Killing for Pleasure?

Beware of the Hunter Who Kills for the Pleasure of the Kill

I always will remember,
'Twas a year ago November,
I went out to hunt some deer
On a morning bright and clear.
I went and shot the maximum the game laws would allow:
Two game wardens, seven hunters, and a cow.

* * * *

The law was very firm, it
Took away my permit,
The worst punishment I ever endured.
It turned out there was a reason,
Cows were out of season,

And one of the hunters wasn't insured.

And there's ten stuffed heads in my trophy room right now:
Two game wardens, seven hunters, and a pure-bred Guernsey cow. 
The Hunting Song by Tom Lehrer.

The “fun” of killing? Want to make hunting a “sport”? Arm the deer. Change the Second Amendment, N.R.A., to protect the right to arm bears. Make it a fair endeavor.

First of all, let me confess that I am not a hunter, don’t really know any hunters and my basic prejudices are drawn from the killing of Bambi’s mother.

I am, also, not a gun owner, although some of our friends carry a pistol with them wherever they go and others own rifles and other weapons used in target shooting and the occasional hunting for skeet.

I have no overwhelming argument against hunting animals for food or their pelts, this practice being affirmed by most of mainstream religions and value systems. I am, moreover, a passionate advocate of a rare steak or hamburger, dripping with juice. I wear leather with no real thought of from where it comes. As far as I know, tuna is born, lives and dies of natural causes in a small can.

Nor am I in the group of people who decry the use of animals in medical experiments and testing. If one human life can be saved through the death of a hundred animals, then I am supportive. (I have some qualms over the use of animals in testing cosmetics or for some other less worthy aim than saving human life or alleviating human disease.)

Related information
  • Not all hunters are sociopaths, but nearly all serial killers started by killing animals.
 
Comments 1 - 10 of 28 Next >>
Comments
Type in Your Comments Below

I thought this had been "put to bed" a year ago. My issue is not with hunting,even thought COULDN'T DO IT myself. Killing Bambi's Mom turned me off. I would rather think that my steak, very rare and burned on the outside, came into this world on a tray at the market. Don't bother to tell me that's nutty; I am fully aware. My most serious objection is that some people get their pleasure not in strolling through the woods on a brisk morning or in eating the venison (which I also enjoy, or the experience bonding with friends, but in the act of taking a life, the killing itself. If that is deemed irrational, live with it; I will.

Posted on 11/12/2008 at 10:11:58 AM

You can eat meat but you can not eat a book.

Posted on 11/12/2008 at 9:11:59 AM

(continued) I strongly believe many men today have a deep down urge to explore and conquer. Unfortunately, those days have passed us by. I would rather do some saltwater fishing but since I'm in Montana, the homeless shelters will be having venison again next fall. To be honest, I feel sorry for those that aren't in touch with their "animal side". We aren't as evolved as you might think and by understanding your hardwiring for survival, you might just learn a little about who you are. I would seek out and take orders from an experienced hunter/woodsman over a scholar during a natural disaster or other major crises.

Posted on 06/24/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

I have to be the one to say it don't I? Humans are murderous creatures. Many of the earliest human skulls that have been found revealed the cause of death as blunt trauma to the back of the head (hit by another human). Maybe you don't have that certain "bloodlust" that many humans, especially men, still have. I hunt but hate the taste of deer so I give it all away. I hunt because I like it. I don't go out of my way to cause a painful death but I do hunt for the kill itself and the process that leads to it. I have used guns and bows but would really like to use some sort of very low-tech methods someday. Black bear vs. me with a medium sized sword would be pretty awesome. Now don't go saying I'm evil or sadistic. I know someone reading this can agree with me. Deep inside many of us is a bloodthirsty beast that needs some satisfaction. If an animal or two dies for that, so be it.

Posted on 06/24/2007 at 12:06:00 PM

Oh and the people on here who talk like morons about killing animals with no remorse don't deserve to call themselves hunters and the way they are talking on the internet it almost makes me ashamed of what I do. Huntings a privlage not a right and the majority of the poplulation isn't anti-hunter don't show us in this light

Posted on 01/27/2007 at 9:01:00 PM

What people have to understand is that as it is in any sport their are people who abuse their privlage. Their are some hunters who kill for pleasure and I'm saying this as a hunter it disgust me. I've always viewed hunting as somthing magical. If I go all year with out shooting a thing I'm happy. Waking up at four in the morning and just being theri watching the woods wke up. having birds landing on your boots its magical. The deer and other game I take I respectin the upmost and if I have enough meat in the frige I donate it to the charity Hunters for the Hungry In conclusion I'd just like to say that probably most people see the negatives of hunting but be assured that is the exception not the norm and I and many others severly dislike poor hunting practises

Posted on 01/27/2007 at 9:01:00 PM

Good read, Jim. I agree that these penned in hunting grounds should be abolished. I am not a hunter either, but do agree that if you use the animal for food, go for it. But as for arming the deer with guns, I take exception. Any time you go out to hunt, you're waiting for hours for the game to come to you. And then you most often miss killing it. The animals, with their senses of smell, hearing and sight, provide more than a challenge for the hunter. I work with a guy who took three days off work to sit in a tree waiting for a deer to show up. He got skunked and I just shook my head. He lost over $600.00 in wages for nothing. Deer - 1, Human - 0.

Posted on 01/09/2007 at 5:01:00 AM

And by the way (I forgot to say it) it's called "kill what you eat," "eat what you kill," or "living off the land," not "ritualized killing, slaughter for pleasure, or torture for gratification." And an earlier comment was exactly correct: Hunters are not serial killers. The cases of animal killers growing to be serial killers were torturers...putting cats in bags and lighting them on fire, and such. I have never sat over a wounded deer and poked it with an arrow, or any crap like that. Your facts are not only way off, they are entirely unresearched. If you had researched your facts, you may not have written this article. On the plus side, I entirely agree with your hatred of canned hunting. This is not only completely unsporting, it is entirely unfair and requires no talent.

Posted on 12/27/2006 at 8:12:00 PM

You have already stated that you never hunt...this does make you completely ignorant on the subject. You cannot write about what you don't know. I can't write about being a poor black child living in the bronx because I am a white guy in south carolina...oh, and by the way...the deer, dove, squirrel, duck, and other game that I eat was killed in a whole lot more fair of a manner than your cheeseburger. Talk to me again when you have decided to not be an idiot.

Posted on 12/27/2006 at 8:12:00 PM

What's with you guys? Retarded? Ignorant? Now let's see, deer have superior sight and smell, guys have guns. If a deer could hold a gun, they would? My feelings have not changed, I hold no issue for those who hunt as a bonding experience or for the meet. My concern is with those who get their jollies from the act of killing. I don't expect sophisticated thinkers such as Mr. Creech to get the distinction, but in the meantime, go on thinking that animals were placed on earth for your enjoyment in killing them. And for your information, we may disagree but this does not make either of us "retarded" or "ignorant". It is really scary to see the vitriol that has come out from this article.

Posted on 12/27/2006 at 4:12:00 PM

Comments 1 - 10 of 28 Next >>