting people to pay attention to golf can be hard and perhaps the sex appeal may bring more viewers to the game - and more dollars to help support the women who play....I honestly don't know if this is correct, just random musing here. Your article certainly got me thinking about this! Thanks.

Posted on 04/14/2008 at 11:04:21 PM

that was an excellent read!!

Posted on 04/10/2008 at 4:04:41 PM

This was really interesting! :-)

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 9:04:05 PM

great article

Posted on 04/08/2008 at 8:04:55 AM

Interesting article, Sheri.

Posted on 04/07/2008 at 5:04:55 AM

This is a great article here. You explore this current condition in Women's golf in an intelligent, mature way. As tough as it may be to fathom, it might be the toughest for ol' Miss Gulbis. Sometimes, the sexiest woman at the office is the one with the bulls-eye on her back. People speculate that her comely looks are the ONLY reason she's getting any attention at all, and that is but the ravings of the petty and jealous. However, when everyone else (read: GUYS!) is going "OOOOOH YA!!!! MAMMA JAMMA!" over Natalie, it does indeed diminish her accomplishments on the green. Like Chris said; IT'S GOLF!; not some beauty contest! Very well written, and thanks for sommenting on my poetic Gene Krupa bio.

Posted on 04/06/2008 at 10:04:54 AM

very interesting, thanks

Posted on 04/05/2008 at 11:04:00 AM

:-)

Posted on 04/04/2008 at 7:04:10 PM

I agree.

Posted on 04/04/2008 at 6:04:57 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 27 Next >>