We Had Abortions Too...and Now We Are Pro-life

Ms. Magazine to Release Fall Issue with Names of 5,000 Women Who Have Had Abortions

Ms. magazine plans to release its controversial fall issue next week containing a "We Had Abortions" cover story listing names of 5,000 women - famous and non-famous - who signed a petition stating that they've had abortions.

Fearful of the momentum growing against abortion-on-demand services and any South Dakotans who choose to vote yes on the Referred Law 6 abortion ban on their state's ballot on Nov. 7, Ms. magazine has coincided the release of its controversial fall issue with
 names of woman who've had abortions in hopes of ceasing the pro-life movement.

The Times, They Are A-Changin'
It's the same tactic Ms. successfully used back in 1972, when its debut issue included a manifesto signed by 53 women stating that they had undergone illegal abortions. The following pivotal year, the Supreme Court enacted Roe v. Wade, making abortion legal.

But I propose that Ms. magazine's "We Had Abortions" maneuver won't work this time. Over three decades later, the public is now armed with much more information surrounding childbearing and abortion that ever before. With an estimated 50 million abortions having been performed since 1973, plenty of women have experienced firsthand the physical, emotional and psychic toll that abortion exacts.

Medical advances have also made lay citizens privy to much more scientific data regarding childbearing from conception forward than in 1973. DNA tests now predict babies' sex at five weeks after conception.

Week 6 of the pregnancy calendars we pore over (whilst carrying wanted children) inform us of developing organs, including the "beginnings of the central nervous system," the same system that sends and receives pain signals.

Growing Up Pro-Choice
Pro-lifers aren't stupid. Pro-abortionists' desire to keep abortion legal is more about parental convenience and abdication of responsibility than anything else. It's a wrong mindset I too employed in the past, especially growing up in a self-centered society whose laws during most of my 37-year-old life told me it was okay to murder children.

 
Comments 1 - 10 of 84 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I agree that this was a gutsy honest heart-felt article to write and I thoroughly appreciate you taking the risk to do it. I think only a person who has experienced the pain of abortion can be as honest as you as well as understand why it moved you to a pro-life stance. I do think that if more people agreed to support those facing difficult pregnancy situations personally - i.e. financially, emotionally, mentally more children would be born. I can attest to that as I currently am very involved in the life of a child who was on the abortion block. It's not an easy situation. But again if more people made good on being involved instead of taking the holier than though stance, more kids would have a chance of being born.

Posted on 06/01/2009 at 8:06:56 PM

If your going to take that stand, what of the day after pill. The "child" hasn't become a child yet, and has no nervous system, to feel pain with... not that it would matter without having the brain devolop to rocognize taht pain (that comes later). SO can't we all atleast be pro morning after pill?

Posted on 03/11/2009 at 4:03:13 PM

The baby's blood supply is completely different from the mother's. The baby has a completely different genetic code from the mother's. The baby is a completely separate being from its mother. The only connection between the baby and its mother, while in the womb, is the source of nourishment. Does it matter if your 10 year old child is outside of your womb and you tell her, "Sorry, I don't feel like feeding you today." It's the same for your child in the womb. It's our responsibility as decent people to feed our children. How much less can we care for a child that is in the womb? Is there a difference in the child the day before she is born and the day after? There are thousands of couples waiting to adopt a child, who are on a two to five year waiting list. There is always another way. I hope not.

Posted on 02/03/2009 at 10:02:35 PM

I think that having an abortion is entirely up to the woman , or young teenage vulnerable girl, and has absolutely NOTHING to do with the self centred people who think who think they have the right to insult another person that has simply stated what they want to say. Have you not even bothered to think that a child would have to go through EVEN MORE suffering with, say, a FOURTEEN YEAR OLD MUM, just to prove a point to us "heartless bastards". Whoever "LOOK AT THE FACTS" is, yopu didnt even spell it right. AND PRACTISE WHAT YOOU PREACH!!!!!! you havent even bothered to look at another point of view. Seriously, SHUT UP.

Posted on 01/27/2009 at 10:01:51 AM

I find it ironic that pro-choice advocates dwell on the rape victim when millions of other mothers and fathers make the same choice. Terminating an innocent life has even stronger emotional and psychological baggage that is overlooked by pro-choice advocates. The life that should be taken is the rapist. A selfish, degrading, and destructive act towards another human should have severe consequences. If a man is shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that he raped a woman, he should forfeit his life.

Posted on 12/28/2008 at 1:12:59 PM

If you are pro-abortion, please go onto Youtube and watch "The Silent Scream" and if your still pro-abortion after seeing the trama and the pain an innocent baby goes through during an abortion, well, then your a heartless basturd.

Posted on 12/27/2008 at 11:12:43 PM

Thats rude, this woman poured out her heart to write this story. Whats up with all the rude comments? Seriously, it's an opinion, she's giving hers. Adults, kindly can comment there own opinions and explain why they differ from hers. For those of you insulting this woman's integrity and opinions, grow up a few years and learn that not everyone has to agree with you... stupid liberal feminists...

Posted on 12/27/2008 at 11:12:58 PM

who are you to say that rape victims will feel guilt afterwards? i know MANY who dont. and even if they did, well alot of people regret decisions but that doesnt mean those choices should be denied them. to deny choice for a rape victim is to RAPE HER AGAIN!!! i hardly see how destroying a womans dignity and taking her autonomy from her again so a child can be born, a child that would not miss its life is just. the potential for life does not override existing life. to treat women as a means to an end is ridiculous. women are not breeding pigs. they are humans with thoughts feelings and desires unlike a non sentient fetus. i highly doubt any child would want to be born if it would harm their mother in the process. no doubt it would be a lifetime of pain for both.

Posted on 12/06/2008 at 1:12:32 AM

And this is coming from a woman who had abortions four times in college... Your words are pathetic and meaningless. "I can't imagine how unspeakable it would be to carry an unwanted pregnancy as a result of rape. Or the shame of being an irresponsible and lost teen birthing an unwelcome baby. Or a parent who chooses to make the heartbreaking decision to terminate a child who has birth defects." That's right. You CAN'T IMAGINE. What've you done in college except go on a wild sex spree, "oops I'm pregnant", and sign-up for abortion? And now you speak before those in trauma after rape your fanatic Christian wisdom? You clown.

Posted on 11/08/2008 at 8:11:25 PM

how dare you use the title of a briliant bob dylan song for trying to force your christian fanatic ideas on to people. theres a word for forcing others to do what you want them to, its called FACISM.

Posted on 11/05/2008 at 4:11:06 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 84 Next >>