Bill Bradley as Vice-President: A Strong Choice for Obama, but Not for Clinton

Basketball Hall of Famer and former New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley is an interesting choice for vice-president. As the man who nearly defeated Vice-President Al Gore in the 2000 Democratic Primary, voters may welcome Bill Bradley as an anti-establishment fresh face. As a
Bill Bradley as Vice-President: A Strong Choice for Obama, but Not for Clinton
 vice-president, he would be a strong addition to the Barack Obama ticket, but a terrible choice for Hillary Clinton.

Barack Obama and Bill Bradley: Celebrity Status

Popular Appeal: As a potential Vice-President, Bill Bradley would have the same rock star appeal that Obama enjoys. Yet while Obama is popular with young voters, Bill Bradley still has popular appeal with older voters who remember his days in the New York Knicks.

Experience: As a potential Vice-President, Bill Bradley would bring a sense of experience and pragmatism to the Obama ticket. While Obama is more known for his inspiring speeches, Bill Bradley had a reputation as a "policy wonk."1 During his twenty years in the Senate, he had a proven record on tax policy reform, child support legislation, and federal budget reform. While he enjoys popular appeal with basketball fans, he may also draw in policy-oriented voters who tend to vote on substance.

Platform: As a potential vice-president, Bill Bradley is a very liberal Democrat, more liberal than Hillary Clinton or Al Gore. Bill Bradley has been a strong proponent of universal health care, gun control, and campaign finance reform. Conventional wisdom suggests that Obama should choose a more moderate vice-president, but I don't think it would be a problem in Obama's case. Obama, in spite of his populist platform, already seems to have a stronghold on moderate voters. Bill Bradley has also shown himself capable of breaking ranks with his party when he needed to. In 1981, he supported Reagan's cuts on spending, an indication that he may be able to work with people from other parties.1

Vice-President Bill Bradley would be the best of both worlds for Obama-celebrity status combined with a policy-oriented mindset.

Hillary Clinton and Bill Bradley: A Terrible Match

Related information
  • Bill Bradley ran to the left of Vice-President Gore in 2000.
  • Vice-President Bill Bradley's policy-oriented mindset would complement Obama's rock star appeal.
  • Bill Bradley, as the anti-establishment candidate, would not work well with Hillary Clinton.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 42 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

obama need to pick a woman like cliton because men always over every thing let a woman stand for the u.s. nation i am only 13

Posted on 08/23/2008 at 5:08:08 PM

i think bill bradely would be good and hillary cliton

Posted on 08/23/2008 at 5:08:56 PM

Bradley would be an excellent choice. He brings experience, will attract older voters, he is very trustworthy and likable, and he would help carry the New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania electorate. Plus, there's the Princeton connection. Both Bradley and Michelle Obama's brother were star basketball players for Princeton (oh yeah...also my alma mater). Obama is also a basketball player. Bradley was an early endorser of Obama and he has been staying in the ring with recently published books. His platform lines up very well with Obama. Bradley is a very logical choice. I'd give up 4 months of my work as a busy physician to actively campaign for an Obama-Bradley ticket.

Posted on 06/05/2008 at 8:06:29 AM

Solid writing and I enjoyed reading. But I think Bradley would add no excitement to anyone's ticket. He's had his run, so to speak. I don't care very much for Obama and don't trust him. I would take issue with your opinion that Obama "seems to have a stronghold on moderate voters." I know this was written before the Pennsylvania primaries (and PA is a blue state) but Obama's about as far off the middle as you can get. Hillary is more centrist and I think she's doing better as many people begin to look at her independently from her husband's administration. It's not exactly progressive to look at a woman's qualifications in terms of "what does your husband do?" I know Hillary's no shrinking violet but then neither is Danica Patrick. Do we need shrinking violets as President? I don't think so...

Posted on 05/01/2008 at 6:05:46 AM

:)

Posted on 04/18/2008 at 6:04:49 AM

great article

Posted on 04/17/2008 at 1:04:57 PM

Obama would truly suck as president. He is a crooked man. People need to wake up and see that. Oh, are so many in the dark.

Posted on 04/16/2008 at 7:04:56 AM

Thanks for the well-thought out analysis.

Posted on 04/16/2008 at 6:04:10 AM

This is a wonderful analysis. You really put this together very well. I didn't know much about "possible" candidates but this has given me some insight. Thank you, thank you.

Posted on 04/15/2008 at 10:04:51 PM

wow, interesting comments here!

Posted on 04/14/2008 at 6:04:19 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 42 Next >>